Independent discussion sections for improving inferential reproducibility in published research
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] K. Pryor,et al. Electroencephalography-guided anaesthetic administration does not impact postoperative delirium among older adults undergoing major surgery: an independent discussion of the ENGAGES trial. , 2019, British journal of anaesthesia.
[2] J. Ioannidis,et al. Hypnotic depth and postoperative death: a Bayesian perspective and an Independent Discussion of a clinical trial. , 2019, British journal of anaesthesia.
[3] J. R. Sneyd. Who watches the watchmen and the problem of recursive flea bites. , 2019, British journal of anaesthesia.
[4] M. Vassar,et al. Presence of 'spin' in the abstracts and titles of anaesthesiology randomised controlled trials. , 2019, British journal of anaesthesia.
[5] S. Hernández-Díaz,et al. Use of haloperidol versus atypical antipsychotics and risk of in-hospital death in patients with acute myocardial infarction: cohort study , 2018, British Medical Journal.
[6] S. Houterman,et al. Effect of Haloperidol on Survival Among Critically Ill Adults With a High Risk of Delirium: The REDUCE Randomized Clinical Trial , 2018, JAMA.
[7] M. Cunha,et al. Effectiveness of haloperidol prophylaxis in critically ill patients with a high risk of delirium: a systematic review , 2017, JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports.
[8] John P. A. Ioannidis,et al. What does research reproducibility mean? , 2016, Science Translational Medicine.
[9] S. Kheterpal,et al. Reporting of Observational Research in ANESTHESIOLOGY: The Importance of the Analysis Plan. , 2016, Anesthesiology.
[10] John Fletcher,et al. Sharing Clinical Trial Data: A Proposal from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors , 2016, PLoS medicine.
[11] John P. A. Ioannidis,et al. Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature , 2016, PLoS biology.
[12] S. Zuidema,et al. The Mortality Risk of Conventional Antipsychotics in Elderly Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials. , 2015, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association.
[13] L. Schneider,et al. Antipsychotics, other psychotropics, and the risk of death in patients with dementia: number needed to harm. , 2015, JAMA psychiatry.
[14] Yongfeng Huang,et al. A Fuzzy Computing Model for Identifying Polarity of Chinese Sentiment Words , 2015, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..
[15] D. Curran‐Everett,et al. The fickle P value generates irreproducible results , 2015, Nature Methods.
[16] Jordan D Dworkin,et al. Data interpretation in analgesic clinical trials with statistically nonsignificant primary analyses: an ACTTION systematic review. , 2015, The journal of pain : official journal of the American Pain Society.
[17] Petroc Sumner,et al. The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: retrospective observational study , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[18] John P. A. Ioannidis,et al. How to Make More Published Research True , 2014, PLoS medicine.
[19] Paul J. Wang,et al. Association Between Success Rate and Citation Count of Studies of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Possible Evidence of Citation Bias , 2014, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.
[20] Mika Kivimäki,et al. Don't Let the Truth Get in the Way of a Good Story: An Illustration of Citation Bias in Epidemiologic Research , 2014, American journal of epidemiology.
[21] K. Huybrechts,et al. Comparative mortality risks of antipsychotic medications in community-dwelling older adults. , 2014, The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science.
[22] H. Yazici,et al. There was less self-critique among basic than in clinical science articles in three rheumatology journals. , 2014, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[23] H. Atmanspacher,et al. Relevance relations for the concept of reproducibility , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.
[24] J. Saczynski,et al. Delirium in elderly people , 2014, The Lancet.
[25] Regina Nuzzo,et al. Scientific method: Statistical errors , 2014, Nature.
[26] F. Collins,et al. Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility , 2014, Nature.
[27] R. Tibshirani,et al. Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis , 2014, The Lancet.
[28] A. Gross,et al. All That Glitters Isn't Gold: A Survey on Acknowledgment of Limitations in Biomedical Studies , 2013, PloS one.
[29] Victor M Montori,et al. Synthesizing evidence: shifting the focus from individual studies to the body of evidence. , 2013, JAMA.
[30] Johannes B Reitsma,et al. Overinterpretation and misreporting of diagnostic accuracy studies: evidence of "spin". , 2013, Radiology.
[31] T. Perneger,et al. Citation bias favoring statistically significant studies was present in medical research. , 2013, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[32] Isabelle Boutron,et al. Misrepresentation of Randomized Controlled Trials in Press Releases and News Coverage: A Cohort Study , 2012, PLoS medicine.
[33] E. Akl,et al. Discussing study limitations in reports of biomedical studies- the need for more transparency , 2012, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes.
[34] Manabu Torii,et al. A Hybrid Approach to Sentiment Sentence Classification in Suicide Notes , 2012, Biomedical informatics insights.
[35] Sergio Sismondo,et al. Industry sponsorship and research outcome. , 2012, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
[36] Catherine Sabourin,et al. Word associations contribute to machine learning in automatic scoring of degree of emotional tones in dream reports , 2011, Consciousness and Cognition.
[37] J. Lynn,et al. Clarity and strength of implications for practice in medical journal articles: an exploratory analysis , 2011, Quality and Safety in Health Care.
[38] D. Altman,et al. Inadequate post-publication review of medical research , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[39] Sally Hopewell,et al. Clinical trials should begin and end with systematic reviews of relevant evidence: 12 years and waiting , 2010, The Lancet.
[40] Douglas G Altman,et al. Reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically nonsignificant results for primary outcomes. , 2010, JAMA.
[41] D. Altman,et al. Preparing raw clinical data for publication: guidance for journal editors, authors, and peer reviewers , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[42] D. Moher,et al. A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research , 2010, European journal of clinical investigation.
[43] John P A Ioannidis,et al. Overinterpretation of clinical applicability in molecular diagnostic research. , 2009, Clinical chemistry.
[44] S. Goodman. A dirty dozen: twelve p-value misconceptions. , 2008, Seminars in hematology.
[45] Gordon H Guyatt,et al. In the Era of Systematic Reviews, Does the Size of an Individual Trial Still Matter? , 2008, PLoS medicine.
[46] Y. Kats. Towards NLP-based psychological evaluation. , 2007, AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium.
[47] Lisa Bero,et al. Factors Associated with Findings of Published Trials of Drug–Drug Comparisons: Why Some Statins Appear More Efficacious than Others , 2007, PLoS medicine.
[48] M. Clarke,et al. Reports of clinical trials should begin and end with up-to-date systematic reviews of other relevant evidence: a status report , 2007, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.
[49] John P A Ioannidis,et al. Limitations are not properly acknowledged in the scientific literature. , 2007, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[50] S. Goodman,et al. Reproducible Research: Moving toward Research the Public Can Really Trust , 2007, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[51] Gordon H Guyatt,et al. Users' guide to detecting misleading claims in clinical research reports , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[52] Mike Clarke,et al. Discussion sections in reports of controlled trials published in general medical journals. , 2002, JAMA.
[53] S. Goodman,et al. Of P-values and Bayes: a modest proposal. , 2001, Epidemiology.
[54] S. Goodman. Toward Evidence-Based Medical Statistics. 1: The P Value Fallacy , 1999, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[55] I Chalmers,et al. Discussion sections in reports of controlled trials published in general medical journals: islands in search of continents? , 1998, JAMA.
[56] I. Olkin,et al. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. , 1996, JAMA.
[57] S. Goodman,et al. Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine , 1994, Annals of Internal Medicine.