Lightweight Deployment-Aware Scheduling for Wireless Sensor Networks

Wireless sensor networks consist of a large number of tiny sensors that have only limited energy supply. One of the major challenges in constructing such networks is to maintain long network lifetime as well as sufficient sensing areas. To achieve this goal, a broadly-used method is to turn off redundant sensors. In this paper, the problem of estimating redundant sensing areas among neighbouring wireless sensors is analysed. We present simple methods to estimate the degree of redundancy without the knowledge of location or directional information. We also provide tight upper and lower bounds on the probability of complete redundancy and on the average partial redundancy. With random sensor deployment, our analysis shows that partial redundancy is more realistic for real applications, as complete redundancy is expensive, requiring up to 11 neighbouring sensors to provide a 90 percent chance of complete redundancy. Based on the analysis, we propose a scalable Lightweight Deployment-Aware Scheduling (LDAS) algorithm, which turns off redundant sensors without using accurate location information. Simulation study demonstrates that the LDAS algorithm can reduce network energy consumption and provide desired QoS requirement effectively.

[1]  Xue Zhang,et al.  Topology Control for Wireless Sensor Networks , 2007 .

[2]  Guoliang Xing,et al.  Integrated coverage and connectivity configuration in wireless sensor networks , 2003, SenSys '03.

[3]  Gabor Karsai,et al.  Smart Dust: communicating with a cubic-millimeter computer , 2001 .

[4]  Yu-Chee Tseng,et al.  The Broadcast Storm Problem in a Mobile Ad Hoc Network , 2002, Wirel. Networks.

[5]  Joseph Y. Halpern,et al.  Minimum-energy mobile wireless networks revisited , 2001, ICC 2001. IEEE International Conference on Communications. Conference Record (Cat. No.01CH37240).

[6]  Nathan Ickes,et al.  Physical layer driven protocol and algorithm design for energy-efficient wireless sensor networks , 2001, MobiCom '01.

[7]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Sensor Networks , 2002, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[8]  Di Tian,et al.  A coverage-preserving node scheduling scheme for large wireless sensor networks , 2002, WSNA '02.

[9]  Nael B. Abu-Ghazaleh,et al.  Infrastructure tradeoffs for sensor networks , 2002, WSNA '02.

[10]  Ivan Stojmenovic,et al.  Position-based routing in ad hoc networks , 2002, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[11]  Yong Gao,et al.  Analysis on the redundancy of wireless sensor networks , 2003, WSNA '03.

[12]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Geography-informed energy conservation for Ad Hoc routing , 2001, MobiCom '01.

[13]  C.C. Enz,et al.  A low-power low-voltage transceiver architecture suitable for wireless distributed sensors network , 2000, 2000 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems. Emerging Technologies for the 21st Century. Proceedings (IEEE Cat No.00CH36353).

[14]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Next Century Challenges: Mobile Networking for Smart Dust , 1999, MobiCom 1999.

[15]  R. Srikant,et al.  Unreliable sensor grids: coverage, connectivity and diameter , 2005, Ad Hoc Networks.

[16]  Yu-Chee Tseng,et al.  The Broadcast Storm Problem in a Mobile Ad Hoc Network , 1999, Wirel. Networks.

[17]  David E. Culler,et al.  A Network-Centric Approach to Embedded Software for Tiny Devices , 2001, EMSOFT.

[18]  David E. Culler,et al.  System architecture directions for networked sensors , 2000, SIGP.

[19]  Robert Tappan Morris,et al.  Span: An Energy-Efficient Coordination Algorithm for Topology Maintenance in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks , 2002, Wirel. Networks.

[20]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Directed diffusion: a scalable and robust communication paradigm for sensor networks , 2000, MobiCom '00.

[21]  Panganamala Ramana Kumar,et al.  The Number of Neighbors Needed for Connectivity of Wireless Networks , 2004, Wirel. Networks.