A Phenomenological Model of the Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve Fiber: Temporal and Biphasic Response Properties

We present a phenomenological model of electrically stimulated auditory nerve fibers (ANFs). The model reproduces the probabilistic and temporal properties of the ANF response to both monophasic and biphasic stimuli, in isolation. The main contribution of the model lies in its ability to reproduce statistics of the ANF response (mean latency, jitter, and firing probability) under both monophasic and cathodic-anodic biphasic stimulation, without changing the model's parameters. The response statistics of the model depend on stimulus level and duration of the stimulating pulse, reproducing trends observed in the ANF. In the case of biphasic stimulation, the model reproduces the effects of pseudomonophasic pulse shapes and also the dependence on the interphase gap (IPG) of the stimulus pulse, an effect that is quantitatively reproduced. The model is fitted to ANF data using a procedure that uniquely determines each model parameter. It is thus possible to rapidly parameterize a large population of neurons to reproduce a given set of response statistic distributions. Our work extends the stochastic leaky integrate and fire (SLIF) neuron, a well-studied phenomenological model of the electrically stimulated neuron. We extend the SLIF neuron so as to produce a realistic latency distribution by delaying the moment of spiking. During this delay, spiking may be abolished by anodic current. By this means, the probability of the model neuron responding to a stimulus is reduced when a trailing phase of opposite polarity is introduced. By introducing a minimum wait period that must elapse before a spike may be emitted, the model is able to reproduce the differences in the threshold level observed in the ANF for monophasic and biphasic stimuli. Thus, the ANF response to a large variety of pulse shapes are reproduced correctly by this model.

[1]  J. Rothman,et al.  The roles potassium currents play in regulating the electrical activity of ventral cochlear nucleus neurons. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  James D. Weiland,et al.  Interphase gap decreases electrical stimulation threshold of retinal ganglion cells , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[3]  I. Tasaki,et al.  INITIATION AND ABOLITION OF THE ACTION POTENTIAL OF A SINGLE NODE OF RANVIER , 1956, The Journal of general physiology.

[4]  R. Carlyon,et al.  Polarity effects on place pitch and loudness for three cochlear-implant designs and at different cochlear sites. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Lawrence T. Cohen.  Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 5. Refractory recovery and facilitation , 2009, Hearing Research.

[6]  J. Wouters,et al.  Asymmetric Pulses in Cochlear Implants: Effects of Pulse Shape, Polarity, and Rate , 2006, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[7]  David Allingham,et al.  THE APPLICATION OF SUPRATHRESHOLD STOCHASTIC RESONANCE TO COCHLEAR IMPLANT CODING , 2002, The Random and Fluctuating World.

[8]  James B Fallon,et al.  Examining the auditory nerve fiber response to high rate cochlear implant stimulation: chronic sensorineural hearing loss and facilitation. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  J. Mortimer,et al.  The Effect of Stimulus Parameters on the Recruitment Characteristics of Direct Nerve Stimulation , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  M. White,et al.  A stochastic model of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve: single-pulse response , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Jay T. Rubinstein,et al.  Stochastic Population Model for Electrical Stimulation of the Auditory Nerve , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  Mark S Humayun,et al.  Interphase gap as a means to reduce electrical stimulation thresholds for epiretinal prostheses , 2014, Journal of neural engineering.

[13]  William M. Rabinowitz,et al.  Better speech recognition with cochlear implants , 1991, Nature.

[14]  Andrew A. Marino,et al.  ELECTRICAL STIMULATION OF , 2005 .

[15]  Wulfram Gerstner,et al.  SPIKING NEURON MODELS Single Neurons , Populations , Plasticity , 2002 .

[16]  Scott Budd Chapman Dynes.  Discharge characteristics of auditory nerve fibers for pulsatile electrical stimuli , 1996 .

[17]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Speech recognition with varying numbers and types of competing talkers by normal-hearing, cochlear-implant, and implant simulation subjects. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Risto J. Ilmoniemi,et al.  The Effect of Stimulus Parameters on TMS–EEG Muscle Artifacts , 2013, Brain Stimulation.

[19]  J. Thomas Mortimer,et al.  The response of the myelinated nerve fiber to short duration biphasic stimulating currents , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  R. Shepherd,et al.  Electrical Stimulation of the Auditory Nerve: Single Neuron Strength-Duration Functions in Deafened Animals , 2001, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  L. Abbott,et al.  Model neurons: From Hodgkin-Huxley to hopfield , 1990 .

