The influence of sensory information on patch residence time in wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae)

Foraging models emphasize reward and/or prey capture rates as primary determinants of residence time. The influence of sensory information has rarely been examined experimentally, but may also be important in animal foraging decisions. This study examined the influence of sensory cues without food reward on residence time in wolf spiders, as well as the interaction of visual and vibratory information in foraging decisions. It also elucidated the eVects of prior sensory experience on foraging decisions in wolf spiders. Sixty mature females of the common wolf spider, Schizocosa ocreata (Hentz), were tested in a four-chambered artificial foraging patch. Patches varied in the type of sensory information provided by live prey as follows: visual stimuli alone, vibratory stimuli alone, visual and vibratory stimuli together and control (no stimuli). Spiders were allowed to move freely from chamber to chamber for one hour while the duration, number and sequence of patch visits were recorded. Sensory cues, even without food rewards, are suYcient criteria to influence residence time. Spiders tended to remain longer in patches with visual cues alone or visual and vibratory cues together over those with vibratory information alone. Individuals varied significantly in both residence time and sensory biases between individuals, but none showed evidence of using prior sensory experience to choose patches or modify patch residence duration. ? 1996 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour

[1]  G. Uetz,et al.  SURVIVORSHIP OF WOLF SPIDERS (LYCOSIDAE ) REARED ON DIFFERENT DIET S , 1992 .

[2]  E. T. Segura,et al.  The tale of the screaming hairy armadillo, the guinea pig and the marginal value theorem , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[3]  David W. Stephens,et al.  On the economics of sit-and-wait foraging: site selection and assessment , 1995 .

[4]  G. Uetz,et al.  Foraging strategies of spiders. , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[5]  D. H. Morse,et al.  Experimental and Observational Studies of Patch Choice at Different Scales by the Crab Spider Misumena Vatia , 1982 .

[6]  G. Sonerud,et al.  Auditory prey location in a pause—travel predator: search height, search time, and attack range of Tengmalm's owls (Aegolius funereus) , 1992 .

[7]  T. Valone,et al.  Patch estimation by group foragers: what information is used? , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  G. Uetz,et al.  Communication via substratum-coupled stridulation and reproductive isolation in wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae) , 1983, Animal Behaviour.

[9]  S. Healy,et al.  Spatial memory of paridae: comparison of a storing and a non-storing species, the coal tit, Parus ater, and the great tit, P. major , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  A I Houston,et al.  Memory and the efficient use of information. , 1987, Journal of theoretical biology.

[11]  F. Barth,et al.  Neurobiology of Arachnids , 1985, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[12]  J. Krebs,et al.  Starlings exploiting patches: the effect of recent experience on foraging decisions , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[13]  S. Riechert.  Thoughts on the Ecological Significance of Spiders , 1974 .

[14]  H. Shaffer,et al.  Aquatic prey capture in ambystomatid salamanders: Patterns of variation in muscle activity , 1985, Journal of morphology.

[15]  T. Caraco,et al.  Risk‐Sensitivity: Foraging Mode in an Ambush Predator , 1986 .

[16]  D. Wise.  Spiders in Ecological Webs: References , 1993 .

[17]  G. Uetz,et al.  Acoustic Communication and Reproductive Isolation in Two Species of Wolf Spiders , 1981, Science.

[18]  E. Charnov.  Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. , 1976, Theoretical population biology.

[19]  S. Riechert.  Decisions in Multiple Goal Contexts: Habitat Selection of the Spider, Agelenopsis aperta (Gertsch) , 1985 .

[20]  Kinya Nishimura,et al.  Decision Making of a Sit-and-Wait Forager in an Uncertain Environment: Learning and Memory Load , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[21]  J. Rovner.  EVIDENCE FOR IDIOTHETICALLY CONTROLLED TURNS AN D EXTRAOCULAR PHOTORECEPTION IN LYCOSID SPIDER S , 1991 .

[22]  Michael F. Land,et al.  The Morphology and Optics of Spider Eyes , 1985 .

[23]  J. McNamara.  Optimal patch use in a stochastic environment , 1982 .

