Super-resolution imaging reveals distinct chromatin folding for different epigenetic states

Metazoan genomes are spatially organized at multiple scales, from packaging of DNA around individual nucleosomes to segregation of whole chromosomes into distinct territories. At the intermediate scale of kilobases to megabases, which encompasses the sizes of genes, gene clusters and regulatory domains, the three-dimensional (3D) organization of DNA is implicated in multiple gene regulatory mechanisms, but understanding this organization remains a challenge. At this scale, the genome is partitioned into domains of different epigenetic states that are essential for regulating gene expression. Here we investigate the 3D organization of chromatin in different epigenetic states using super-resolution imaging. We classified genomic domains in Drosophila cells into transcriptionally active, inactive or Polycomb-repressed states, and observed distinct chromatin organizations for each state. All three types of chromatin domains exhibit power-law scaling between their physical sizes in 3D and their domain lengths, but each type has a distinct scaling exponent. Polycomb-repressed domains show the densest packing and most intriguing chromatin folding behaviour, in which chromatin packing density increases with domain length. Distinct from the self-similar organization displayed by transcriptionally active and inactive chromatin, the Polycomb-repressed domains are characterized by a high degree of chromatin intermixing within the domain. Moreover, compared to inactive domains, Polycomb-repressed domains spatially exclude neighbouring active chromatin to a much stronger degree. Computational modelling and knockdown experiments suggest that reversible chromatin interactions mediated by Polycomb-group proteins play an important role in these unique packaging properties of the repressed chromatin. Taken together, our super-resolution images reveal distinct chromatin packaging for different epigenetic states at the kilobase-to-megabase scale, a length scale that is directly relevant to genome regulation.

[1]  L. Mirny.  The fractal globule as a model of chromatin architecture in the cell , 2011, Chromosome Research.

[2]  R. Paro,et al.  Transcriptional silencing by polycomb-group proteins. , 2014, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[3]  V. Corces,et al.  Architectural proteins: regulators of 3D genome organization in cell fate. , 2014, Trends in cell biology.

[4]  Bas van Steensel,et al.  Genome Architecture: Domain Organization of Interphase Chromosomes , 2013, Cell.

[5]  Wendy A Bickmore,et al.  The spatial organization of the human genome. , 2013, Annual review of genomics and human genetics.

[6]  I. Amit,et al.  Comprehensive mapping of long range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome , 2011 .

[7]  E. Furlong,et al.  Transcription factors: from enhancer binding to developmental control , 2012, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[8]  Mark Bates,et al.  Three-Dimensional Super-Resolution Imaging by Stochastic Optical Reconstruction Microscopy , 2008, Science.

[9]  T. Cremer,et al.  Chromosome territories. , 2010, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[10]  Giacomo Cavalli,et al.  Polycomb silencing: from linear chromatin domains to 3D chromosome folding. , 2014, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[11]  Peng Yin,et al.  Single-molecule super-resolution imaging of chromosomes and in situ haplotype visualization using Oligopaint FISH probes , 2015, Nature Communications.

[12]  A. Tanay,et al.  Three-Dimensional Folding and Functional Organization Principles of the Drosophila Genome , 2012, Cell.

[13]  B. Ren,et al.  Mapping Human Epigenomes , 2013, Cell.

[14]  Matthew J. Rodesch,et al.  Fluorescence in situ hybridization with high-complexity repeat-free oligonucleotide probes generated by massively parallel synthesis , 2011, Chromosome Research.

[15]  X. Zhuang,et al.  Spatially resolved, highly multiplexed RNA profiling in single cells , 2015, Science.

[16]  Giacomo Cavalli,et al.  The Role of Chromosome Domains in Shaping the Functional Genome , 2015, Cell.

[17]  Robert E. Kingston,et al.  Occupying chromatin: Polycomb mechanisms for getting to genomic targets, stopping transcriptional traffic, and staying put. , 2013, Molecular cell.

[18]  Mario Nicodemi,et al.  Models of chromosome structure. , 2014, Current opinion in cell biology.

[19]  Kurt Kremer,et al.  From a melt of rings to chromosome territories: the role of topological constraints in genome folding , 2013, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.

[20]  B. Bernstein,et al.  SAM domain polymerization links subnuclear clustering of PRC1 to gene silencing. , 2013, Developmental cell.

[21]  B. Ren,et al.  The 3D genome in transcriptional regulation and pluripotency. , 2014, Cell stem cell.

[22]  Michael J Rust,et al.  Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM) , 2006, Nature Methods.

[23]  R. Kornberg,et al.  Twenty-Five Years of the Nucleosome, Fundamental Particle of the Eukaryote Chromosome , 1999, Cell.

[24]  Robert Tjian,et al.  Looping Back to Leap Forward: Transcription Enters a New Era , 2014, Cell.

[25]  Guillaume J. Filion,et al.  Systematic Protein Location Mapping Reveals Five Principal Chromatin Types in Drosophila Cells , 2010, Cell.

[26]  A. Tsalenko,et al.  Visualization of Fine-Scale Genomic Structure by Oligonucleotide-Based High-Resolution FISH , 2010, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.

[27]  E. Lander,et al.  The Mammalian Epigenome , 2007, Cell.

[28]  Jean-Marie Rouillard,et al.  Versatile design and synthesis platform for visualizing genomes with Oligopaint FISH probes , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  E. Heard,et al.  X-chromosome inactivation: new insights into cis and trans regulation. , 2015, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[30]  J. Dekker,et al.  The hierarchy of the 3D genome. , 2013, Molecular cell.