Economic impacts and impact dynamics of Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) cotton in India

Despite widespread adoption of genetically modified crops in many countries, heated controversies about their advantages and disadvantages continue. Especially for developing countries, there are concerns that genetically modified crops fail to benefit smallholder farmers and contribute to social and economic hardship. Many economic studies contradict this view, but most of them look at short-term impacts only, so that uncertainty about longer-term effects prevails. We address this shortcoming by analyzing economic impacts and impact dynamics of Bt cotton in India. Building on unique panel data collected between 2002 and 2008, and controlling for nonrandom selection bias in technology adoption, we show that Bt has caused a 24% increase in cotton yield per acre through reduced pest damage and a 50% gain in cotton profit among smallholders. These benefits are stable; there are even indications that they have increased over time. We further show that Bt cotton adoption has raised consumption expenditures, a common measure of household living standard, by 18% during the 2006–2008 period. We conclude that Bt cotton has created large and sustainable benefits, which contribute to positive economic and social development in India.

[1]  R. Bennett,et al.  Bias from farmer self-selection in genetically modified crop productivity estimates: Evidence from Indian data , 2007 .

[2]  Scott Rozelle,et al.  Five years of Bt cotton in China - the benefits continue. , 2002, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[3]  M. Qaim,et al.  Bt Cotton in India: Development of Benefits and the Role of Government Seed Price Interventions , 2009 .

[4]  Richard Bennett,et al.  Economic Impact of Genetically Modified Cotton in India , 2004 .

[5]  M. Qaim,et al.  The Impact of Bt Cotton on Poor Households in Rural India , 2008 .

[6]  J. Carpenter,et al.  Peer-reviewed surveys indicate positive impact of commercialized GM crops , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[7]  A. Deaton The Analysis of Household Surveys : A Microeconometric Approach to Development Policy , 1997 .

[8]  R. Bennett,et al.  Inequality and GM Crops: A Case-Study of Bt Cotton in India , 2007 .

[9]  B. Tabashnik Delaying insect resistance to transgenic crops , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  V. Krishna,et al.  Bt cotton and sustainability of pesticide reductions in India , 2012 .

[11]  G. Gruère,et al.  Bt Cotton and Farmer Suicides in India: An Evidence-based Assessment , 2011, The journal of development studies.

[12]  V. Krishna,et al.  Potential impacts of Bt eggplant on economic surplus and farmers' health in India , 2008 .

[13]  Shahzad Kouser,et al.  Impact of Bt cotton on pesticide poisoning in smallholder agriculture: A panel data analysis , 2011 .

[14]  Kongming Wu,et al.  Suppression of Cotton Bollworm in Multiple Crops in China in Areas with Bt Toxin–Containing Cotton , 2008, Science.

[15]  Scott Rozelle,et al.  Bt Cotton in China: Are Secondary Insect Infestations Offsetting the Benefits in Farmer Fields? , 2009 .

[16]  A. Abdulai,et al.  The Adoption of Genetically Modified Cotton and Poverty Reduction in Pakistan , 2010 .

[17]  D. Gurian-Sherman failure to yield Evaluating the Performance of Genetically Engineered Crops , 2009 .

[18]  David Zilberman,et al.  Adoption of Bt Cotton and Impact Variability: Insights from India , 2006 .

[19]  G. Stone Field versus Farm in Warangal: Bt Cotton, Higher Yields, and Larger Questions , 2011 .

[20]  Guillaume P. Gruère,et al.  Measuring the contribution of Bt cotton adoption to India's cotton yields leap , 2012 .

[21]  Badi H. Baltagi,et al.  Unbalanced panel data: A survey , 2006 .

[22]  C. Barrett,et al.  Better Technology, Better Plots, or Better Farmers? Identifying Changes in Productivity and Risk Among Malagasy Rice Farmers , 2004 .

[23]  D. Glover Is Bt Cotton a Pro-Poor Technology? A Review and Critique of the Empirical Record , 2010 .

[24]  Rosalind J Wright,et al.  Areawide Suppression of European Corn Borer with Bt Maize Reaps Savings to Non-Bt Maize Growers , 2010, Science.

[25]  P. Pinstrup-Andersen,et al.  Bt-cotton and secondary pests , 2008 .

[26]  Jikun Huang,et al.  A decade of Bt cotton in Chinese fields: Assessing the direct effects and indirect externalities of Bt cotton adoption in China , 2010, Science China Life Sciences.

[27]  M. Qaim The Economics of Genetically Modified Crops , 2009 .

[28]  David Zilberman,et al.  Yield Effects of Genetically Modified Crops in Developing Countries , 2003, Science.

[29]  R. Bennett,et al.  Farm-Level Economic Performance of Genetically Modified Cotton in Maharashtra, India , 2006 .