Conflicts between recovery objectives: The case of housing reconstruction after the 2003 earthquake in Bam, Iran

Abstract Disaster management studies have demonstrated that housing reconstruction programs often contain conflicting objectives. Yet, insufficient knowledge still exists about how conflicts between objectives appear and escalate during the reconstruction process. The purpose of this article is to explain the causes and consequences of these conflicts and to reveal how recovery programs can prevent them. After developing the analytical framework of underlying and intensifying factors of conflicting objectives , this qualitative inquiry examines the housing reconstruction program conducted after the 2003 earthquake in Bam. Empirical results show three sets of conflicts between economic, social, cultural, and built environment objectives, and reveal how they led to repeating simple modular housing units, which partially destroyed a rich and historic architectural landscape, ignoring households’ needs, identities, culture, and traditions and damaging irreversibly Bam's unique urban fabric. Results reveal unsolved controversies in the post-disaster reconstruction field and the lack of participatory decision-making before disasters as the underlying factors of such conflicting objectives. On the other hand, conflicts between stakeholders as well as challenges in participation processes during the reconstruction process intensified conflicts between recovery objectives. Findings recommend preventing the rapid establishment of new organizations in the post-disaster stage and finding a balance between professionals’ and lay community's knowledge to fulfill short and long-term recovery objectives.

[1]  James W. Dean,et al.  The Relationship between Procedural Rationality and Political Behavior in Strategic Decision Making , 1993 .

[2]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[3]  J. Kahan,et al.  From Flood Control to Integrated Water Resource Management , 2006 .

[4]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs , 1976 .

[5]  Mahmood Hosseini,et al.  Post-Bam earthquake: recovery and reconstruction , 2008 .

[6]  Cassidy Johnson,et al.  Managing institutional fragmentation and time compression in post-disaster reconstruction – the case of Bam , 2017 .

[7]  E. Morin From the concept of system to the paradigm of complexity , 1992 .

[8]  Robert Y. Cavana,et al.  Towards a new framework for evaluating systemic problem structuring methods , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  C. Ansell,et al.  Handbook on Theories of Governance , 2016 .

[10]  David Alexander,et al.  Recovery from Disaster , 2015 .

[11]  J. Innes,et al.  Planning with Complexity : An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy , 2018 .

[12]  Amy R. Poteete,et al.  Working Together: Collective Action, the Commons, and Multiple Methods in Practice , 2010 .

[13]  Joseph Ashmore,et al.  The Meaning of Build Back Better: Evidence from Post-Tsunami Aceh and Sri Lanka , 2008 .

[14]  J. Innes,et al.  Reframing public participation: strategies for the 21st century , 2004 .

[15]  Ayyoob Sharifi,et al.  Changes in the traditional urban form and the social sustainability of contemporary cities: A case study of Iranian cities , 2013 .

[16]  Miley W. Merkhofer Decision Science and Social Risk Management: A Comparative Evaluation of Cost-Benefit Analysis, Decision Analysis, and Other Formal Decision-Aiding Approaches , 1986 .

[17]  G. Rowe,et al.  Evaluating Public-Participation Exercises: A Research Agenda , 2004 .

[18]  C. Ozawa Planning Resilient Communities: Insights from Experiences with Risky Technologies , 2011 .

[19]  Babak Omidvar,et al.  Reconstruction management policies in residential and commercial sectors after the 2003 bam earthquake in Iran , 2010 .

[20]  Kim Hua Tan,et al.  Linking Objectives to Actions: A Decision Support Approach Based on Cause-Effect Linkages , 2003, Decis. Sci..

[21]  C. Hwang Multiple Objective Decision Making - Methods and Applications: A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1979 .

[22]  John Ward,et al.  Towards understanding participatory processes: Framework, application and results. , 2015, Journal of environmental management.

[23]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[24]  Thomas J. Campanella Urban Resilience and the Recovery of New Orleans , 2006 .

[25]  Theo Schilderman,et al.  Building Back Better: Delivering people-centred housing reconstruction at scale , 2010 .

[26]  R. Pendall,et al.  Resilience and Regions: Building Understanding ofthe Metaphor , 2010 .

[27]  Arthur Upham Pope Introducing Persian architecture , 1976 .

[28]  S. Arnstein,et al.  Ladder of Citizen Participation , 2020 .

[29]  M. Castells,et al.  Information Technology, Globalization and Social Development , 1999 .

[30]  P. Wilkinson,et al.  Assessing the growing impact of the global economy on urban development in Southern African cities , 2002 .

[31]  J. Frieden Global Capitalism: Its Fall and Rise in the Twentieth Century , 2006 .

[32]  The role of post-disaster public policy responses in housing recovery of tenants , 2013 .

[33]  Cassidy Johnson Strategic planning for post-disaster temporary housing. , 2007, Disasters.

[34]  Ahoura Meskinazarian Social resilience of post-earthquake Bam , 2012 .

[35]  Ilan Kelman,et al.  Handbook of Hazards and Disaster Risk Reduction , 2012 .

[36]  Thomas C. Beierle Democracy in Practice: Public Participation in Environmental Decisions , 2010 .

[37]  Robert Pindyck,et al.  Optimal economic stabilization policies under decentralized control and conflicting objectives , 1976, 1976 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control including the 15th Symposium on Adaptive Processes.

[38]  Lamberto Cesari,et al.  Optimization-Theory And Applications , 1983 .

[39]  A Oliver-Smith,et al.  Post-disaster housing reconstruction and social inequality: a challenge to policy and practice. , 1990, Disasters.

[40]  Mary C. Comerio,et al.  Housing Recovery Lessons From Chile , 2014 .

[41]  Carolyn Hayles,et al.  An examination of decision making in post disaster housing reconstruction , 2010 .

[42]  Florian Steinberg,et al.  Housing reconstruction and rehabilitation in Aceh and Nias, Indonesia—Rebuilding lives☆ , 2007 .

[43]  Judith E. Innes,et al.  Outcomes of Collaborative Water Policy Making: Applying Complexity Thinking to Evaluation , 2001 .

[44]  S. Sassen The global city: introducing a concept , 2005 .

[45]  Johannes I.M. Halman,et al.  Innovation and interorganizational cooperation: a synthesis of literature , 2009 .

[46]  Allreza Fallahi Lessons Learned from the Housing Reconstruction Following the Bam Earthquake in Iran , 2007 .

[47]  C. González-Vallejo Making trade-offs: a probabilistic and context-sensitive model of choice behavior. , 2002, Psychological review.

[48]  J. Beall Globalization and social exclusion in cities: framing the debate with lessons from Africa and Asia , 2002 .

[49]  Jennifer Duyne Barenstein,et al.  Housing reconstruction in post-earthquake Gujarat: A comparative analysis. , 2006 .

[50]  Michael X. Delli Carpini,et al.  Talking Together: Public Deliberation and Political Participation in America , 2009 .

[51]  Robin Gregory,et al.  Structured Decision Making: A Practical Guide to Environmental Management Choices , 2012 .

[52]  Cassidy Johnson,et al.  Truths and myths about community participation in post-disaster housing projects , 2007 .

[53]  Kim Haugbølle,et al.  Contradictions and collaboration: partnering in-between systems of production, values and interests , 2013 .

[54]  I. Young Inclusion and Democracy , 2002 .

[55]  C. King,et al.  The Question of Participation: Toward Authentic Public Participation in Public Administration , 1998 .

[56]  George Ofori,et al.  Enhancing integration and innovation in construction , 2002 .

[57]  D. Sanderson,et al.  Beyond shelter after disaster : practice, process and possibilities , 2013 .

[58]  R. Freeman Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .