Introduction to an occupant behavior motivation survey framework

Author(s): D'Oca, Simona; Corgnati, Stefano; Pisello, Anna L; Hong, Tianzhen | Abstract: An increasing body of research is underlying the need to foster energy behaviors and interaction with technology as a way to achieve energy savings in office buildings. However, engaging office users into more “forgiving” comfort-adaptive behavior is not a trivial task, since neither consequences nor benefits for changing behavior have visible or tangible effects on them personally. Since the 70’s, survey studies in the field of building science have been used to gain better understanding of multidisciplinary drivers of occupant behavior with respect to comfort and energy requirements in buildings. Rather than focusing on individual behaviors – and influencing factors – purpose of this survey research is to provide quantitative descriptions on the collective and social motivations within the complexity of different social groups in working environment, under different geographical context, culture and norms. The resultant questionnaire survey emerges as a combination of traditional and adaptive comfort theories, merged with social science theory. The questionnaire explores to what extent the occupant energy-related behavior in working spaces is driven by a motivational sphere influenced by i) comfort requirements, ii) habits, iii) intentions and iv) actual control of building systems. The key elements of the proposed occupant behavior motivational framework are grounded on the Driver Need Action System framework for energy-related behaviors in buildings. Goal of the study is to construct an additional layer of standardized knowledge to enrich the state-of-the-art on energy-related behavior in office buildings

[1]  Tianzhen Hong,et al.  Occupant Behavior: Impact onEnergy Use of Private Offices , 2013 .

[2]  E. Shove,et al.  Debating the future of comfort: environmental sustainability, energy consumption and the indoor environment , 2005 .

[3]  Gail Brager,et al.  Adaptive Comfort in Mixed-Mode Buildings: Research Support Facility, National Renewable Energy Lab , 2013 .

[4]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[5]  W. J. Fisk,et al.  Room temperature and productivity in office work , 2006 .

[6]  Z. Lian,et al.  Quantitative measurement of productivity loss due to thermal discomfort , 2011 .

[7]  Alex Summerfield,et al.  Challenges and future directions for energy and buildings research , 2012 .

[8]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Support for environmental protection: The role of moral norms , 1985 .

[9]  E. Shove Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: The Social Organization of Normality , 2003 .

[10]  Sami Karjalainen,et al.  User problems with individual temperature control in offices , 2007 .

[11]  G. Antonides,et al.  The Norm Activation Model: An exploration of the functions of anticipated pride and guilt in pro-environmental behaviour , 2013 .

[12]  Tianzhen Hong,et al.  An ontology to represent energy-related occupant behavior in buildings. Part I: Introduction to the DNAs framework , 2015 .

[13]  Angela P. Wetzel Internet, mail, and mixed‐mode surveys: The tailored design method , 2010 .

[14]  Zosia Brown,et al.  Feedback and adaptive behaviour in green buildings , 2009 .

[15]  Adrian Leaman,et al.  Are users more tolerant of ‘green’ buildings? , 2007 .

[16]  Masanori Shukuya,et al.  Investigation on the effectiveness of various methods of information dissemination aiming at a change of occupant behaviour related to thermal comfort and exergy consumption , 2011 .

[17]  Kathryn H. Healey Unforgivable: exploring thermal comfort, adaptation, and forgiveness in a problem green office building , 2013 .

[18]  Richard de Dear,et al.  Green occupants for green buildings: The missing link? , 2012 .

[19]  Kirsten Gram-Hanssen,et al.  New needs for better understanding of household's energy consumption – behaviour, lifestyle or practices? , 2014 .

[20]  Francesco Asdrubali,et al.  Human-based energy retrofits in residential buildings: A cost-effective alternative to traditional physical strategies , 2014 .

[21]  Edward Arens,et al.  Data Collection Methods for Assessing Adaptive Comfort in Mixed-Mode Buildings and Personal Comfort Systems , 2012 .

[22]  Henk Staats,et al.  Situational and Personality Factors as Direct or Personal Norm Mediated Predictors of Pro-environmental Behavior: Questions Derived From Norm-activation Theory , 2007 .