A novel course paradigm for teaching collaborative product development in distributed environments

Collaborative product development (CPD) has recently become one of the important business strategies for the companies to remain competent in the Greater China region. Geographically separate companies such as design studios and manufacturers are required to participate in the product development process in a dispersed manner. Traditional product design courses may not be able to equip students with working knowledge in this regard. To overcome this deficiency, we have developed a novel course paradigm that combines two modular courses: manufacturing engineering (ME) and new product development (NPD). The students from the two courses are grouped into individual teams, and each team is required to complete a product development project within one semester. In each team, the ME students act as the engineering staff while the NPD students take the roles of marketing people and project managers. However, the ME and NPD students are required to collaborate remotely over the Internet. Face-to-face communication is deemed as being unavailable so as to mimic the real CPD scenarios. The tasks and materials involved in this new course include team building, project management, budget control, outsourcing, product design, prototyping, and ICT tools, e.g. teleconferencing, CAD, and PDM. The feedbacks from the graduated students working in industry validate the education goals in the course design.

[2]  Gary A. Gabriele,et al.  Product Design and Innovation: Evolution of an Interdisciplinary Design Curriculum* , 2003 .

[3]  Susan Carlson Skalak House of Quality , 2002 .

[4]  Gerard A. Athaide,et al.  Design and Implementation of an Interdisciplinary Marketing/Management Course on Technology and Innovation Management , 2005 .

[5]  Chih-Hsing Chu,et al.  Empirical Studies on Inter-Organizational Collaborative Product Development , 2006, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[6]  Shaligram Pokharel,et al.  VALUE OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT IN HIGH-TECH AND MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS , 2006 .

[7]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[8]  Charles V. Trappey,et al.  CONNECTING SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES TO THE GLOBAL MARKET VIA THE GLOBAL LOGISTICS SERVICE CHAIN—SECTOR ANALYSES AND CASE STUDIES , 2002 .

[9]  L.J. Leifer,et al.  Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[10]  William K. Durfee,et al.  Articles PERSPECTIVE: Experiential Education In New Product Design And Business Development , 2002 .

[11]  William K. Durfee,et al.  Experiential Education In New Product Design And Business Development , 2002 .

[12]  Esther P. Y. Tang,et al.  Innovation strategy and performance during economic transition : evidences in Beijing, China , 2009 .

[13]  Charles H. Fine,et al.  Interdisciplinary product design education , 1990 .

[14]  Marie C. Paretti,et al.  Identifying barriers to and outcomes of interdisciplinarity in the engineering classroom , 2009 .

[15]  Sebastian Fixson,et al.  Teaching innovation through interdisciplinary courses and programmes in product design and development: an analysis at 16 US schools , 2009, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[16]  T. Holmes Localization of Industry and Vertical Disintegration , 1999, Review of Economics and Statistics.