Tangible futures: Combining scenario thinking and personas - A pilot study on urban mobility

Abstract Scenario planning methods tend to work at an aggregate level and to consider homogeneous populations, thus levelling the variable effects of future developments on different social groups. Decision-making based on such scenarios bears the risk of missing undesired impacts on specific groups of people, which may cause social tensions or require costly countermeasures. New approaches are needed to provide a better basis for socially responsible planning by making clearer the complex social impacts of future scenarios. In marketing and user-centered design, persona models are developed to represent typologies of users to cover a broad range of needs and requirements. We propose a systematic method, called the Scenario Personarrative method, for combining scenario thinking and personas into a structured but nonetheless flexible process, which allows generating fine-grained individualized narratives. We describe a pilot application in a case study on urban mobility. This pilot used existing scenarios and focused on a two-hour workshop where twelve experts created personas and the associated narratives across three scenarios of urban mobility in 2030. This pilot shows the applicability of the method for making potential effects on different social groups more tangible. We propose ways forward for further evaluation of the proposed methodology.

[1]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  A behavior model for persuasive design , 2009, Persuasive '09.

[2]  Mika Pantzar,et al.  The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and how it Changes , 2012 .

[3]  P. Schoemaker Scenario Planning: A Tool for Strategic Thinking , 1995 .

[4]  R. Pinto,et al.  Reframing technologically enhanced urban scenarios: A design research model towards human centered smart cities , 2019, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[5]  David Banister,et al.  Collaborative backcasting for transport policy scenario building , 2017 .

[6]  Stewart A. Birrell,et al.  Using Passenger Personas to Design Technological Innovation for the Rail Industry , 2017 .

[7]  Philippe Durance,et al.  La prospective stratégique : Pour les entreprises et les territoires , 2008 .

[8]  Thomas J. Chermack,et al.  Scenario Planning in Organizations: How to Create, Use, and Assess Scenarios , 2011 .

[9]  M. Krail,et al.  Transport demand evolution in Europe – factors of change, scenarios and challenges , 2015 .

[10]  Judith Scott Clayton,et al.  The Future , 2001, Nature.

[11]  M. Foster,et al.  Scenario planning for small businesses , 1993 .

[12]  Heiko A. von der Gracht,et al.  Heading towards a multimodal city of the future , 2014 .

[13]  Stefanie Beyer,et al.  Evaluation of Persona-Based User Scenarios in Vehicle Development , 2018, IHSED.

[14]  Joeri Van Mierlo,et al.  Total Cost for Society: A persona-based analysis of electric and conventional vehicles , 2018, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

[15]  Roy C. Schmidt,et al.  MANAGING DELPHI SURVEYS USING NONPARAMETRIC STATISTICAL TECHNIQUES , 1997 .

[16]  Claudio Borean,et al.  Dynamic ride sharing service: are users ready to adopt it? , 2015 .

[17]  René Victor Valqui Vidal,et al.  Using soft OR in a small company--The case of Kirby , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  J. Patz,et al.  Climate Change, Human Rights, and Social Justice. , 2015, Annals of global health.

[19]  Tomasz Miaskiewicz,et al.  Personas and user-centered design: How can personas benefit product design processes? , 2011 .

[20]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Personas: practice and theory , 2003, DUX '03.

[21]  Clare Harries,et al.  Correspondence to what? Coherence to what? What is good scenario-based decision making? , 2003 .

[22]  Fritz Frenkler,et al.  Personas and Emotional Design for Public Service Robots: A Case Study with Autonomous Vehicles in Public Transportation , 2018, 2018 International Conference on Cyberworlds (CW).

[23]  P. John Clarkson,et al.  PERSONAS FOR POLICY-MAKING AND HEALTHCARE DESIGN , 2018 .

[24]  Johanna Zmud,et al.  The Future of Mobility , 2015 .

[25]  Martin Kamprath,et al.  The impact of sectoral changes on individual competences: A reflective scenario-based approach in the creative industries , 2015 .

[26]  Barth Bertram,et al.  Was sind Sinus-Milieus®? , 2012 .

[27]  George Cairns,et al.  Does the intuitive logics method – and its recent enhancements – produce “effective” scenarios? , 2013 .

[28]  Chris Chapman,et al.  The Personas' New Clothes: Methodological and Practical Arguments against a Popular Method , 2006 .

[29]  Emidia Vagnoni,et al.  A multi-level perspective analysis of urban mobility system dynamics: What are the future transition pathways? , 2018 .

[30]  Eric Brangier,et al.  Persona: A Method to Produce Representations Focused on Consumers’ Needs , 2011 .

[31]  Vincent Kaufmann,et al.  From weak signals to mobility scenarios: A prospective study of France in 2050 , 2016 .

