Belowground biodiversity effects of plant symbionts support aboveground productivity.

Soil microbes play key roles in ecosystems, yet the impact of their diversity on plant communities is still poorly understood. Here we demonstrate that the diversity of belowground plant-associated soil fungi promotes plant productivity and plant coexistence. Using additive partitioning of biodiversity effects developed in plant biodiversity studies, we demonstrate that this positive relationship can be driven by complementarity effects among soil fungi in one soil type and by a selection effect resulting from the fungal species that stimulated plant productivity the most in another soil type. Selection and complementarity effects among fungal species contributed to improving plant productivity up to 82% and 85%, respectively, above the average of the respective fungal species monocultures depending on the soil in which they were grown. These results also indicate that belowground diversity may act as insurance for maintaining plant productivity under differing environmental conditions.

[1]  M. V. D. van der Heijden,et al.  Mycorrhizal fungal identity and diversity relaxes plant-plant competition. , 2011, Ecology.

[2]  S. Scheu,et al.  Genotypic richness and dissimilarity opposingly affect ecosystem functioning. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[3]  O. Alizadeh,et al.  Mycorrhizal Symbiosis , 1986, Forest Science.

[4]  T. Roose,et al.  Traits related to differences in function among three arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi , 2011, Plant and Soil.

[5]  P. Kennedy.  Ectomycorrhizal fungi and interspecific competition: species interactions, community structure, coexistence mechanisms, and future research directions. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[6]  M. V. D. van der Heijden,et al.  Positive effects of organic farming on below-ground mutualists: large-scale comparison of mycorrhizal fungal communities in agricultural soils. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[7]  E. Zavaleta,et al.  Sustaining multiple ecosystem functions in grassland communities requires higher biodiversity , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  O. Huguenin-Elie,et al.  Strong mixture effects among four species in fertilized agricultural grassland led to persistent and consistent transgressive overyielding , 2009 .

[9]  A. Dvořáčková,et al.  Development and activity of Glomus intraradices as affected by co-existence with Glomus claroideum in one root system , 2009, Mycorrhiza.

[10]  A. Schüßler,et al.  Diversispora celata sp. nov: molecular ecology and phylotaxonomy of an inconspicuous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus. , 2009, The New phytologist.

[11]  Cécile Thonar.  Synthetic mycorrhizal communities: Establishment and functioning , 2009 .

[12]  J. Bever,et al.  Preferential allocation to beneficial symbiont with spatial structure maintains mycorrhizal mutualism. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[13]  T. Roose,et al.  Impact of growth and uptake patterns of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on plant phosphorus uptake—a modelling study , 2008, Plant and Soil.

[14]  M. V. D. van der Heijden,et al.  The unseen majority: soil microbes as drivers of plant diversity and productivity in terrestrial ecosystems. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[15]  J. Jansa,et al.  Are there benefits of simultaneous root colonization by different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi? , 2008, The New phytologist.

[16]  J. Klironomos,et al.  Influence of Phylogeny on Fungal Community Assembly and Ecosystem Functioning , 2007, Science.

[17]  R. Koide,et al.  Role of niche restrictions and dispersal in the composition of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities , 2007 .

[18]  M. V. D. van der Heijden,et al.  The mycorrhizal contribution to plant productivity, plant nutrition and soil structure in experimental grassland. , 2006, The New phytologist.

[19]  J. Bever,et al.  Mycorrhizal fungal identity and richness determine the diversity and productivity of a tallgrass prairie system. , 2006, The New phytologist.

[20]  P. Balvanera,et al.  Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[21]  D. Wardle.  The influence of biotic interactions on soil biodiversity. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[22]  D. Croll,et al.  Genetic variability in a population of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi causes variation in plant growth. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[23]  W. Boer,et al.  Fungal biomass development in a chronosequence of land abandonment , 2006 .

[24]  J. Jansa,et al.  Phosphorus Acquisition Strategies within Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal Community of a Single Field Site , 2005, Plant and Soil.

[25]  C. Lan,et al.  Chemically Assisted Phytoextraction of Heavy Metal Contaminated Soils using Three Plant Species , 2005, Plant and Soil.

[26]  F. Chapin,et al.  EFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY ON ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING: A CONSENSUS OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE , 2005 .

[27]  T. Boller,et al.  Impact of long-term conventional and organic farming on the diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi , 2004, Oecologia.

[28]  A. Fitter,et al.  Arbuscular mycorrhizal community composition associated with two plant species in a grassland ecosystem , 2002, Molecular ecology.

[29]  T. Anken,et al.  Diversity and structure of AMF communities as affected by tillage in a temperate soil , 2002, Mycorrhiza.

[30]  F. Woodward,et al.  Biodiversity manipulation experiments : studies replicated at multiple sites , 2002 .

[31]  Daniel Schwarzott,et al.  A new fungal phylum, the Glomeromycota: phylogeny and evolution * * Dedicated to Manfred Kluge (Tech , 2001 .

[32]  Vladimir K. Vanag,et al.  Inwardly Rotating Spiral Waves in a Reaction-Diffusion System , 2001, Science.

[33]  P. Reich,et al.  Diversity and Productivity in a Long-Term Grassland Experiment , 2001, Science.

[34]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments , 2001, Nature.

[35]  R. Koide.  Functional complementarity in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. , 2000 .

[36]  Pereira,et al.  Plant diversity and productivity experiments in european grasslands , 1999, Science.

[37]  T. Boller,et al.  "Sampling effect" a problem in biodiversity manipulation? A reply to David A. Wardle , 1999 .

[38]  D. Wardle.  Is "Sampling Effect" a Problem for Experiments Investigating Biodiversity-Ecosystem Function Relationships? , 1999 .

[39]  M. Loreau,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: the insurance hypothesis. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  H. Vierheilig,et al.  Ink and Vinegar, a Simple Staining Technique for Arbuscular-Mycorrhizal Fungi , 1998, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[41]  Ian R. Sanders,et al.  Mycorrhizal fungal diversity determines plant biodiversity, ecosystem variability and productivity , 1998, Nature.

[42]  A. Fitter,et al.  Ploughing up the wood-wide web? , 1998, Nature.

[43]  A. Fitter,et al.  The arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi of Hyacinthoides non-scripta. II. Seasonal and spatial patterns of fungal populations , 1998 .

[44]  Michael A. Huston,et al.  Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity , 1997, Oecologia.

[45]  J. Graham,et al.  Functioning of mycorrhizal associations along the mutualism–parasitism continuum* , 1997 .

[46]  Vadim Radaev.  The Competition , 1992 .

[47]  G. Fairchild,et al.  A new method which gives an objective measure of colonization of roots by vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. , 1990, The New phytologist.

[48]  L. Abbott,et al.  COLONIZATION OF THE ROOT SYSTEM OF SUBTERRANEAN CLOVER BY THREE SPECIES OF VESICULAR-ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI , 1984 .