Validation of Laboratory-Developed Molecular Assays for Infectious Diseases

SUMMARY Molecular technology has changed the way that clinical laboratories diagnose and manage many infectious diseases. Excellent sensitivity, specificity, and speed have made molecular assays an attractive alternative to culture or enzyme immunoassay methods. Many molecular assays are commercially available and FDA approved. Others, especially those that test for less common analytes, are often laboratory developed. Laboratories also often modify FDA-approved assays to include different extraction systems or additional specimen types. The Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) federal regulatory standards require clinical laboratories to establish and document their own performance specifications for laboratory-developed tests to ensure accurate and precise results prior to implementation of the test. The performance characteristics that must be established include accuracy, precision, reportable range, reference interval, analytical sensitivity, and analytical specificity. Clinical laboratories are challenged to understand the requirements and determine the types of experiments and analyses necessary to meet the requirements. A variety of protocols and guidelines are available in various texts and documents. Many of the guidelines are general and more appropriate for assays in chemistry sections of the laboratory but are applied in principle to molecular assays. This review presents information that laboratories may consider in their efforts to meet regulatory requirements.

[1]  M. Gulley,et al.  Recommended principles and practices for validating clinical molecular pathology tests. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[2]  T. Mazzulli,et al.  Validation of the TaqMan Influenza A Detection Kit and a rapid automated total nucleic acid extraction method to detect influenza A virus in nasopharyngeal specimens. , 2009, Annals of clinical and laboratory science.

[3]  M. Poljak,et al.  Detection and differentiation of human papillomavirus genotypes HPV-6 and HPV-11 by FRET-based real-time PCR. , 2008, Journal of virological methods.

[4]  Markus H. Antwerpen,et al.  Real-time PCR system targeting a chromosomal marker specific for Bacillus anthracis. , 2008, Molecular and cellular probes.

[5]  Roger Johnson,et al.  Assessment of bias with emphasis on method comparison. , 2008, The Clinical biochemist. Reviews.

[6]  C. Drosten,et al.  High throughput detection of Coxiella burnetii by real-time PCR with internal control system and automated DNA preparation , 2008, BMC Microbiology.

[7]  Ting Cai,et al.  Development and evaluation of real-time loop-mediated isothermal amplification for hepatitis B virus DNA quantification: a new tool for HBV management. , 2008, Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology.

[8]  S. Günther,et al.  Virus Detection and Monitoring of Viral Load in Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever Virus Patients , 2007, Emerging infectious diseases.

[9]  L. Sloan Real-time PCR in clinical microbiology: verification, validation, and contamination control , 2007 .

[10]  R. Kaiser,et al.  A novel internally controlled real-time reverse transcription-PCR assay for HIV-1 RNA targeting the pol integrase genomic region. , 2007, Journal of virological methods.

[11]  H. Kessler,et al.  Detection and Differentiation of Bordetella spp. by Real-Time PCR , 2006, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[12]  L. Sticchi,et al.  Performance testing of two new one-step real time PCR assays for detection of human influenza and avian influenza viruses isolated in humans and respiratory syncytial virus. , 2006, Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene.

[13]  R. Scheen,et al.  Development of a multiple internal control for clinical diagnostic real-time amplification assays. , 2006, FEMS immunology and medical microbiology.

[14]  J. Goedert,et al.  Real-Time PCR Assay for Detection and Quantification of Hepatitis B Virus Genotypes A to G , 2006, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[15]  K. Kleesiek,et al.  Enhanced Reverse Transcription-PCR Assay for Detection of Norovirus Genogroup I , 2006, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[16]  Christian Drosten,et al.  Ultrasensitive Monitoring of HIV-1 Viral Load by a Low-Cost Real-Time Reverse Transcription-PCR Assay with Internal Control for the 5′ Long Terminal Repeat Domain , 2006, Clinical chemistry.

[17]  G. Pauli,et al.  Real-time PCR detection of parapoxvirus DNA. , 2006, Clinical chemistry.

[18]  H. Ellerbrok,et al.  Highly sensitive real-time PCR for specific detection and quantification of Coxiella burnetii , 2006, BMC Microbiology.