[32]  Alan Cooper,et al.  The Inmates are Running the Asylum , 1999, Software-Ergonomie.

[33]  Jane M. Palmer,et al.  Past remarkable: Using life stories to trace alternative futures , 2014 .

[34]  C. Pronello,et al.  Travellers’ profiles definition using statistical multivariate analysis of attitudinal variables , 2011 .

[35]  Laurence Turcksin,et al.  Multi actor multi criteria analysis (MAMCA) as a tool to support sustainable decisions: State of use , 2012, Decis. Support Syst..

[36]  Christopher A. Mattson,et al.  The Personification of Big Data , 2019, Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design.

[37]  Johanna Zmud,et al.  The Future of Mobility: Scenarios for China in 2030 , 2015 .

[38]  Barbara Lenz,et al.  Autonomous Driving - The Impact of Vehicle Automation on Mobility Behaviour , 2016 .

[39]  Johanna Zmud,et al.  Travel in Britain in 2035: future scenarios and their implications for technology innovation , 2016 .

[40]  Susan Turner,et al.  Is stereotyping inevitable when designing with personas , 2011 .

[41]  José L. Abdelnour-Nocera,et al.  A Critique of Personas as representations of "the other" in Cross-Cultural Technology Design , 2016, AfriCHI.

[42]  Alexandra Millonig,et al.  Using Milieu-Based Communication Strategies For Changing Mobility Behaviour Towards Low Energy Modes , 2016 .

[43]  Andreas Reckwitz Toward a Theory of Social Practices , 2002 .

[44]  Gerardo Marletto,et al.  Car and the city: Socio-technical transition pathways to 2030 , 2014 .

[45]  Susan L Handy,et al.  What Affects Millennials’ Mobility? Part I: Investigating the Environmental Concerns, Lifestyles, Mobility-Related Attitudes and Adoption of Technology of Young Adults in California , 2016 .

[46]  Sven Kesselring,et al.  Pioneering Mobilities: New Patterns of Movement and Motility in a Mobile World , 2006 .

[47]  Tom Erik Julsrud,et al.  Technopolis, shared resources or controlled mobility? A net-based Delphi-study to explore visions of future urban daily mobility in Norway , 2015 .

[48]  James C. Wetherbe,et al.  Key issues in information systems management , 1987 .

[49]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Personas, Participatory Design and Product Development: An Infrastructure for Engagement , 2002 .

[50]  M. V. Asselt,et al.  An updated scenario typology , 2003 .

[51]  A. Idil Gaziulusoy,et al.  Using futures inquiry to create low-carbon, resilient urban futures: a review of practice, theory and process options for the Visions and Pathways project , 2016 .

[52]  M. Sandelowski Focus on Research Methods Whatever Happened to Qualitative Description? , 2022 .

[53]  Wendy A Rogers,et al.  Envisioning the Future for Older Adults: Autonomy, Health, Well-being, and Social Connectedness with Technology Support. , 2017, Futures.

[54]  Mimi Sheller,et al.  Mobility Justice: The Politics of Movement in an Age of Extremes , 2018 .

[55]  John S. Pruitt,et al.  The Persona Lifecycle: Keeping People in Mind Throughout Product Design , 2006 .

[56]  Andreas Knie,et al.  Mobility in the age of digital modernity: why the private car is losing its significance, intermodal transport is winning and why digitalisation is the key , 2016 .

[57]  Tim Jackson,et al.  The Post-growth Challenge: Secular Stagnation, Inequality and the Limits to Growth , 2019, Ecological Economics.

[58]  Laurent Dauby,et al.  The Future of Urban Mobility 2.0: Imperatives to Shape Extended Mobility Ecosystems of Tomorrow , 2014 .

[59]  M. Sand On “not having a future” , 2019, Futures.

[60]  George Wright,et al.  Scenario Thinking: Practical Approaches to the Future , 2011 .

[61]  Martin Winter,et al.  Transformation in transportation? , 2014 .

[62]  Inga-Lena Darkow,et al.  Analysis of factors influencing the development of transport infrastructure until the year 2030 — A Delphi based scenario study , 2012 .

[63]  George Wright,et al.  The origins and evolution of scenario techniques in long range business planning , 2005 .

[64]  Alexandra Millonig,et al.  Developing Encouragement Strategies For Active Mobility , 2016 .

[65]  Guillaume Lamé,et al.  Methods and contexts: Challenges of planning with scenarios in a hospital’s division , 2019, Futures.

[66]  Lieven De Marez,et al.  Towards Innovation Foresight: Two empirical case studies on future TV experiences for/by users , 2014 .

[67]  Bella Martin,et al.  Universal Methods of Design: 100 Ways to Research Complex Problems, Develop Innovative Ideas, and Design Effective Solutions , 2012 .