Improvements and Future Challenges in the Field of Genetically Sensitive Sample Designs

Understanding the sources of individual differences beyond social and economic effects has become a research area of growing interest in psychology, sociology, and economics. A quantitative genetic research design provides the necessary tools for this type of analysis. For a state-of-the-art approach, multigroup data is required. Household panel studies, such as BHPS (Understanding Society) in the UK or the SOEP in Germany, combined with an oversampling of twins, provide a powerful starting point since data from a reasonably large number of non-twin relatives is readily available. In addition to advances in our understanding of genetic and environmental influences on key variables in the social sciences, quantitative genetic analyses of target variables can guide molecular genetic research in the field of employment, earnings, health and satisfaction, as combined twin and sibling or parent data can help overcome serious caveats in molecular genetic research.

[1]  N. Martin,et al.  The Genetics of Voting: An Australian Twin Study , 2007, Behavior genetics.

[2]  David H. Autor,et al.  Changes in the Wage Structure and Earnings Inequality , 1999 .

[3]  A. Jensen,et al.  The g factor , 1996, Nature.

[4]  F. Spinath,et al.  CoSMoS and TwinPaW: initial report on two new German twin studies. , 2006, Twin research and human genetics : the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies.

[5]  L. Friberg,et al.  A new Swedish twin registry containing environmental and medical base line data from about 14,000 same-sexed pairs born 1926-58. , 1976, Acta medica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[6]  Martin Diewald,et al.  Zwillings- und Adoptivkinder-Stichproben für soziologische Analysen? Zum Ertrag verhaltensgenetischer Ansätze für sozialwissenschaftliche Fragestellungen und Erklärungen , 2008 .

[7]  Gary Solon,et al.  Influences of nature and nurture on earnings variation: A report on a study of various sibling types in Sweden , 2009 .

[8]  L. Peltonen,et al.  Classical twin studies and beyond , 2002, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[9]  James H. Fowler,et al.  Two Genes Predict Voter Turnout , 2008, The Journal of Politics.

[10]  N L Segal,et al.  “Sources of Human Psychological Differences: The Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart” (1990), by , 2018 .

[11]  Linda A Corey,et al.  The role of the children of twins design in elucidating causal relations between parent characteristics and child outcomes. , 2003, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[12]  Guang Guo,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue on Society and Genetics , 2008 .

[13]  D. Boomsma,et al.  Twin registers in Europe: an overview , 1998, Twin Research.

[14]  P. Borkenau,et al.  German Observational Study of Adult Twins (GOSAT): a multimodal investigation of personality, temperament and cognitive ability. , 2002, Twin research : the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies.

[15]  Chueh Chang,et al.  Diagnosis of Zygosity by Questionnaire and Polymarker Polymerase Chain Reaction in Young Twins , 1999, Behavior genetics.

[16]  G. Mcclearn,et al.  Effects of early rearing environment on twin similarity in the last half of the life span , 1992 .

[17]  A. Jensen,et al.  Genetics and experience: The interplay between nature and nurture , 1996 .

[18]  M. Keller,et al.  Estimating the Extent of Parameter Bias in the Classical Twin Design: A Comparison of Parameter Estimates From Extended Twin-Family and Classical Twin Designs , 2005, Twin Research and Human Genetics.