MAIN ISSUES ON THE SEISMIC DESIGN OF INDUSTRIAL PIPING SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS

A significant number of damages in piping systems and components during recent seismic events have been reported in literature which calls for a proper seismic design of these structures. Nevertheless, there exists an inadequacy of proper seismic analysis and design rules for a piping system and its components. Current seismic design Codes are found to be over conservative and some components, e.g., bolted flange joints, do not have guidelines for their seismic design. Along this line, this paper discusses about the main issues on the seismic analysis and design of industrial piping systems and components. Initially, seismic analysis and component design of refinery piping systems are described. A review of current design approaches suggested by European (EN13480:3) and American (ASME B31.3) Codes is performed through a Case Study on a piping system. Some limits of available Codes are identified and a number of critical aspects of the problem e. g., dynamic interaction between pipes and rack, correct definition of the response factor and strain versus stress approach, are illustrated. Finally, seismic performance of bolted flange joints based on the results of experimental investigations carried out by the University of Trento, Italy, will be discussed.

[1]  Mahmood Hosseini,et al.  A Verification Study of ASCE Recommended Guidelines for Seismic Evaluation and Design of Combination Structures in Petrochemical Facilities , 2009 .

[2]  Ayman Saudy.  Seismic analysis of multiply-supported MDOF secondary systems , 1992 .

[3]  Hiroe Kobayashi,et al.  Dynamic response of piping system on rack structure with gaps and frictions , 1989 .

[4]  Iunio Iervolino,et al.  REXEL: computer aided record selection for code-based seismic structural analysis , 2010 .

[5]  Spyros A. Karamanos,et al.  Ultimate Bending Capacity and Buckling of Pressurized 90 deg Steel Elbows , 2006 .

[6]  Armen Der Kiureghian,et al.  Floor response spectrum method for seismic analysis of multiply supported secondary systems , 1986 .

[7]  P. Sollogoub,et al.  Seismic behaviour of piping systems with and without defects: experimental and numerical evaluations , 1999 .

[8]  Sassan Eshghi,et al.  THE BEHAVIOR OF SPECIAL STRUCTURES DURING THE BAM EARTHQUAKE OF 26 DECEMBER 2003 , 2004 .

[9]  Spyros A. Karamanos,et al.  Steel Elbow Response Under Strong Cyclic Loading , 2012 .

[10]  P. Sollogoub,et al.  Enhanced seismic criteria for piping , 2006 .

[11]  Andrew S. Whittaker,et al.  Seismic Performance of Industrial Facilities Affected by the 1999 Turkey Earthquake , 2006 .

[12]  Anil Kumar,et al.  Seismic Performance of Bolted Flange Joints in Piping Systems for Oil and Gas Industries , 2012 .

[13]  Susumu Iai,et al.  Reconnaissance Report of July 16, 2007 Niigata-Ken Chuetsu-Oki, Japan, Earthquake , 2007 .

[14]  Ricardo A. Burdisso,et al.  Multiply supported secondary systems part I: Response spectrum analysis , 1987 .

[15]  Anil Kumar,et al.  Enhanced seismic performance of non-standard bolted flange joints for petrochemical piping systems , 2014 .

[16]  Spyros A. Karamanos,et al.  Nonlinear Response and Failure of Steel Elbows Under In-Plane Bending and Pressure , 2003 .

[17]  Ayman M. Okeil,et al.  Effects of ductility on seismic response of piping systems and their implication on design and qualification , 1996 .