The utility of routine clinical 12-lead ECG in assessing eligibility for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator

INTRODUCTION The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) is a life-saving device. Recording of a specialized 3-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is required for S-ICD eligibility assessment. The goals of this study were: (1) evaluate the effect of ECG filtering on S-ICD eligibility, and (2) simplify S-ICD eligibility assessment by development of an S-ICD ineligibility prediction tool, which utilizes the widely available routine 12-lead ECG. METHODS AND RESULTS Prospective cross-sectional study participants [n = 68; 54% male; 94% white, with wide ranges of age (18-81 y), body mass index (19-53), QRS duration (66-150 ms), and left ventricular ejection fraction (37-77%)] underwent 12-lead supine, 3-lead supine and standing ECG recording. All 3-lead ECG recordings were assessed using the standard S-ICD pre-implantation ECG morphology screening. Backward, stepwise, logistic regression was used to build a model for 12-lead prediction of S-ICD eligibility. Select electrocardiogram waves and complexes: QRS, R-, S, and T-amplitudes on all 12 leads, averaged QT interval, QRS duration, and R/T ratio in the lead with the largest T wave (R/Tmax) were included as predictors. The effect of ECG filtering on ECG morphology was evaluated. A total of 9 participants (13%) failed S-ICD screening prior to filtering. Filtering at 3-40 Hz, similar to the S-ICD default, reduced S-ICD ineligibility to 4%. A regression model that included RII, SII-aVL, TI, II, aVL, aVF, V3-V6, and R/Tmax perfectly predicted S-ICD eligibility, with an Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve of 1.0. CONCLUSION Routine clinical 12-lead ECG can be used to predict S-ICD eligibility. ECG filtering may improve S-ICD eligibility.

[1]  Chun Wai Wong,et al.  Efficacy and safety of the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator: a systematic review , 2017, Heart.

[2]  Wojciech Zareba,et al.  Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (MADIT S-ICD): Design and clinical protocol. , 2017, American heart journal.

[3]  A. Sittig,et al.  Reconstruction of the Frank vectorcardiogram from standard electrocardiographic leads: diagnostic comparison of different methods. , 1990, European heart journal.

[4]  Michael R Gold,et al.  Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator Post-Approval Study: Clinical characteristics and perioperative results. , 2017, Heart rhythm.

[5]  Fabrizio Ammirati,et al.  Oversensing of an unexpected atrial flutter. A new tool to improve detection of supraventricular arrhythmias in subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators , 2017, HeartRhythm case reports.

[6]  Joaquín Osca,et al.  Conventional and right‐sided screening for subcutaneous ICD in a population with congenital heart disease at high risk of sudden cardiac death , 2017, Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc.

[7]  Iacopo Olivotto,et al.  Prevalence of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator candidacy based on template ECG screening in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. , 2016, Heart rhythm.

[8]  Theodore C Chan,et al.  Electrocardiographic electrode misplacement, misconnection, and artifact. , 2012, The Journal of emergency medicine.

[9]  Kevin M. Monahan,et al.  Oversensing of atrial fibrillatory waves in a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator , 2017, HeartRhythm case reports.

[10]  Arthur A M Wilde,et al.  Inappropriate shocks in the subcutaneous ICD: Incidence, predictors and management. , 2015, International journal of cardiology.

[11]  A. Wilde,et al.  Which Patients Are Not Suitable for a Subcutaneous ICD: Incidence and Predictors of Failed QRS‐T‐Wave Morphology Screening , 2014, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[12]  Rishi Arora,et al.  Use of an electrocardiographic screening tool to determine candidacy for a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. , 2014, Heart rhythm.

[13]  Pier D Lambiase,et al.  Implant and Midterm Outcomes of the Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Registry: The EFFORTLESS Study. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  Jonathan Weinstock,et al.  Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: An Initial Experience , 2016, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[15]  Marek Malik,et al.  Incorrect electrode cable connection during electrocardiographic recording. , 2007, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[16]  J. Hummel,et al.  T-wave oversensing from postural changes: A rare cause of inappropriate shock from a subcutaneous defibrillator , 2017, HeartRhythm case reports.

[17]  Pier D Lambiase,et al.  Disease Severity and Exercise Testing Reduce Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Left Sternal ECG Screening Success in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy , 2017, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[18]  Nandita Sharma,et al.  Visual transform applications for estimating the spatial QRS-T angle from the conventional 12-lead ECG: Kors is still most Frank. , 2014, Journal of electrocardiology.

[19]  SumChe Man,et al.  Influence of the vectorcardiogram synthesis matrix on the power of the electrocardiogram-derived spatial QRS-T angle to predict arrhythmias in patients with ischemic heart disease and systolic left ventricular dysfunction. , 2011, Journal of electrocardiology.

[20]  Pier D. Lambiase,et al.  Safety and Efficacy of the Totally Subcutaneous Implantable Defibrillator: 2-Year Results From a Pooled Analysis of the IDE Study and EFFORTLESS Registry. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.