Impact of post-intervention minimal stent area on 9-month follow-up patency of paclitaxel-eluting stents: an integrated intravascular ultrasound analysis from the TAXUS IV, V, and VI and TAXUS ATLAS Workhorse, Long Lesion, and Direct Stent Trials.

OBJECTIVES We investigated the predictive value of the intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) measured post-intervention minimum stent area (MSA) on 9-month follow-up paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) patency compared with bare-metal stents (BMS). BACKGROUND Stent underexpansion is a strong predictor for restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation, but the implication of underexpansion in PES is still unknown. METHODS From the combined TAXUS IV, V, and VI and TAXUS ATLAS Workhorse, Long Lesion, and Direct Stent trials, 1,580 patients (PES 1,098, BMS 482) in IVUS substudies were analyzed. The MSA that best predicted angiographic in-stent restenosis (ISR) (% diameter stenosis > or =50%) was determined. RESULTS The post-intervention IVUS MSA was similar in PES and BMS (6.6 +/- 2.5 mm(2) vs. 6.7 +/- 2.3 mm(2), p = 0.92). At 9-month follow-up, ISR was lower in the PES group versus the BMS group (10% vs. 31%, p < 0.0001). Using multivariable logistic regression analysis, post-intervention IVUS MSA was the independent predictor of subsequent ISR in both the PES and BMS groups (p = 0.0002 for PES and p = 0.0002 for BMS). The ability of the post-intervention IVUS MSA to predict ISR was further assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis. The post-intervention IVUS MSA was found to be a faithful discriminator between patients with and without ISR in both PES (c = 0.6382) and BMS (c = 0.6373). Finally, the optimal thresholds of post-intervention IVUS MSA that best predicted stent patency at 9 months were 5.7 mm(2) for PES and 6.4 mm(2) for BMS. CONCLUSIONS Post-intervention MSA measured by IVUS can predict 9-month follow-up stent patency after both PES and BMS implantation. (Randomized Trial Evaluating Slow-Release Formulation TAXUS Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stents to Treat De Novo Coronary Lesions; NCT00301522) (Direct Stenting of TAXUS Liberté-SR Stent for the Treatment of Patients With de Novo Coronary Artery Lesions; NCT00371423) (A Study of the TAXUS Liberté Stent for the Treatment of Long De Novo Coronary Artery Lesions; NCT00371475) (A Study of the TAXUS Liberté Stent for the Treatment of de Novo Coronary Artery Lesions in Small Vessels; NCT00371748).

[1]  D. Baim,et al.  Polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS Liberté stent in de novo lesions: the pivotal TAXUS ATLAS trial. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  N. Weissman,et al.  The contribution of "mechanical" problems to in-stent restenosis: An intravascular ultrasonographic analysis of 1090 consecutive in-stent restenosis lesions. , 2001, American heart journal.

[3]  Stéphane G Carlier,et al.  Intravascular ultrasound assessment of drug-eluting stent expansion. , 2007, American heart journal.

[4]  T. Ismail,et al.  Restenosis and stent fracture following sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation. , 2007, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[5]  Gregg W Stone,et al.  A polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  P. Fitzgerald,et al.  Impact of final stent dimensions on long-term results following sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: serial intravascular ultrasound analysis from the sirius trial. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  Gregg W Stone,et al.  Comparison of a polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent with a bare metal stent in patients with complex coronary artery disease: a randomized controlled trial. , 2005, JAMA.

[8]  J. Veselka,et al.  “Head‐to‐head comparison between sirolimus‐eluting and paclitaxel‐eluting stents in patients with complex coronary artery disease: An intravascular ultrasound study” , 2006, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[9]  M. De Carlo,et al.  Randomized comparison of sirolimus and paclitaxel drug-eluting stents for long lesions in the left anterior descending artery: an intravascular ultrasound study. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  G. Stone,et al.  Effect of the polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS Express stent on vascular tissue responses: a volumetric intravascular ultrasound integrated analysis from the TAXUS IV, V, and VI trials. , 2007, European heart journal.

[11]  P. Fitzgerald,et al.  An optimal diagnostic threshold for minimal stent area to predict target lesion revascularization following stent implantation in native coronary lesions. , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.

[12]  J. Popma,et al.  Clinical Efficacy of Polymer-Based Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in the Treatment of Complex, Long Coronary Artery Lesions From a Multicenter, Randomized Trial: Support for the Use of Drug-Eluting Stents in Contemporary Clinical Practice , 2005, Circulation.

[13]  Young-Hak Kim,et al.  Intravascular ultrasound predictors of angiographic restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. , 2006, European heart journal.

[14]  N. Weissman,et al.  Direct stenting with the TAXUS Liberté drug-eluting stent: results from the Taxus Atlas Direct Stent Study. , 2008, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[15]  Jeffrey W Moses,et al.  Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  Gregg W. Stone,et al.  A polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease , 2004 .