Size, Accumulation and Performance for Research Grants: Examining the Role of Size for Centres of Excellence

The present paper examines the relation between size, accumulation and performance for research grants, where we examine the relation between grant size for Centres of Excellence (CoE) funded by the Danish National Research Foundation (DNRF) and various ex post research performance measures, including impact and shares of highly cited articles. We examine both the relation between size and performance and also how performance for CoEs evolves over the course of grant periods. In terms of dynamics, it appears that performance over the grant period (i.e. 10 years) is falling for the largest CoEs, while it is increasing for those among the smallest half. Overall, multivariate econometric analysis finds evidence that performance is increasing in grant size and over time. In both cases, the relation appears to be non-linear, suggesting that there is a point at which performance peaks. The CoEs have also been very successful in securing additional funding, which can be viewed as a ‘cumulative effect’ of center grants. In terms of new personnel, the far majority of additional funding is spent on early career researchers, hence, this accumulation would appear to have a ‘generational’ dimension, allowing for scientific expertise to be passed on to an increasing number of younger researchers.

[1]  Hairul Azlan Annuar,et al.  Foreign investors' interests and corporate tax avoidance: Evidence from an emerging economy , 2015 .

[2]  J. Hicks,et al.  The economics of science , 1996 .

[3]  Diana Hicks,et al.  Equity and Excellence in Research Funding , 2011 .

[4]  M. Arellano,et al.  Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models , 1995 .

[5]  David J. Currie,et al.  Big Science vs. Little Science: How Scientific Impact Scales with Funding , 2013, PloS one.

[6]  J. Sargan.  THE ESTIMATION OF ECONOMIC RELATIONSHIPS USING INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES , 1958 .

[7]  C. Bloch,et al.  The size of research funding: Trends and implications , 2015 .

[8]  L. Hansen.  Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimators , 1982 .

[9]  Nick von Tunzelmann,et al.  The Effects of Size on Research Performance: A SPRU Review , 2003 .

[10]  Jan Youtie,et al.  Program-level assessment of research centers: Contribution of Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers to US Nanotechnology National Initiative goals , 2012 .

[11]  Joseph C. Hermanowicz.  The Culture of Mediocrity , 2013 .

[12]  Thomas A. DiPrete,et al.  Cumulative Advantage as a Mechanism for Inequality: A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Developments , 2006 .

[13]  Joachim Mathiesen,et al.  Scaling properties of European research units , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Derek de Solla Price,et al.  A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes , 1976, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[15]  Arthur J. Meadows.  Ortega hypothesis , 2005, Scientometrics.

[16]  Jan Youtie,et al.  Bibliographic coupling and network analysis to assess knowledge coalescence in a research center environment , 2013 .

[17]  Dag W. Aksnes,et al.  Scientific Productivity and Group Size: A Bibliometric Analysis of Norwegian Microbiological Research , 2004, Scientometrics.

[18]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  Field-Normalized Citation Impact Indicators and the Choice of an Appropriate Counting Method , 2015, ISSI.

[19]  Naomi Fukuzawa,et al.  Effects of large-scale research funding programs: a Japanese case study , 2013, Scientometrics.

[20]  Dag W. Aksnes,et al.  Ranking national research systems by citation indicators. A comparative analysis using whole and fractionalised counting methods , 2012, J. Informetrics.

[21]  M. Arellano,et al.  Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations , 1991 .

[22]  R. Johnston.  Effects of resource concentration on research performance , 1994 .

[23]  R. Jackson,et al.  The Matthew Effect in Science , 1988, International journal of dermatology.

[24]  David Roodman.  How to do Xtabond2: An Introduction to Difference and System GMM in Stata , 2006 .

[25]  J. S. Long,et al.  Cumulative Advantage and Inequality in Science , 1982 .

[26]  John P. Walsh,et al.  The bureaucratization of science , 2015 .