CreaSTEAM. Towards the improvement of diversity gaps through the compilation of projects, best practices and STEAM-Lab spaces

Lack of diversity, especially gender inequality and social background are some global problems in different sectors but especially latent in the context of the fields of Science, Technology, Engineering (and the recently added concept of Arts), and Mathematics (STEAM), from primary school to university level and, therefore, labor market. When we talk about diversity, we are worried about attracting representative people from all sectors of society, different cultures, disabilities, ethnic groups, gender or sexual orientation. Besides, the low diversity in STEAM studies has been identified as one of the main problems that needs to be solved in order to reduce the diversity gap that exists in these sectors. The CreaSTEAM project addresses this, not only from the gender gap perspective, but also with a broad approach covering diversity and social inclusion as a way to create inclusive spaces in which to promote STEAM. The project aims to provide an actualized map of the resources focused on the reduction of the diversity gap using STEAM approaches and to select from these resources better solutions to create a framework to implement STEAM-Labs into secondary schools. The STEAM-Labs, as a main innovation of the project, merge the solutions that we can find in FAB-Labs, MEDIA-Labs, and USER-Labs. Our approach is focused on the creation of good practices in these spaces in order to promote diversity in STEAM, where diversity also covers gender equity, and social inclusion for promotion of STEAM vocations.

[1]  Lisa Tsui,et al.  Effective Strategies to Increase Diversity in STEM Fields: A Review of the Research Literature , 2007 .

[2]  Ming-Te Wang,et al.  Gender Gap in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM): Current Knowledge, Implications for Practice, Policy, and Future Directions , 2017, Educational psychology review.

[3]  Francisco J. García-Peñalvo,et al.  Trends in studies developed in Europe focused on the gender gap in STEM , 2019, Interacción.

[4]  Silvia Rueda,et al.  Gender Diversity in STEM Disciplines: A Multiple Factor Problem , 2019, Entropy.

[5]  Douglas L. Medin,et al.  Cultural processes in science education: Supporting the navigation of multiple epistemologies , 2010 .

[6]  Sergi Fàbregues,et al.  Parent and Teacher Depictions of Gender Gaps in Secondary Student Appraisals of Their Academic Competences , 2020, Frontiers in Psychology.

[7]  D. Fonseca,et al.  Systematic Review of How Engineering Schools around the World Are Deploying the 2030 Agenda , 2020, Sustainability.

[8]  E. Sebastián‐González,et al.  Unravelling the gender productivity gap in science: a meta-analytical review , 2019, Royal Society Open Science.

[9]  Mei-Hung Chiu,et al.  The Gender Gap in Science , 2018, Chemistry International.

[10]  Miguel Ángel Conde González,et al.  Fostering STEAM through challenge‐based learning, robotics, and physical devices: A systematic mapping literature review , 2020, Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ..

[11]  Deborah Trumbull Contextual assessment in science education: Background, issues, and policy , 2006 .

[12]  Hsieh Tzu-Ling Gender differences in high-school learning experiences, motivation, self-efficacy, and career aspirations among Taiwanese STEM college students , 2019, International Journal of Science Education.

[13]  F. García-Peñalvo,et al.  La brecha de género en el sector STEM en América Latina: una propuesta europea , 2019, Aprendizaje, Innovación y Cooperación como impulsores del cambio metodológico.

[14]  Eva Villegas,et al.  Design Thinking and Gamification: User Centered Methodologies , 2019, HCI.

[15]  I. Iriondo,et al.  Project Based Learning or the Rethinking of an Engineering Subject: Measuring Motivation , 2020, TEEM.

[16]  Maria João Ferreira,et al.  ECLECTIC as a learning ecosystem for higher education disruption , 2019, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[17]  David Fonseca,et al.  Methodologies of Learning Served by Virtual Reality: A Case Study in Urban Interventions , 2019, Applied Sciences.

[18]  Josechu J. Guerrero,et al.  Active learning in robotics based on simulation tools , 2014, Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ..

[19]  Francisco J. García-Peñalvo,et al.  Gender equality in STEM programs: a proposal to analyse the situation of a university about the gender gap , 2020, 2020 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON).

[20]  Francisco José García-Peñalvo,et al.  Interactive and collaborative technological ecosystems for improving academic motivation and engagement , 2019, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[21]  Francisco José García Peñalvo,et al.  Innovative teaching methods in engineering: guest editorial , 2015 .

[22]  Francisco J. García-Peñalvo,et al.  European Proposals to Work in the Gender Gap in STEM: A Systematic Analysis , 2020, IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje.

[23]  Francisco J. García-Peñalvo,et al.  Engaging women into STEM in Latin America: W-STEM project , 2019, TEEM.

[24]  M. Winters From Diversity to Inclusion: An Inclusion Equation , 2014 .

[25]  Francisco J. García-Peñalvo,et al.  Improving the information society skills: Is knowledge accessible for all? , 2017, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[26]  Walter C. Lee,et al.  Measuring underrepresented student perceptions of inclusion within engineering departments and universities , 2014 .

[27]  M. Mattis,et al.  Women and minorities in science, technology, engineering and mathematics : upping the numbers , 2007 .