Hepatic blood supply: comparison of optimized dual phase contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography.

PURPOSE To optimize and determine the value of dual-phase contrast material-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance (MR) angiography for preoperative evaluation of the blood supply to the liver. MATERIALS AND METHODS Dual phase 3D MR angiography of the hepatic arteries and portal vein was performed in 140 patients. In 80 patients, the value of fat saturation, digital image subtraction, an anticholinergic agent, and a high-caloric meal were evaluated. In the next 60 patients, MR angiographic and digital subtraction angiographic (DSA) image quality and diagnostic value were compared. RESULTS Fat-saturated images were of significantly better quality (P < .01) than non-fat-saturated images. Digital image subtraction was useful in only 23 of 40 patients. The injection of an anticholinergic agent was superfluous, whereas administration of a high-caloric meal helped in demonstration of the superior mesenteric artery and portal vein. Classification on MR angiograms of the arterial blood supply was correct in 57 of 60 patients. All arterial and portal venous lesions were seen on MR angiograms, and MR angiograms had a significantly higher subjective image-quality ranking than did DSA images in the evaluation of the portal vein (P < .05). CONCLUSION Fat saturation and use of a high-caloric meal improve the results of MR angiography of hepatic vessels. MR angiography was comparable to DSA for evaluation of the arterial system and was superior for demonstration of the portal vein; therefore, MR angiography could replace intraarterial DSA.

[1]  T. Winter,et al.  Evaluation of the portal venous system before liver transplantation: value of phase-contrast MR angiography. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  A. Toyonaga,et al.  Postprandial splanchnic hemodynamic response in patients with cirrhosis of the liver: evaluation with "triple-vessel" duplex US. , 1996, Radiology.

[3]  T K Foo,et al.  Contrast-enhanced abdominal MR angiography: optimization of imaging delay time by automating the detection of contrast material arrival in the aorta. , 1997, Radiology.

[4]  S. Kerns,et al.  Comparison of Ultrasound, CT, and MR Imaging in the Evaluation of Candidates for TIPS , 1995, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

[5]  E. Fishman,et al.  Identification of the aberrant hepatic artery with axial spiral CT. , 1995, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[6]  D. Mitchell,et al.  Respiratory and postprandial changes in portal flow rate: Assessment by phase contrast MR imaging , 1996, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[7]  M. Bernardino,et al.  Comparison of pulsed Doppler sonography and angiography in patients with portal hypertension. , 1987, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  A. Shetty,et al.  Mesenteric circulation: three-dimensional MR angiography with a gadolinium-enhanced multiecho gradient-echo technique. , 1997, Radiology.

[9]  T. Chenevert,et al.  Breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and its major branches. , 1995, Radiology.

[10]  E Grabbe,et al.  Differences in injection rates on contrast-enhanced breath-hold three-dimensional MR angiography. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  O. Takizawa,et al.  Three-Dimensional Black Blood Mr Angiography of the Liver during Breath Holding , 1994, Acta radiologica.

[12]  M. Prince,et al.  Gadolinium‐enhanced MR angiography of visceral arteries in patients with suspected chronic mesenteric ischemia , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  R R Edelman,et al.  Imaging of the portal venous system in patients with cirrhosis: MR angiography vs duplex Doppler sonography. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  T. Winter,et al.  Hepatic arterial anatomy in transplantation candidates: evaluation with three-dimensional CT arteriography. , 1995, Radiology.

[15]  J P Ridgway,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the portal venous system: comparison with x-ray angiography. , 1994, Radiology.

[16]  C. Johnson,et al.  Upper abdominal phase-contrast MR angiography: comparison of cine and non-cine techniques. , 1995, Radiology.

[17]  C. Roobottom,et al.  Significant disease of the celiac and superior mesenteric arteries in asymptomatic patients: predictive value of Doppler sonography. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  R. Edelman,et al.  USE OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY IN THE PRETRANSPLANT EVALUATION OF PORTAL VEIN PATHOLOGY , 1993, Transplantation.

[19]  N M Rofsky,et al.  Breath-hold single-dose gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR aortography: usefulness of a timing examination and MR power injector. , 1996, Radiology.

[20]  M Recht,et al.  Blood flow in the portal vein: velocity quantitation with phase-contrast MR angiography. , 1993, Radiology.

[21]  P. Robinson,et al.  Rapid dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the liver and portal vein. , 1993, The British journal of radiology.

[22]  T. Winter,et al.  Phase-contrast MR angiography of the portal venous system: preoperative findings in liver transplant recipients. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[23]  T. Winter,et al.  Hepatic arterial anatomy: demonstration of normal supply and vascular variants with three-dimensional CT angiography. , 1995, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[24]  G C McKinnon,et al.  Breath-hold, contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography. , 1996, Radiology.

[25]  G. Alexander,et al.  A comparison of MR and duplex Doppler ultrasound for vascular assessment prior to orthotopic liver transplantation. , 1994, Clinical radiology.

[26]  L. Axel,et al.  Breath-hold ultrafast three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the aorta and the renal and other visceral abdominal arteries. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.