Rhesus monkeys lack a consistent peak-end effect

In humans, the order of receiving sequential rewards can significantly influence the overall subjective utility of an outcome. For example, people subjectively rate receiving a large reward by itself significantly higher than receiving the same large reward followed by a smaller one (Do, Rupert, & Wolford, 2008). This result is called the peak-end effect. A comparative analysis of order effects can help determine the generality of such effects across primates, and we therefore examined the influence of reward-quality order on decision making in three rhesus macaque monkeys (Macaca mulatta). When given the choice between a high–low reward sequence and a low–high sequence, all three monkeys preferred receiving the high-value reward first. Follow-up experiments showed that for two of the three monkeys their choices depended specifically on reward-quality order and could not be accounted for by delay discounting. These results provide evidence for the influence of outcome order on decision making in rhesus monkeys. Unlike humans, who usually discount choices when a low-value reward comes last, rhesus monkeys show no such peak-end effect.

[1]  H Rachlin,et al.  Commitment, choice and self-control. , 1972, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[2]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Distinction Bias: Misprediction and Mischoice Due to Joint Evaluation , 2004 .

[3]  B. Williams.  Varieties of contrast: a review of incentive relativity by charles f. Flaherty. , 1997, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[4]  D. Rumbaugh,et al.  Delay of gratification in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). , 1999, Developmental psychobiology.

[5]  E. Weber,et al.  Predicting Risk-Sensitivity in Humans and Lower Animals: Risk as Variance or Coefficient of Variation , 2004, Psychological review.

[6]  Paul Rozin,et al.  Experienced and remembered pleasure for meals: Duration neglect but minimal peak, end (recency) or primacy effects , 2007, Appetite.

[7]  B. Hayden,et al.  Gambling for Gatorade: risk-sensitive decision making for fluid rewards in humans , 2008, Animal Cognition.

[8]  A. Logue.  Self-Control: Waiting Until Tomorrow for What You Want Today , 1994 .

[9]  S F Sands,et al.  Monkey memory: same/different concept learning, serial probe acquisition, and probe delay effects. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[10]  John A. List,et al.  Preference Reversals of a Different Kind: The "More Is Less" Phenomenon , 2002 .

[11]  T. Zentall,et al.  Within-trial contrast: pigeons prefer conditioned reinforcers that follow a relatively more rather than a less aversive event. , 2007, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[12]  M. Hauser,et al.  The ecology and evolution of patience in two New World monkeys , 2005, Biology Letters.

[13]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Affective Forecasting , 2005 .

[14]  J. Anderson,et al.  Natural choice in nonhuman primates. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[15]  B. Williams.  Behavioral contrast redux , 2002, Animal learning & behavior.

[16]  Sarah R. Heilbronner,et al.  Cognitive influences on risk-seeking by rhesus macaques. , 2008, Judgment and decision making.

[17]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Memories of colonoscopy: a randomized trial , 2003, Pain.

[18]  M. Beran,et al.  Natural Choice in Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Perceptual and Temporal Effects on Selective Value. , 2009, Learning and motivation.

[19]  R. Cook,et al.  Memory processing of serial lists by pigeons, monkeys, and people. , 1985, Science.

[20]  Dan Padgett,et al.  Patterns of Affective Reactions to Advertisements: The Integration of Moment-to-Moment Responses into Overall Judgments , 1997 .

[21]  Delay of Gratification and Delay Maintenance by Rhesus Macaques (Macaca Mulatta) , 2007, The Journal of general psychology.

[22]  D Kahneman,et al.  Determinants of the remembered utility of aversive sounds. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[23]  R. Hertwig,et al.  Decisions from Experience and the Effect of Rare Events in Risky Choice , 2004, Psychological science.

[24]  G. Wolford,et al.  Evaluations of pleasurable experiences: The peak-end rule , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  G. Ainslie.  Specious reward: a behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. , 1975, Psychological bulletin.

[26]  L. Green,et al.  Discounting of Delayed Rewards: A Life-Span Comparison , 1994 .

[27]  M. Beran.  Maintenance of Self-Imposed Delay of Gratification by Four Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and an Orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus) , 2002, The Journal of general psychology.

[28]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Duration neglect in retrospective evaluations of affective episodes. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  D. Kahneman,et al.  When More Pain Is Preferred to Less: Adding a Better End , 1993 .

[30]  Sarah R. Heilbronner,et al.  A fruit in the hand or two in the bush? Divergent risk preferences in chimpanzees and bonobos , 2008, Biology Letters.

[31]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[32]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Preference Reversals between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Options: A Review and Theoretical Analysis , 1999 .

[33]  Christopher K. Hsee.  Less is Better: When Low-Value Options are Valued More Highly than High-Value Options , 1998 .

[34]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Patients' memories of painful medical treatments: real-time and retrospective evaluations of two minimally invasive procedures , 1996, Pain.

[35]  M. Hauser,et al.  The Evolutionary Origins of Human Patience: Temporal Preferences in Chimpanzees, Bonobos, and Human Adults , 2007, Current Biology.

[36]  Reid Hastie,et al.  Order in Choice , 2009, Psychological science.

[37]  C. A. Castro,et al.  Primacy and recency effects in nonhuman primates. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[38]  C. Flaherty,et al.  Relative hedonic value modulates anticipatory contrast , 1994, Physiology & Behavior.

[39]  Benjamin Y. Hayden,et al.  Temporal Discounting Predicts Risk Sensitivity in Rhesus Macaques , 2007, Current Biology.