Nomogram to predict the risk of endoscopic removal failure with forceps/baskets for treating submandibular stones

BACKGROUND Endoscopic removal with forceps/baskets is favored in treating submandibular stones due to its minimal invasiveness. However, recent studies have found that endoscopic removal failure (ERF) is not unusual, and stones in such cases still need to be removed with other surgical methods. If the risk of ERF can be predicted preoperatively, it could be helpful for surgeons when choosing the appropriate therapy. AIM To develop a predictive nomogram for the risk of ERF when treating submandibular stones based on their preoperative clinical features. METHODS A total of 180 patients with 211 submandibular stones treated from January 2012 to December 2020 were included in the current study. Based on the preoperative clinical features of the stones, independent risk factors for ERF were identified by logistic regression analysis. The stones were then randomly divided into training and testing sets. A nomogram was constructed to predict the risk of ERF using the training set and then validated using both sets. The predictive performance of the nomogram was assessed by calibration curves and the concordance index (C-index). RESULTS Three independent predictors, location (P = 0.040), transverse diameter (P < 0.001) and longitudinal diameter (P < 0.001) measured on the cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of the submandibular stones, were identified and included in the predictive nomogram. Calibration curves of the nomogram showed good agreement between the predicted and observed probabilities in both sets. The C-index in the training set was 0.917 (95%CI, 0.875-0.959) and that in the testing set was 0.925 (95%CI, 0.862-0.989). CONCLUSION A nomogram based on the location, transverse and longitudinal diameters on CBCT images of submandibular stones showed satisfactory efficacy in predicting the risk of ERF preoperatively when treating submandibular stones.

[1]  C. Wittekindt,et al.  Sialolithiasis: aktuelle Diagnostik und Therapie , 2019, Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie.

[2]  M. B. Gillespie,et al.  Gland‐preserving surgery for salivary stones and the utility of sialendoscopes , 2018, Head & neck.

[3]  M. Turner Combined Surgical Approaches for the Removal of Submandibular Gland Sialoliths. , 2018, Atlas of the oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics of North America.

[4]  K. Kusama,et al.  Treatment outcomes of sialendoscopy for submandibular gland sialolithiasis: The minor axis of the sialolith is a regulative factor for the removal of sialoliths in the hilum of the submandibular gland using sialendoscopy alone. , 2017, Auris, nasus, larynx.

[5]  C. Chossegros,et al.  Salivary Calculi Removal by Minimally Invasive Techniques: A Decision Tree Based on the Diameter of the Calculi and Their Position in the Excretory Duct. , 2018, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[6]  D. Veivers,et al.  Prognostic factors for therapeutic sialendoscopy , 2017, The Journal of Laryngology &#x0026; Otology.

[7]  W. Szyfter,et al.  Sialendoscopy and sialendoscopically-assisted operations in the treatment of lithiasis of the submandibular and parotid glands: our experience of 239 cases. , 2016, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[8]  N. Schwartz,et al.  Combined approach sialendoscopy for management of submandibular gland sialolithiasis. , 2015, American journal of otolaryngology.

[9]  H. Iro,et al.  Nearly 3,000 salivary stones: Some clinical and epidemiologic aspects , 2015, The Laryngoscope.

[10]  O. Nahlieli Complications of sialendoscopy: personal experience, literature analysis, and suggestions. , 2015, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[11]  P. P. Singh,et al.  Sialendoscopy: Introduction, Indications and Technique , 2013, Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery.

[12]  H. Iro,et al.  Sialendoscopy in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Sialolithiasis , 2012, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[13]  J. Harrison Causes, natural history, and incidence of salivary stones and obstructions. , 2009, Otolaryngologic clinics of North America.

[14]  H. Iro,et al.  Algorithms for treatment of salivary gland obstructions. , 2009, Otolaryngologic clinics of North America.

[15]  R. Carrau,et al.  Combined approach technique for the management of large salivary stones , 2009, The Laryngoscope.

[16]  R. Carrau,et al.  Endoscopic sialolith removal: orientation and shape as predictors of success. , 2009, American Journal of Otolaryngology.

[17]  O. Nahlieli,et al.  Sialoendoscopy: A new approach to salivary gland obstructive pathology. , 2006, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[18]  P. Dulguerov,et al.  Sialolithiasis management: the state of the art. , 2003, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[19]  Y. Yoshimura,et al.  Salivary gland function after sialolithiasis: scintigraphic examination of submandibular glands with 99mTc-pertechnetate. , 1989, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.