[24]  B. J. Cockrell,et al.  Predator ingestion rate and its bearing on feeding time and the theory of oprimal diets , 1978 .

[25]  J. Krebs,et al.  Hunting by expectation or optimal foraging: A study of patch use by chickadees , 1974 .

[26]  A. F. Bennett,et al.  Foraging Strategy and Metabolic Rate in Spiders , 1980 .

[27]  K. Nishimura.  Optimal patch residence time of a sit-and-wait forager , 1991 .

[28]  W. Tietjen.  TESTS FOR OLFACTORY COMMUNICATION IN FOU R SPECIES OF WOLF SPIDERS (ARANEAE, LYCOSIDAE) 1 , 1979 .

[29]  A. F. Bennett,et al.  Muscle recruitment during terrestrial locomotion : how speed and temperature affect fibre type use in a lizard , 1990 .

[30]  S. Young,et al.  Visually guided feeding behaviour in the filter feeding cladoceran, Daphaia magna , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[31]  J. Endler.  Signals, Signal Conditions, and the Direction of Evolution , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[32]  G. Uetz.  Habitat structure and spider foraging , 1991 .

[33]  Michael J. Ford,et al.  Locomotory activity and the predation strategy of the of the wolf-spider Pardosa amentata (Clerck) (Lycosidae) , 1978, Animal Behaviour.

[34]  P. Wainwright.  Prey Processing in Haemulid Fishes: Patterns of Variation in Pharyngeal Jaw Muscle Activity , 1989 .

[35]  A. Sih.  Optimal Foraging: Partial Consumption of Prey , 1980, The American Naturalist.

[36]  G. Uetz,et al.  THE INHERITANCE OF COURTSHIP BEHAVIOR AND ITS ROLE AS A REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATING MECHANISM IN TWO SPECIES OF SCHIZOCOSA WOLF SPIDERS (ARANEAE; LYCOSIDAE) , 1986, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[37]  Enigmatic cohabitation in bowl and doily spiders, Frontinella pyramitela (Araneae, Linyphiidae) , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[38]  A. Cady.  MICROHABITAT SELECTION AND LOCOMOTOR ACTIVIT Y OF SCHIZOCOSA OCREATA (WALCKENAER) (ARANEAE : LYCOSIDAE) , 1984 .

[39]  K. Miyashita.  Effects of Locomotory Activity, Temperature and Hunger on the Respiratory Rate of Lycosa T-insignita BOES. et STR. (Araneae : Lycosidae) , 1969 .

[40]  W. Aspey.  Wolf spider sociobiology: I. Agonistic display and dominance-subordinance relations in adult male Schizocosa crassipes. , 1977, Behaviour.

[41]  J. H. Zar,et al.  Biostatistical Analysis (5th Edition) , 1984 .

[42]  Robert A. Johnson.  Learning, Memory, and Foraging Efficiency in Two Species of Desert Seed‐Harvester Ants , 1991 .

[43]  Richard F. Green,et al.  Bayesian birds: A simple example of Oaten's stochastic model of optimal foraging , 1980 .

[44]  Wolf spider sociobiology: II. Density parameters influencing agonistic behavior in Schizocosa crassipes. , 1977, Behaviour.

[45]  G. Uetz,et al.  Sexual selection, male morphology, and the efficacy of courtship signalling in two wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae) , 1996, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[46]  A. Houston,et al.  Optimal foraging and learning , 1985 .

[47]  Thomas J. Valone,et al.  Measuring Patch Assessment Abilities of Desert Granivores , 1989 .

[48]  F. Barth.  Chapter 3 Spiders and Vibratory Signals: Sensory Reception and Behavioral Significance , 1982 .

[49]  Thomas J. Valone,et al.  Bayesian and prescient assessment: foraging with pre-harvest information , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[50]  S. Riechert,et al.  Spiders as Biological Control Agents , 1984 .

[51]  J. Rovner,et al.  Nocturnal capture of fireflies by lycosid spiders: visual versus vibratory stimuli , 1988, Animal Behaviour.