Open access to novel dual flow chamber technology for in vitro cell mechanotransduction, toxicity and pharamacokinetic studies

BackgroundA major stumbling block for researchers developing experimental models of mechanotransduction is the control of experimental variables, in particular the transmission of the mechanical forces at the cellular level. A previous evaluation of state of the art commercial perfusion chambers showed that flow regimes, applied to impart a defined mechanical stimulus to cells, are poorly controlled and that data from studies in which different chambers are utilized can not be compared, even if the target stress regimes are comparable.MethodsThis study provides a novel chamber design to provide both physiologically-based flow regimes, improvements in control of experimental variables, as well as ease of use compared to commercial chambers. This novel design achieves controlled stresses through five gasket designs and both single- and dual-flow regimes.ResultsThe imparted shear stress within the gasket geometry is well controlled. Fifty percent of the entire area of the 10 × 21 mm universal gasket (Gasket I, designed to impart constant magnitude shear stresses in the center of the chamber where outcome measures are taken), is exposed to target stresses. In the 8 mm diameter circular area at the center of the chamber (where outcome measures are made), over 92% of the area is exposed to the target stress (± 2.5%). In addition, other gasket geometries provide specific gradients of stress that vary with distance from the chamber inlet. Bench-top testing of the novel chamber prototype shows improvements, in the ease of use as well as in performance, compared to the other commercial chambers. The design of the chamber eliminates flow deviations due to leakage and bubbles and allows actual flow profiles to better conform with those predicted in computational models.ConclusionThe novel flow chamber design provides predictable and well defined mechanical forces at the surface of a cell monolayer, showing improvement over previously tested commercial chambers. The predictability of the imparted stress improves both experiment repeatability as well as the accuracy of inter-study comparisons. Carefully controlling the stresses on cells is critical in effectively mimicking in vivo situations. Overall, the improved perfusion flow chamber provides the needed resolution, standardization and in vitro model analogous to in vivo conditions to make the step towards greater use in research and the opportunity to enter the diagnostic and therapeutic market.

[1]  S. Greenwald,et al.  The development of an in-vitro perfusion system for studies on cultured cells. , 1992, International journal of experimental pathology.

[2]  M. Gimbrone,et al.  Vascular endothelium responds to fluid shear stress gradients. , 1992, Arteriosclerosis and thrombosis : a journal of vascular biology.

[3]  J. Ando,et al.  Shear stress inhibits adhesion of cultured mouse endothelial cells to lymphocytes by downregulating VCAM-1 expression. , 1994, The American journal of physiology.

[4]  C. Hung,et al.  Real‐Time Calcium Response of Cultured Bone Cells to Fluid Flow , 1995, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  H. C. van der Mei,et al.  Use of flow chamber devices and image analysis methods to study microbial adhesion. , 1995, Methods in enzymology.

[6]  L. Picker,et al.  CD44 and its ligand hyaluronate mediate rolling under physiologic flow: a novel lymphocyte-endothelial cell primary adhesion pathway , 1996, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[7]  H J Donahue,et al.  Differential effect of steady versus oscillating flow on bone cells. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  N Harbeck,et al.  Spatial and temporal regulation of gap junction connexin43 in vascular endothelial cells exposed to controlled disturbed flows in vitro. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  C F Dewey,et al.  Vascular endothelial cells respond to spatial gradients in fluid shear stress by enhanced activation of transcription factors. , 1999, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[10]  C. Jacobs,et al.  Mechanisms contributing to fluid‐flow‐induced Ca2+ mobilization in articular chondrocytes , 1999, Journal of cellular physiology.

[11]  Analog Vlsi,et al.  On the Design of , 2000 .

[12]  C. Hung,et al.  Serum modulates the intracellular calcium response of primary cultured bone cells to shear flow. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  M. U. Nollert,et al.  Leukocyte-leukocyte interactions mediated by platelet microparticles under flow. , 2000, Blood.

