Case Report: The Development of a Highly Constrained Health Level 7 Implementation Guide to Facilitate Electronic Laboratory Reporting to Ambulatory Electronic Health Record Systems

Electronic laboratory interfaces can significantly increase the value of ambulatory electronic health record (EHR) systems by providing laboratory result data automatically and in a computable form. However, many ambulatory EHRs cannot implement electronic laboratory interfaces despite the existence of messaging standards, such as Health Level 7, version 2 (HL7). Among several barriers to implementing laboratory interfaces is the extensive optionality within the HL7 message standard. This paper describes the rationale for and development of an HL7 implementation guide that seeks to eliminate most of the optionality inherent in HL7, but retain the information content required for reporting outpatient laboratory results. A work group of heterogeneous stakeholders developed the implementation guide based on a set of design principles that emphasized parsimony, practical requirements, and near-term adoption. The resulting implementation guide contains 93% fewer optional data elements than HL7. This guide was successfully implemented by 15 organizations during an initial testing phase and has been approved by the HL7 standards body as an implementation guide for outpatient laboratory reporting. Further testing is required to determine whether widespread adoption of the implementation guide by laboratories and EHR systems can facilitate the implementation of electronic laboratory interfaces.

[1]  Sowmya R. Rao,et al.  Electronic health records in ambulatory care--a national survey of physicians. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  I. Sim,et al.  Physicians' use of electronic medical records: barriers and solutions. , 2004, Health affairs.

[3]  Rainu Kaushal,et al.  Physicians and electronic health records: a statewide survey. , 2007, Archives of internal medicine.

[4]  Daniel J. Vreeman,et al.  Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC®) users' guide , 2010 .

[5]  D. Bates,et al.  Electronic health record use and the quality of ambulatory care in the United States. , 2007, Archives of internal medicine.

[6]  Claire V Broome,et al.  Public Health Information Network--improving early detection by using a standards-based approach to connecting public health and clinical medicine. , 2004, MMWR supplements.

[7]  Karim Keshavjee,et al.  Measuring the success of electronic medical record implementation using electronic and survey data , 2001, AMIA.

[8]  Ken Terry Why EHRs falter. , 2006, Medical economics.

[9]  Gunnar H. Nilsson,et al.  Clinical effect of computer generated physician reminders in health screening in primary health care - a controlled clinical trial of preventive services among the elderly , 2004, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[10]  Tim Benson,et al.  HL7 Version 2 , 2010 .

[11]  Sara Rosenbaum,et al.  How common are electronic health records in the United States? A summary of the evidence. , 2006, Health affairs.

[12]  Blackford Middleton,et al.  Viewpoint Paper: Accelerating U.S. EHR Adoption: How to Get There From Here. Recommendations Based on the 2004 ACMI Retreat , 2005, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[13]  P. Gabow,et al.  The Effect of Automated Alerts on Provider Ordering Behavior in an Outpatient Setting , 2005, PLoS medicine.

[14]  Lee Min Lau,et al.  Mapping Department of Defense Laboratory Results to Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC®) , 2005, AMIA.

[15]  S. Schoenbaum,et al.  Information technologies: when will they make it into physicians' black bags? , 2004, MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine.

[16]  David W Bates,et al.  "I wish I had seen this test result earlier!": Dissatisfaction with test result management systems in primary care. , 2004, Archives of internal medicine.

[17]  Amy N. Cohen,et al.  Review paper: Informatics Systems to Promote Improved Care for Chronic Illness: A Literature Review , 2007, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[18]  W J Hall,et al.  Computer-based vs manual health maintenance tracking. A controlled trial. , 1994, Archives of family medicine.

[19]  C. O. Kennedy A controlled trial , 1971, British Homeopathic Journal.