Teaching and learning with a visualiser in the primary classroom: modelling graph‐making

This paper examines the technological affordances of the visualiser, and what teachers actually do with it in the primary (elementary) classroom, followed by an investigation into one example of teaching and learning with this whole‐class technology. A visualiser is a digital display device. Connected to a data projector, whatever is in view of the camera is magnified in real time on the screen – be it a page from a book, an object, a living thing, or actions on and gestures around it. Used as a site for interaction with the class, a site for observation, a site for information, a site for modelling, a site for guided investigation and a site for assessment, scale directs attention to the screen display, whilst disconnection of the user’s body compels students to make decisions about where to look when. Modelling (or demonstration) is a common pedagogic practice. Showing a class of 9‐ and 10‐year‐olds how to transform numerical values into a bar graph on the visualiser entailed multimodal ensembles of inscription, gesture and speech. Students’ subsequent production of bar graphs was framed by imperatives and choices, to which they responded agentively. The ways in which teachers use the visualiser in their classroom practices has implications for mediation and communication in the classroom, and hence for pedagogy and learning.

[1]  Carey Jewitt,et al.  Interactive Whiteboards, Pedagogy, and Pupil Performance: An Evaluation of the Schools Whiteboard Expansion Project (London Challenge) , 2007 .

[2]  G. Kress,et al.  English in Urban Classrooms: A Multimodal Perspective on Teaching and Learning , 2004 .

[3]  M. Studdert-Kennedy Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal About Thought. , 1994 .

[4]  David Miller,et al.  The Interactive Whiteboard as a Force for Pedagogic Change: The Experience of Five Elementary Schools in an English Education Authority , 2002 .

[5]  B. Somekh,et al.  Evaluation of the Primary Schools Whiteboard Expansion Project , 2007 .

[6]  Theo van Leeuwen,et al.  Introducing social semiotics , 2005 .

[7]  Gunther Kress,et al.  Literacy in the New Media Age , 2003 .

[8]  Gary Beauchamp,et al.  Analysing the use of interactive technology to implement interactive teaching , 2007, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[9]  Juanita K. Hewitt Interactive Whiteboards in the classroom , 2010 .

[10]  P. Ekman,et al.  The Repertoire of Nonverbal Behavior: Categories, Origins, Usage, and Coding , 1969 .

[11]  Denis Newman,et al.  Telling what they know: The role of gesture and language in children's science explanations , 1993 .

[12]  S. Goldin-Meadow,et al.  The mismatch between gesture and speech as an index of transitional knowledge , 1986, Cognition.

[13]  S. Hennessy,et al.  Pedagogical strategies for using the interactive whiteboard to foster learner participation in school science , 2007 .

[14]  J. Stigler,et al.  The Teaching Gap: Best Ideas from the World's Teachers for Improving Education in the Classroom , 1999 .

[15]  S. Higgins,et al.  The Impact of Interactive Whiteboards on Teacher--Pupil Interaction in the National Literacy and Numeracy Strategies. , 2006 .

[16]  F. Erickson,et al.  The counselor as gatekeeper : social interaction in interviews , 1982 .

[17]  Norbert Freedman,et al.  Evocation of two types of hand movements in information processing. , 1978 .