[22]  E. Javel,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: II. Effect of stimulus waveshape on single fibre response properties , 1999, Hearing Research.

[23]  Lawrence T. Cohen,et al.  Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 4. Model development at low pulse rates: General model and application to individuals , 2009, Hearing Research.

[24]  A. A. Verveen,et al.  Fluctuations in membrane potential of axons and the problem of coding , 1965, Kybernetik.

[25]  Paul J. Abbas,et al.  The Dependence of Auditory Nerve Rate Adaptation on Electric Stimulus Parameters, Electrode Position, and Fiber Diameter: A Computer Model Study , 2010, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[26]  Blake S. Wilson,et al.  Cochlear implants: A remarkable past and a brilliant future , 2008, Hearing Research.

[27]  A. Hill.  Excitation and Accommodation in Nerve , 1936 .

[28]  Eugene M. Izhikevich,et al.  Simple model of spiking neurons , 2003, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[29]  Eric Shea-Brown,et al.  A point process framework for modeling electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  Ronald J. MacGregor,et al.  Neural and brain modeling , 1987 .

[31]  Stefan Kerber,et al.  Sound Localization in Noise by Normal-Hearing Listeners and Cochlear Implant Users , 2012, Ear and hearing.

[32]  Christian Hauptmann,et al.  Modified Pulse Shapes for Effective Neural Stimulation , 2011, Front. Neuroeng..

[33]  Lawrence T. Cohen,et al.  Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 2. Spread of the effective stimulation field (ESF), from ECAP and FEA , 2009, Hearing Research.

[34]  Charles A. Miller,et al.  Auditory nerve responses to monophasic and biphasic electric stimuli , 2001, Hearing Research.

[35]  Lawrence T. Cohen,et al.  Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 3. ECAP during bursts and loudness as function of burst duration , 2009, Hearing Research.

[36]  Jan Wouters,et al.  Effect of inter-phase gap on the sensitivity of cochlear implant users to electrical stimulation , 2005, Hearing Research.

[37]  Robert K. Shepherd,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve III. Response initiation sites and temporal fine structure , 2000, Hearing Research.

[38]  F. Rattay.  Analysis of Models for External Stimulation of Axons , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[39]  Jonathan Laudanski,et al.  Mode-locked spike trains in responses of ventral cochlear nucleus chopper and onset neurons to periodic stimuli. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[40]  Jan Wouters,et al.  Alternative pulse shapes in electrical hearing , 2008, Hearing Research.

[41]  J T Rubinstein,et al.  Threshold fluctuations in an N sodium channel model of the node of Ranvier. , 1995, Biophysical journal.

[42]  Yuan-Ting Zhang,et al.  An integrate-and-fire-based auditory nerve model and its response to high-rate pulse train , 2007, Neurocomputing.

[43]  Charles C. Finley,et al.  Evaluation of a model of the cochlear neural membrane. I. Physiological measurement of membrane characteristics in response to intrameatal electrical stimulation , 2000, Hearing Research.

[44]  P. Stypulkowski,et al.  Physiological properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. II. Single fiber recordings , 1984, Hearing Research.

[45]  W. Gerstner,et al.  Time structure of the activity in neural network models. , 1995, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[46]  J. B. Ranck,et al.  Which elements are excited in electrical stimulation of mammalian central nervous system: A review , 1975, Brain Research.

[47]  Frank Rattay,et al.  A model of the electrically excited human cochlear neuron I. Contribution of neural substructures to the generation and propagation of spikes , 2001, Hearing Research.

[48]  Jan Wouters,et al.  A Dual-Process Integrator–Resonator Model of the Electrically Stimulated Human Auditory Nerve , 2007, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[49]  Lawrence T. Cohen,et al.  Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 1. Growth of loudness and ECAP amplitude with current , 2009, Hearing Research.

[50]  Volker Hohmann,et al.  Factors affecting predicted speech intelligibility with cochlear implants in an auditory model for electrical stimulation , 2012, Hearing Research.

[52]  Doug Dean,et al.  Optimization of Neural Stimuli Based Upon a Variable Threshold Potential , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[53]  L. Cartee,et al.  Evaluation of a model of the cochlear neural membrane. II: Comparison of model and physiological measures of membrane properties measured in response to intrameatal electrical stimulation , 2000, Hearing Research.