The Feasibility of Low Concentration Targets: An Application of FUND

Abstract This paper studies the feasibility of stringent targets for stabilizing ambient greenhouse gas concentrations using the FUND model. 170,000 policy scenarios were run, systematically varying the price of carbon, participation in climate policy, the strength of the climate feedback on the terrestrial carbon cycle, the no policy scenario, and the abatement costs. The results reveal the following. Climate policy has diminishing returns, and there is therefore a maximum to what can be achieved. The success of climate policy is hampered if, as is likely, the terrestrial biosphere turns from a carbon sink to a carbon source because of climate change. All major countries have to reduce their emissions in order to meet the more ambitious stabilization targets. The cost of climate policy would be lower if the stabilization target can be exceeded in the interim. The EU target of 2 °C warming above pre-industrial is infeasible under almost all assumptions. A cost–benefit analysis would endorse a target of 4.5 W m − 2 (but not much stricter than that) if all major emitters engage in abatement. Under the same condition, the median US voter would support a 3.7 W m − 2 target (but not much stricter than that). International permit trade would encourage large developing countries to reduce their emissions, but the trade flows would be substantial relative to product trade and much larger than official development aid.

[1]  R. Tol Spatial and Temporal Efficiency in Climate Policy: Applications of FUND , 1999 .

[2]  F. Ruane,et al.  Location Choices of the Pharmaceutical Industry in Europe after 1992 , 2007 .

[3]  Bas Eickhout,et al.  Long-Term Multi-Gas Scenarios to Stabilise Radiative Forcing - Exploring Costs and Benefits Within an Integrated Assessment Framework , 2006 .

[4]  Richard G. Newell,et al.  Modeling endogenous technological change for climate policy analysis , 2008 .

[5]  K. Hasselmann,et al.  Transport and storage of CO2 in the ocean ——an inorganic ocean-circulation carbon cycle model , 1987 .

[6]  R. Betts,et al.  Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing. Chapter 2 , 2007 .

[7]  Richard S.J. Tol,et al.  The marginal damage costs of carbon-dioxide emissions’ , 2005 .

[8]  H. L. Miller,et al.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis , 2007 .

[9]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change 1992 : the supplementary report to the IPCC scientific assessment , 1992 .

[10]  W. Nordhaus Economic Growth and Climate: The Carbon Dioxide Problem , 1976 .

[11]  Iulia Siedschlag,et al.  Is FDI into China Crowding Out the FDI into the European Union , 2008 .

[12]  R. Tol Biased Policy Advice from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .

[13]  John P. Weyant,et al.  On the sources of technological change: What do the models assume , 2008 .

[14]  R. Dickinson,et al.  Couplings between changes in the climate system and biogeochemistry , 2007 .

[15]  Mnv,et al.  The IMAGE 2.2 implementation of the SRES scenarios; A comprehensive analysis of emissions, climate change and impacts in the 21st century , 2001 .

[16]  L. Clarke,et al.  International climate policy architectures: Overview of the EMF 22 International Scenarios , 2009 .

[17]  Richard S. J. Tol,et al.  Marginal abatement costs of greenhouse gas emissions: A meta-analysis , 2009 .

[18]  O. Edenhofer,et al.  Mitigation from a cross-sectoral perspective , 2007 .

[19]  Valentina Bosetti,et al.  Climate Change Mitigation Strategies in Fast-Growing Countries: The Benefits of Early Action , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[20]  R. Tol The Social Cost of Carbon: Trends, Outliers and Catastrophes , 2008 .

[21]  Michel G.J. den Elzen,et al.  Multi-gas emission envelopes to meet greenhouse gas concentration targets: Costs versus certainty of limiting temperature increase , 2007 .

[22]  John C. V. Pezzey,et al.  Optimal intensity targets for greenhouse gas emissions trading under uncertainty , 2007 .

[23]  Donald J. Wuebbles,et al.  Radiative forcing of climate , 1991 .

[24]  Michel G.J. den Elzen,et al.  Abatement costs of post-Kyoto climate regimes , 2005 .

[25]  Robert P. Berrens,et al.  Would developing country commitments affect US households' support for a modified Kyoto Protocol? , 2004 .

[26]  An emission intensity protocol for climate change: An application of FUND , 2004 .

[27]  R. Tol,et al.  A no cap but trade proposal for emission targets , 2008 .

[28]  R. Zeckhauser,et al.  The Perception and Valuation of the Risks of Climate Change: A Rational and Behavioral Blend , 2005 .

[29]  T. Cameron,et al.  Popular Support for Climate Change Mitigation: Evidence from a General Population Mail Survey , 2008 .

[30]  Marshall A. Wise,et al.  Implications for the USA of stabilization of radiative forcing at 3.4 W/m2 , 2008 .

[31]  Alexei G. Sankovski,et al.  Special report on emissions scenarios , 2000 .

[32]  J. Edmonds,et al.  Stabilizing CO2 concentrations with incomplete international cooperation , 2008 .

[33]  J. Walsh,et al.  Tax Structure and Female Labour Market Participation: Evidence from Ireland , 2007, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[34]  A. Michaelowa,et al.  Climate or development: is ODA diverted from its original purpose? , 2007 .

[35]  K. Shine Radiative Forcing of Climate Change , 2000 .

[36]  R. Tol Estimates of the Damage Costs of Climate Change. Part 1: Benchmark Estimates , 2002 .

[37]  M. Schlesinger,et al.  A sequential-decision strategy for abating climate change , 1992, Nature.

[38]  Carlo Carraro,et al.  Equity, Development, and Climate Change Control , 2003 .

[39]  R. Tol,et al.  Environmental accounts for the republic of Ireland: 1990-2005 , 2008 .

[40]  H. Hotelling The economics of exhaustible resources , 1931, Journal of Political Economy.

[41]  Richard S. J. Tol,et al.  Multi-Gas Emission Reduction for Climate Change Policy: An Application of Fund , 2006 .

[42]  R. Tol,et al.  Environmental accounts for the Republic of Ireland , 2008 .