Imaging through the atmosphere: practical instrumentation-based theory and verification of aerosol modulation transfer function: reply to comment

New exact numerical calculations as well as exact calculations in J. Opt. Soc. Am. A10, 172 ( 1993) indicate that the approximations in the Comment in J. Opt. Soc. Am. A11, 1175 ( 1994) are based on faulty perceptions of basic scattering phenomena and on a misreading of our paper. The Comment does not sufficiently consider effects of instrumentation. Whereas our model refers to the aerosol modulation transfer function (MTF) in the image plane, the values of maximum angles for scattered (θS) and unscattered (θ0) light used in the Comment refer to the optics plane. The Comment does not consider the fact that dynamic range limits (θS) in the image, whereas limited spatial-frequency bandwidth broadens θ0 in the image, each by orders of magnitude. Therefore the Comment’s conclusion contradicts experimental results obtained by numerous researchers. The Comment’s conclusion that aerosol MTF is insignificant is based on that author’s own experiments, in which clear weather and haze atmospheric MTF (composed of turbulence and aerosol MTF’s) could not be measured, the reason being insufficient equipment resolution, rather than insignificant turbulence or aerosol MTF. Furthermore, the claim in our original paper that aerosol MTF is extremely significant has since been supported by many different types of experiments that included short and long exposures, thermal imaging, and image restoration based on atmospheric MTF, including a highly significant practical, uniquely shaped, aerosol MTF.

[1]  Giovanni Zaccanti,et al.  Comparison between measured and calculated contributions of multiply scattered radiation to the transmittance of a light beam through a turbid medium , 1987 .

[2]  Norman S. Kopeika,et al.  Spatial-frequency- and wavelength-dependent effects of aerosols on the atmospheric modulation transfer function , 1982 .

[3]  Piero Bruscaglioni,et al.  A Numerical Procedure for Calculating the Effect of a Turbid Medium on the MTF of an Optical System , 1991 .

[4]  Akira Ishimaru,et al.  Modulation transfer function and image transmission through randomly distributed spherical particles , 1985, Annual Meeting Optical Society of America.

[5]  Richard F. Lutomirski,et al.  Atmospheric Degradation Of Electro-Optical System Performance , 1978, Other Conferences.

[6]  Norman S. Kopeika,et al.  Comparison between high-resolution restoration techniques of atmospherically distorted images , 1995 .

[7]  L. Bissonnette.  Imaging through the atmosphere: practical instrumentation-based theory and verification of aerosol modulation transfer function: comment , 1994 .

[8]  Theoretical and experimental investigation of image quality through an inhomogeneous turbulent medium , 1994 .

[9]  A Zardecki,et al.  Multiple scattering effects in spatial frequency filtering. , 1984, Applied Optics.

[10]  I. Dror,et al.  Experimental comparison of turbulence modulation transfer function and aerosol modulation transfer function through the open atmosphere , 1995 .

[11]  Norman S. Kopeika,et al.  Thermal imaging through the atmosphere : atmospheric modulation transfer function theory and verification , 1994 .

[12]  D Sadot,et al.  Effects of absorption on image quality through a particulate medium. , 1994, Applied optics.

[13]  Andrew Zardecki,et al.  Image-quality degradation in a turbid medium under partially coherent illumination , 1986 .

[14]  Norman S. Kopeika,et al.  Imaging through the atmosphere: practical instrumentation-based theory and verification of aerosol modulation transfer function , 1993 .

[15]  R. Lutomirski,et al.  Atmospheric Degradation Of Electro-Optical System Performance , 1978, Other Conferences.

[16]  N. Kopeika,et al.  Wavelength variation of visible and near-infrared resolution through the atmosphere: dependence on aerosol and meteorological conditions. , 1981 .

[17]  N S Kopeika,et al.  Aerosol and turbulence modulation transfer functions: comparison measurements in the open atmosphere. , 1992, Optics letters.

[18]  Norman S. Kopeika,et al.  Restoration of thermal images distorted by the atmosphere, based on measured and theoretical atmospheric modulation transfer function , 1994 .

[19]  Piero Bruscaglioni,et al.  Experimental validation of a Monte Carlo procedure for the evaluation of the effect of a turbid medium on the point spread function of an optical system , 1991 .

[20]  Luc R. Bissonnette,et al.  Imaging through fog and rain , 1992 .

[21]  Norman S. Kopeika,et al.  Effects of aerosol forward scatter on the long- and short-exposure atmospheric coherence diameter , 1994 .

[22]  D. Fried.  Optical Resolution Through a Randomly Inhomogeneous Medium for Very Long and Very Short Exposures , 1966 .

[23]  A Ishimaru,et al.  Limitation on image resolution imposed by a random medium. , 1978, Applied optics.

[24]  H. Yura,et al.  Small-angle scattering of light by ocean water. , 1971, Applied optics.

[25]  Norman S. Kopeika,et al.  Restoration of thermal images distorted by the atmosphere, using predicted atmospheric modulation transfer function , 1995 .