Trade-off between paraffin-based and aluminium-loaded HTPB fuels to improve performance of hybrid rocket fed with N2O

In the effort of raising the slow fuel-regression rate of hybrid rockets, two approaches focused on the fuel nature, i.e. the inclusion of metal particles into classical HTPB grains and the use of paraffin-wax based fuels, are investigated and contrasted with each other in this paper. A series of static tests on two hybrid rocket engines of different lab scales have been carried out by burning pure HTPB, aluminium-loaded HTPB or a paraffinic fuel with gaseous nitrous oxide. Fuel-regression rate and combustion efficiency outcomes are discussed. Aluminized HTPB yields regression-rate improvement whose magnitude decreases at high mass fluxes. Regression-rate increase of about 80% over aluminized HTPB is featured by paraffin-wax based fuel, but with lower efficiency and at the cost of poorer mechanical stiffness. A comparison with some other data obtained from pure HTPB and metal-loaded HTPB burned with gaseous oxygen shows that, in the tested operating conditions, regression rate enhancement achieved with the addition of aluminium powder is slightly larger with nitrous oxide than with oxygen. A trade-off between the two classes of fuels is made based on overall engine performance.

[1]  Carmine Carmicino,et al.  Performance comparison between two different injector configurations in a hybrid rocket , 2005 .

[2]  Carmine Carmicino,et al.  Role of Injection in Hybrid Rockets Regression Rate Behavior , 2005 .

[3]  David W. Netzer,et al.  Hybrid Rocket Internal Ballistics , 1972 .

[4]  Carmine Carmicino,et al.  Acoustics, Vortex Shedding, and Low-Frequency Dynamics Interaction in an Unstable Hybrid Rocket , 2009 .

[5]  Stephen A. Whitmore,et al.  Engineering Model for Self-Pressurizing Saturated-N2O-Propellant Feed Systems , 2010 .

[6]  M. Chiaverini,et al.  Review of Solid-Fuel Regression Rate Behavior in Classical and Nonclassical Hybrid Rocket Motors , 2007 .

[7]  Brian J. Cantwell,et al.  Combustion of Liquefying Hybrid Propellants: Part 1, General Theory , 2002 .

[8]  V. K. Jain,et al.  A review of hybrid rockets: present status and future potential , 1979 .

[9]  Brian Evans,et al.  Metals, Energetic Additives, and Special Binders Used in Solid Fuels for Hybrid Rockets , 2007 .

[10]  Daniele Pavarin,et al.  The "Vortex Reloaded" project: experimental investigation on fully tangential vortex injection in N2O - paraffin hybrid motors , 2012 .

[11]  G. Marxman,et al.  Turbulent boundary layer combustion in the hybrid rocket , 1963 .

[12]  Arif Karabeyoglu,et al.  Modeling of N2O Decomposition Events , 2008 .

[13]  Greg Zilliac,et al.  Fuel Regression Rate Characterization Using a Laboratory Scale Nitrous Oxide Hybrid Propulsion System , 2006 .

[14]  Carmine Carmicino,et al.  Influence of a Conical Axial Injector on Hybrid Rocket Performance , 2006 .

[15]  Greg Zilliac,et al.  SCALE-UP TESTS OF HIGH REGRESSION RATE LIQUEFYING HYBRID ROCKET FUELS , 2003 .

[16]  J. Taylor.  An Introduction to Error Analysis , 1982 .

[17]  George Story,et al.  Flight Testing of Hybrid-Powered Vehicles , 2006 .

[18]  G. Soave.  Equilibrium constants from a modified Redlich-Kwong equation of state , 1972 .

[19]  L. D. Landro,et al.  A WIDE CHARACTERIZATION OF PARAFFIN-BASED FUELS MIXED WITH STYRENE-BASED THERMOPLASTIC POLYMERS FOR HYBRID PROPULSION , 2016 .

[20]  Kenneth K. Kuo,et al.  INSTANTANEOUS REGRESSION BEHAVIOR OF HTPB SOLID FUELS BURNING WITH GOX IN A SIMULATED HYBRID ROCKET MOTOR , 1997 .