[14]  M. K. Knothe Tate,et al.  An ex vivo model to study transport processes and fluid flow in loaded bone. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  T M Keaveny,et al.  Osteoblasts respond to pulsatile fluid flow with short-term increases in PGE(2) but no change in mineralization. , 2001, Journal of applied physiology.

[16]  Richard S Larson,et al.  Improvements to parallel plate flow chambers to reduce reagent and cellular requirements , 2001, BMC Immunology.

[17]  S. Weinbaum,et al.  Shear stress induces a time- and position-dependent increase in endothelial cell membrane fluidity. , 2001, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[18]  R. Grebe,et al.  A new flow chamber for the study of shear stress and transmural pressure upon cells adhering to a porous biomaterial. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[19]  Walter Herzog,et al.  Rabbit tendon cells produce MMP-3 in response to fluid flow without significant calcium transients. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  Melissa L Knothe Tate,et al.  "Whither flows the fluid in bone?" An osteocyte's perspective. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  R. Alon,et al.  A real time in vitro assay for studying leukocyte transendothelial migration under physiological flow conditions. , 2003, Journal of immunological methods.

[22]  Kay C Dee,et al.  Mechanisms of surface-tension-induced epithelial cell damage in a model of pulmonary airway reopening. , 2003, Journal of applied physiology.

[23]  Christopher R Jacobs,et al.  Osteoblastic cells have refractory periods for fluid-flow-induced intracellular calcium oscillations for short bouts of flow and display multiple low-magnitude oscillations during long-term flow. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  P. Gallagher,et al.  Fluid shear stress inhibits TNF‐α‐induced apoptosis in osteoblasts: A role for fluid shear stress‐induced activation of PI3‐kinase and inhibition of caspase‐3 , 2003, Journal of cellular physiology.

[25]  A. Flozak,et al.  Lamellipodial motility in wounded endothelial cells exposed to physiologic flow is associated with different patterns of β1‐integrin and vinculin localization , 2003, Journal of cellular physiology.

[26]  Melissa L. Knothe Tate,et al.  Whither flows the fluid in bone?" An osteocyte's perspective. , 2003 .

[27]  Y. Yoshizawa,et al.  Solid-phase crystallization behaviors of in situ phosphorous-doped amorphous silicon films deposited using Si2H6 and PH3 , 2003 .

[28]  M. Essig,et al.  Shear-stress-responsive signal transduction mechanisms in renal proximal tubule cells , 2003, Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension.

[29]  Melissa L Knothe Tate,et al.  "Culture shock" from the bone cell's perspective: emulating physiological conditions for mechanobiological investigations. , 2004, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[30]  Eric J. Anderson,et al.  Nano–Microscale Models of Periosteocytic Flow Show Differences in Stresses Imparted to Cell Body and Processes , 2005, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[31]  Eric J. Anderson,et al.  The imperative for controlled mechanical stresses in unraveling cellular mechanisms of mechanotransduction , 2006, Biomedical engineering online.

[32]  J. Olivo-Marin,et al.  Cerebral microcirculation shear stress levels determine Neisseria meningitidis attachment sites along the blood–brain barrier , 2006, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[33]  L. McIntire,et al.  A Validated System for Simulating Common Carotid Arterial Flow In Vitro: Alteration of Endothelial Cell Response , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[34]  T. Fujiwara,et al.  Impact of convective flow on the cellular uptake and transfection activity of lipoplex and adenovirus. , 2006, Biological & pharmaceutical bulletin.

[35]  G. Truskey,et al.  Normal and shear stresses influence the spatial distribution of intracellular adhesion molecule-1 expression in human umbilical vein endothelial cells exposed to sudden expansion flow. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[36]  Eric J Anderson,et al.  Design of tissue engineering scaffolds as delivery devices for mechanical and mechanically modulated signals. , 2007, Tissue engineering.

[37]  Sarah H. McBride ELUCIDATING BIOPHYSICAL CUES CONDUCIVE TO TARGETED MULTIPOTENT CELL DIFFERENTIATION , 2008 .