[19]  T. F. Smith,et al.  Real-Time PCR in Clinical Microbiology: Applications for Routine Laboratory Testing , 2006, Clinical Microbiology Reviews.

[20]  W. Holzgreve,et al.  Optimized real-time quantitative PCR measurement of male fetal DNA in maternal plasma. , 2005, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[21]  K. Kleesiek,et al.  Use of Bacteriophage MS2 as an Internal Control in Viral Reverse Transcription-PCR Assays , 2005, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[22]  H. Meyer,et al.  Real-time PCR assay for the detection of tanapox virus and yaba-like disease virus , 2005, Journal of virological methods.

[23]  R. Tedder,et al.  Real-time PCR quantitation of hepatitis B virus DNA using automated sample preparation and murine cytomegalovirus internal control. , 2005, Journal of virological methods.

[24]  S. Shchelkunov,et al.  Real-Time PCR System for Detection of Orthopoxviruses and Simultaneous Identification of Smallpox Virus , 2004, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[25]  Sylvia Chong,et al.  Performance and Cost Evaluation of One Commercial andSix In-House Conventional and Real-Time ReverseTranscription-PCR Assays for Detection of Severe AcuteRespiratory SyndromeCoronavirus , 2004, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[26]  R. Tedder,et al.  Development and evaluation of an internally controlled semiautomated PCR assay for quantification of cell‐free cytomegalovirus , 2002, Journal of medical virology.

[27]  Stephen L. R. Ellison,et al.  Harmonized guidelines for single-laboratory validation of methods of analysis (IUPAC Technical Report) , 2002, Chemistry International.

[28]  E. Seifried,et al.  TaqMan 5′-Nuclease Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 PCR Assay with Phage-Packaged Competitive Internal Control for High-Throughput Blood Donor Screening , 2001, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[29]  Sarah M. Olson,et al.  An invasive cleavage assay for direct quantitation of specific RNAs , 2001, Nature Biotechnology.

[30]  K. Linnet,et al.  Necessary sample size for method comparison studies based on regression analysis. , 1999, Clinical chemistry.

[31]  R. Press Analyte-specific reagents. , 1999, Molecular diagnosis : a journal devoted to the understanding of human disease through the clinical application of molecular biology.

[32]  A. Ballagi-Pordány,et al.  The use of mimics as internal standards to avoid false negatives in diagnostic PCR. , 1996, Molecular and cellular probes.

[33]  P N Valenstein,et al.  Evaluating diagnostic tests with imperfect standards. , 1990, American journal of clinical pathology.

[34]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[35]  P. M. Clifford,et al.  The international vocabulary of basic and general terms in metrology , 1985 .

[36]  Jean Amos Wilson Verification and validation of multiplex nucleic acid assays , 2008 .

[37]  K. Kleesiek,et al.  High-volume extraction of nucleic acids by magnetic bead technology for ultrasensitive detection of bacteria in blood components. , 2007, Clinical chemistry.

[38]  A. Caliendo,et al.  Viral Infections in Transplant Patients , 2007 .

[39]  A. Caliendo,et al.  Molecular Pathology in Clinical Practice , 2007 .

[40]  Zhou Huawe Evaluation of matrix effects , 2007 .

[41]  James C. Boyd,et al.  Selection and Analytical Evaluations of Methods-With Statistical Techniques , 2006 .

[42]  M. Kroll,et al.  Evaluation of Matrix Effects ; Approved Guideline — Second Edition , 2005 .

[43]  Medicare, Medicaid, and CLIA programs; laboratory requirements relating to quality systems and certain personnel qualifications. Final rule. , 2003, Federal register.

[44]  A. Saah,et al.  Sensitivity and Specificity Reconsidered: The Meaning of These Terms in Analytical and Diagnostic Settings , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[45]  C. Burtis Tietz textbook of Clinical Chemistry , 1994 .

[46]  J. Saldanha Assays for viral sequences and their value in validation of viral elimination. , 1993, Developments in biological standardization.

[47]  H. W. Schultz Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act , 1981 .