Improving Outcomes After Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Population-Based, 12-year Trend Analysis of 7446 Patients

OBJECTIVE Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis has become increasingly used over the past decade. The objective of this trend analysis is to assess whether clinical outcomes after laparoscopic appendectomy have improved over the past 12 years. METHODS This analysis is based on the prospective database of the Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery. All patients undergoing emergency laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis from 1995 to 2006 were included. The following outcomes were assessed for each of the 12 years: conversion rates, intraoperative complications, surgical postoperative complications, general postoperative complications, rate of reoperations, and length of hospital stay. Unadjusted and risk-adjusted multivariable analyses were performed. Statistical significance was set at a level of P < 0.05. All statistical tests were 2-sided. RESULTS Data from 7446 patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis were prospectively collected. Over the period of observation, the conversion rate decreased significantly from 2.2% to 1.2% (P(trend)< 0.001), as did intraoperative complications (from 3.1% to 0.7%; P(trend)< 0.001), surgical postoperative complications (from 6.1% to 1.9%; P(trend)< 0.001), general postoperative complications (from 4.9% to 1.5%; P(trend)< 0.001), and rates of reoperations (from 3.4% to 0.7%; P(trend)< 0.001). Average postoperative length of hospital stay also significantly decreased from 4.9 to 3.5 days (P(trend)< 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Our investigation provides compelling evidence that intraoperative complications, surgical and general postoperative complications, conversion rates, rates of reoperations, and average length of hospital stay have significantly decreased over the past decade in patients undergoing surgery for acute appendicitis. The present trend analysis is the first one in the literature encompassing more than a decade and reporting clinical outcomes after laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis, which represents an important quality control.

[1]  B. Miedema,et al.  Laparoscopic appendectomy--is it worth the cost? Trend analysis in the US from 2000 to 2005. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[2]  A. Shabbir,et al.  Laparoscopic appendectomy by residents: evaluating outcomes and learning curve , 2009, Surgical Endoscopy.

[3]  A. Darzi,et al.  Traditional and Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Adults: Outcomes in English NHS Hospitals Between 1996 and 2006 , 2008, Annals of surgery.

[4]  S. Paterson-Brown,et al.  Changing trends in surgery for acute appendicitis , 2008, The British journal of surgery.

[5]  W. Woodward,et al.  Disconnect Between Incidence of Nonperforated and Perforated Appendicitis: Implications for Pathophysiology and Management , 2007, Annals of surgery.

[6]  M. Knuiman,et al.  Surgeon experience and trends in intraoperative complications in laparoscopic cholecystectomy , 2006, The British journal of surgery.

[7]  Ping-Kuei Chung,et al.  Laparoscopic appendectomy in the elderly , 2006, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[8]  N. Katkhouda,et al.  Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy: A Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Study , 2005, Annals of surgery.

[9]  M.H.S. Ulrich Guller M.D..  Surgical Outcomes Research Based on Administrative Data: Inferior or Complementary to Prospective Randomized Clinical Trials? , 2005, World Journal of Surgery.

[10]  Ninh T Nguyen,et al.  Trends in utilization and outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. , 2004, American journal of surgery.

[11]  Ricardo Pietrobon,et al.  Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy: Outcomes Comparison Based on a Large Administrative Database , 2004, Annals of surgery.

[12]  Y. Munz,et al.  The impact of a resident’s seniority on operative time and length of hospital stay for laparoscopic appendectomy: outcomes used to measure the resident’s laparoscopic skills , 2004, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[13]  S. Sauerland,et al.  Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. , 2002, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[14]  Eva R. Helgeson,et al.  A prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: Clinical and economic analyses. , 2001, Surgery.

[15]  S. Laurberg,et al.  Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy , 2001, The British journal of surgery.

[16]  R. McLeod,et al.  A meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis. , 1999, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.

[17]  D. Rowland,et al.  A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. , 1999, American journal of surgery.

[18]  B. Littenberg,et al.  Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy. , 1999, Surgical laparoscopy & endoscopy.

[19]  S. Sauerland,et al.  Laparoscopic vs conventional appendectomy – a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials , 1998, Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.

[20]  D. Pohl,et al.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a metaanalysis. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[21]  R. Tauxe,et al.  The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. , 1990, American journal of epidemiology.

[22]  S K Wirtschafter,et al.  Endoscopic appendectomy. , 1976, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[23]  C. Mcburney.  IV. The Incision Made in the Abdominal Wall in Cases of Appendicitis, with a Description of a New Method of Operating. , 1894, Annals of surgery.

[24]  C. Mcburney.  The Indications For Early Laparotomy In Appendicitis , 1891 .

[25]  C. Mcburney.  II. The Indications for Early Laparotomy in Appendicitis. , 2022, Annals of surgery.