The Neural Consequences of Attentional Prioritization of Internal Representations in Visual Working Memory

Although humans can hold multiple items in mind simultaneously, the contents of working memory (WM) can be selectively prioritized to effectively guide behavior in response to rapidly changing exigencies in the environment. Neural evidence for this is seen in studies of dual serial retrocuing of two items held concurrently in visual WM, in which evidence in occipital cortex for the active neural representation of the cued item increases, and evidence for the uncued item decreases, often to levels indistinguishable from empirical baseline. Although this pattern is reminiscent of the effects of selective attention on visual perception, the extent to which more subtle principles of visual attention may also apply to visual working memory remains uncertain. In the present study we explored whether the well-characterized “same-object” benefit in visual target detection, attributed to object-based attention (e.g., Duncan, 1984; Egly, Driver, & Rafal, 1994), may also be observed for information held in visual WM. fMRI data were collected while human subjects (male and female) performed a multi-step serial retrocuing task in which they first viewed two two-dimensional sample stimuli comprised of colored moving dots. After stimulus offset, an initial relevance cue then indicated whether both dimensions of only the first or only the second object, or only the color or only the direction-of-motion of both objects, would be relevant for the remainder of the trial, which then proceeded with the standard dual serial retrocuing procedure. Thus, on “object-relevant” trials, the ensuing priority cues prompted the selection of one from among two features (“color” or “direction”) bound to the same object, whereas on “feature-relevant” trials the priority cues prompted the selection of one from among two features each belonging to a different object. Results of analyses with multivariate inverted encoding models (IEM) revealed a same-object benefit on object-relevant trials: Whereas, on feature-relevant trials, the first priority cue triggered a strengthening of the neural representation of the cued feature and a concomitant weakening-to-baseline of the uncued feature; on object-relevant trials the cued item remained active but did not increase in strength, and the uncued item weakened, but remained significantly elevated throughout the delay period. Of additional interest, on both types of trials the second priority cue prompted an active recoding of the uncued item into a different neural representation, perhaps to minimize its ability to interfere with recall of the cued item. Finally, although stimulus-specific representation in parietal and frontal cortex was weak and uneven, these regions closely tracked the higher-order information of which stimulus category was relevant for behavior at all points during the trial, indicating an important role in controlling the prioritization of information in visual working memory.

[1]  T. Egner,et al.  Working memory as internal attention: Toward an integrative account of internal and external selection processes , 2012, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[2]  André J. Noest,et al.  Speed and direction response profiles of neurons in macaque MT and MST show modest constraint line tuning , 2013, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[3]  Jarrod A. Lewis-Peacock,et al.  Neural Evidence for the Flexible Control of Mental Representations. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  G. Woodman,et al.  Selective storage and maintenance of an object’s features in visual working memory , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[5]  Jarrod A. Lewis-Peacock,et al.  Decoding the internal focus of attention , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  Shape and color conjunction stimuli are represented as bound objects in visual working memory , 2011 .

[7]  A. Nobre,et al.  Top-down modulation: bridging selective attention and working memory , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  E. Miller,et al.  Gradual progression from sensory to task-related processing in cerebral cortex , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Edward F. Ester,et al.  Parietal and Frontal Cortex Encode Stimulus-Specific Mnemonic Representations during Visual Working Memory , 2015, Neuron.

[10]  A. Treisman,et al.  Binding in short-term visual memory. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[11]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Neural Evidence for a Distinction between Short-term Memory and the Focus of Attention , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  Adam C. Riggall,et al.  Distributed Patterns of Activity in Sensory Cortex Reflect the Precision of Multiple Items Maintained in Visual Short-Term Memory , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  Thomas Serre,et al.  Object decoding with attention in inferior temporal cortex , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  M. Behrmann,et al.  Selective attention to the parts of an object , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[15]  M. Carandini,et al.  Normalization as a canonical neural computation , 2011, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[16]  D. Heeger,et al.  Decoding and Reconstructing Color from Responses in Human Visual Cortex , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  W. Fias,et al.  Paying attention to working memory: Similarities in the spatial distribution of attention in mental and physical space , 2016, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[18]  Masud Husain,et al.  Causal Evidence for a Privileged Working Memory State in Early Visual Cortex , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  Johannes Jacobus Fahrenfort,et al.  Current and future goals are represented in opposite patterns in object-selective cortex , 2018, bioRxiv.

[20]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.

[21]  Ying Cai,et al.  Tracking stimulus representation across a 2-back visual working memory task , 2020, Royal Society Open Science.

[22]  B. Postle,et al.  Different states of priority recruit different neural codes in visual working memory , 2018, bioRxiv.

[23]  A. Nobre,et al.  Attentional modulation of object representations in working memory. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[24]  A. Nobre,et al.  Prioritizing Information during Working Memory: Beyond Sustained Internal Attention , 2017, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  John T. Serences,et al.  Computational advances towards linking BOLD and behavior , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  Paul M. Bays,et al.  Rapid Forgetting Prevented by Retrospective Attention Cues , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  A. Nobre,et al.  Orienting Attention to Locations in Internal Representations , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  E. Vogel,et al.  Shape and color conjunction stimuli are represented as bound objects in visual working memory , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  Jeremy Freeman,et al.  Motion Direction Biases and Decoding in Human Visual Cortex , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Decoding Attended Information in Short-term Memory: An EEG Study , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[31]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[32]  Vaidehi S. Natu,et al.  Category-Specific Cortical Activity Precedes Retrieval During Memory Search , 2005, Science.

[33]  M. Chun Visual working memory as visual attention sustained internally over time , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  B. Postle,et al.  The cognitive neuroscience of working memory. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[35]  J Driver,et al.  A selective review of selective attention research from the past century. , 2001, British journal of psychology.

[36]  Paul M Bays,et al.  The precision of visual working memory is set by allocation of a shared resource. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[37]  Ipek Oruc,et al.  Improved face discrimination after face adaptation , 2009 .

[38]  Emma Y. Wu,et al.  Storage and binding of object features in visual working memory , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[39]  Adam C. Riggall,et al.  Reactivation of latent working memories with transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2016, Science.

[40]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[41]  Matthew F. S. Rushworth,et al.  Frontal and Parietal Cortical Interactions with Distributed Visual Representations during Selective Attention and Action Selection , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  J. Duncan Selective attention and the organization of visual information. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[43]  C. Allefeld,et al.  Cortical specialization for attended versus unattended working memory , 2018, Nature Neuroscience.

[44]  K. Oberauer,et al.  Attention to Information in Working Memory , 2012 .

[45]  R. Rafal,et al.  Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[46]  Jarrod A. Lewis-Peacock,et al.  Multiple neural states of representation in short-term memory? It’s a matter of attention , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[47]  S. Morad,et al.  Ceramide-orchestrated signalling in cancer cells , 2012, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[48]  J. M. Warren,et al.  THE FRONTAL GRANULAR CORTEX AND BEHAVIOR , 1964 .

[49]  Adam C. Riggall,et al.  Within-Category Decoding of Information in Different Attentional States in Short-Term Memory , 2016, Cerebral cortex.