An integrated model for the environmental assessment of industrial products during the design process

The article presents a model to support designers and stakeholders when selecting the best product concepts, from among those in the course of development, assessing them from the sustainability point of view. The main aim of the article is to give the designer a road map, by which to collect and organize data, perform environmental analysis and compare different design alternatives, before the embodiment phase is completed. The model integrates different approaches: the use of a simplified life-cycle assessment to assess concepts when the information is poor or rough, performing the evaluation according to a set of environmental indicators; the employment of an augmented version of a design structure matrix, used to manage product components and functionalities; the use of a multi-criteria decision-making method to compare the environmental characteristics of design alternatives and a Pareto approach to select the most promising concepts. Finally, the design alternatives are expressed in terms of three dimensionless coordinates related to material wastes (α), energy dissipation (β) and environmental characteristics (γ) of the concept and are positioned in a three-dimensional environmental efficiency space to allow designers to visualize the position of each concept solution. The employment of an aggregate objective function and its geometric interpretation in the environmental efficiency space allows the designer to have a deeper knowledge of the choices to be made and how these can be taken more consciously. Furthermore, this final step can help designers and stakeholders in their reasoning about the environmental potentialities and drawbacks of the products in the phase of development. The whole model is applied to a case study where a group of five concepts of orange juicers are analysed and all the steps of the model are described in detail and discussed.

[1]  Biren Prasad.  Towards life–cycle measures and metrics for concurrent product development , 2002 .

[2]  Kevin Otto,et al.  Product Design: Techniques in Reverse Engineering and New Product Development , 2000 .

[3]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  A scheme for functional reasoning in conceptual design , 2001 .

[4]  Maurizio Cellura,et al.  Eco-sustainable energy and environmental strategies in design for recycling: the software “ENDLESS” , 2003 .

[5]  M. K. Starr,et al.  Executive decisions and operations research , 1970 .

[6]  Bruno Agard,et al.  A new method for evaluating the best product end-of-life strategy during the early design phase , 2012 .

[7]  D. Pennington,et al.  Life Cycle Impact Assessment Workshop Summary Midpoints versus Endpoints: The Sacrifices and Benefits , 2000 .

[8]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Selection of green product design scheme based on multi-attribute decision-making method , 2010 .

[9]  María D. Bovea,et al.  A taxonomy of ecodesign tools for integrating environmental requirements into the product design process , 2012 .

[10]  Karthik Ramani,et al.  Integrated Sustainable Life Cycle Design: A Review , 2010 .

[11]  Wim Dewulf,et al.  Simplifying LCA Using Indicator Approaches - A Framework - , 2003 .

[12]  M. Goedkoop,et al.  The Eco-indicator 99, A damage oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment , 1999 .

[13]  Luigi De Napoli,et al.  A Procedure for Early Environmental Assessment of Industrial Products , 2011 .

[14]  Vicky Lofthouse,et al.  Ecodesign tools for designers: defining the requirements , 2006 .

[15]  Sergio Rizzuti,et al.  A GRAPH-BASED APPROACH TO CHECK A PRODUCT FUNCTIONAL NET , 2006 .

[16]  Cassandra Telenko,et al.  A METHOD FOR DEVELOPING DESIGN FOR ENVIRONMENT GUIDELINES FOR FUTURE PRODUCT DESIGN , 2009 .

[17]  Simon Li,et al.  Matrix-based quality tools for concept generation in eco-design , 2016, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[18]  Irem Y. Tumer,et al.  Automating Environmental Impact Assessment during the Conceptual Phase of Product Design , 2011, AAAI Spring Symposium: Artificial Intelligence and Sustainable Design.

[19]  Warit Jawjit,et al.  Assessing environmental performance by combining life cycle assessment, multi-criteria analysis and environmental performance indicators , 2007 .

[20]  T.A. Bhamra,et al.  Integrating environmental decisions into the product development process. I. The early stages , 1999, Proceedings First International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing.

[21]  Wim Dewulf,et al.  Estimating the environmental profile of early design concepts , 2005 .

[22]  Sergio Rizzuti,et al.  COMPARISON OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS OF FUNCTIONALLY EQUIVALENT DEVICES BY WEIGHTED PRODUCT METHOD , 2012 .

[23]  Sylvia Encheva,et al.  Multi-criteria decision-making , 2009 .

[24]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Integration analysis of product decompositions , 1994 .

[25]  Patrick Hofstetter,et al.  Midpoints versus endpoints: The sacrifices and benefits , 2000 .

[26]  Srikanth Devanathan,et al.  Integration of Sustainability Into Early Design Through the Function Impact Matrix , 2010 .

[27]  Biren Prasad,et al.  Development of New Products in Small Companies , 2001, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[28]  Hua Li,et al.  An energy factor based systematic approach to energy-saving product design , 2010 .

[29]  Sergio Rizzuti,et al.  A Proposal For an Augmented DSM to Assess Product Sustainability , 2011 .

[30]  Jo Dewulf,et al.  Life Cycle Analysis to estimate the environmental impact of residential photovoltaic systems in regions with a low solar irradiation , 2011 .

[31]  Yasushi Umeda,et al.  Generating design alternatives for increasing recyclability of products , 2013 .

[32]  Jan-Gunnar Persson,et al.  Eco-indicators in product development , 2001 .

[33]  Sami Kara,et al.  Simplified Lifecycle Assessment for the Early Design Stages of Industrial Products , 2003 .

[34]  Irem Y. Tumer,et al.  Integrating Life Cycle Assessment Into the Conceptual Phase of Design Using a Design Repository , 2010 .

[35]  Han Brezet,et al.  Ecodesign : a promising approach to sustainable production and consumption , 1997 .

[36]  Simon Li,et al.  Matrix-based hierarchical clustering for developing product architecture , 2016, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[37]  S. Ashley,et al.  Designing for the environment , 1993 .

[38]  Boris Eisenbart,et al.  A DSM-based framework for integrated function modelling: concept, application and evaluation , 2016, Research in Engineering Design.

[39]  D. V. Steward,et al.  The design structure system: A method for managing the design of complex systems , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[40]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Design Structure Matrix Methods and Applications , 2012 .