Nonlinear postural control in response to visual translation

Recent models of human postural control have focused on the nonlinear properties inherent to fusing sensory information from multiple modalities. In general, these models are underconstrained, requiring additional experimental data to clarify the properties of such nonlinearities. Here we report an experiment suggesting that new or multiple mechanisms may be needed to capture the integration of vision into the postural control scheme. Subjects were presented with visual displays whose motion consisted of two components: a constant-amplitude, 0.2 Hz oscillation, and constant-velocity translation from left to right at velocities between 0 cm/s and 4 cm/s. Postural sway variability increased systematically with translation velocity, but remained below that observed in the eyes-closed condition, indicating that the postural control system is able to use visual information to stabilize sway even at translation velocities as high as 4 cm/s. Gain initially increased as translation velocity increased from 0 cm/s to 1 cm/s and then decreased. The changes in gain and variability provided a clear indication of nonlinearity in the postural response across conditions, which were interpreted in terms of sensory reweighting. The fact that gain did not decrease at low translation velocities suggests that the postural control system is able to decompose relative visual motion into environmental motion and self-motion. The eventual decrease in gain suggests that nonlinearities in sensory noise levels (state-dependent noise) may also contribute to the sensory reweighting involved in postural control. These results provide important constraints and suggest that multiple mechanisms may be required to model the nonlinearities involved in sensory fusion for upright stance control.

[1]  Marjorie H. Woollacott,et al.  Aging and Posture Control: Changes in Sensory Organization and Muscular Coordination , 1986, International journal of aging & human development.

[2]  C. Gielen,et al.  Temporal stability of the action-perception cycle for postural control in a moving visual environment , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  F. O. Black,et al.  Adaptation to altered support and visual conditions during stance: patients with vestibular deficits , 1982, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[4]  Robert J Peterka,et al.  Dynamic regulation of sensorimotor integration in human postural control. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  H. Keselman,et al.  Multiple Comparison Procedures , 2005 .

[6]  Frans C. T. van der Helm,et al.  An adaptive model of sensory integration in a dynamic environment applied to human stance control , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[7]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning , 1998, Nature.

[8]  Kelvin S. Oie,et al.  Multisensory fusion: simultaneous re-weighting of vision and touch for the control of human posture. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[9]  R. Peterka Sensorimotor integration in human postural control. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  Tim Kiemel,et al.  Multisensory information for human postural control: integrating touch and vision , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  A. Bronstein,et al.  Suppression of visually evoked postural responses , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  Tim Kiemel,et al.  Multisensory fusion and the stochastic structure of postural sway , 2002, Biological Cybernetics.

[13]  B. Porat,et al.  Digital Spectral Analysis with Applications. , 1988 .

[14]  R. Peterka,et al.  Role of somatosensory and vestibular cues in attenuating visually induced human postural sway , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  Herman van der Kooij,et al.  A multisensory integration model of human stance control , 1999, Biological Cybernetics.

[16]  Martin A. Giese,et al.  Frequency dependence of the action-perception cycle for postural control in a moving visual environment: relative phase dynamics , 1994, Biological Cybernetics.

[17]  F O Black,et al.  Vestibulo-spinal control differs in patients with reduced versus distorted vestibular function. , 1984, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[18]  M. Woollacott,et al.  Attentional demands and postural control: the effect of sensory context. , 2000, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[19]  G E Stelmach,et al.  Postural sway characteristics of the elderly under normal and altered visual and support surface conditions. , 1991, Journal of gerontology.

[20]  David A. Winter,et al.  Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement , 1990 .

[21]  W. Warren,et al.  The role of central and peripheral vision in postural control duringwalking , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  L. Rowell,et al.  Exercise : regulation and integration of multiple systems , 1996 .

[23]  F. O. Black,et al.  Abnormal postural control associated with peripheral vestibular disorders. , 1988, Progress in brain research.

[24]  L. Wolfson,et al.  Gait and balance in the elderly. Two functional capacities that link sensory and motor ability to falls. , 1985, Clinics in geriatric medicine.

[25]  C Maurer,et al.  A multisensory posture control model of human upright stance. , 2003, Progress in brain research.