Personal Attribute Models of the Voting Behavior of U.S. Supreme Court Justices: Liberalism in Civil Liberties and Economics Decisions, 1946–1978

The prevailing view among students of judicial politics is that judges' background characteristics or personal attributes cannot provide satisfactory explanations for variation in their decision-making behavior. Parsimonious attribute models reported here account for 70 to 90 percent of the variance in the voting of postwar Supreme Court justices in split decisions concerning civil rights and liberties, and economics. Seven variables representing six meaningful and easily interpretable concepts achieve this success. The concepts are Judge's Party Identification, Appointing President, Prestige of Prelaw Education (economics only), Appointed from Elective Office, Appointment Region (civil liberties only), Extensiveness of Judicial Experience , and Type of Prosecutorial Experience . The impressive performance of these models is attributed to superior measurement, operationalization, and model building; to a greater similarity between personal attribute models and more fully specified ones than has been assumed; and to the possibility that the attitudes which intervene between the personal attributes and the voting of judges are causally very closely linked to voting.

[1]  E. Muller,et al.  Frontiers of judicial research , 1969 .

[2]  C. M. Lamb.  Exploring the Conservatism of Federal Appeals Court Judges , 1976 .

[3]  S. Goldman.  Voting Behavior on the United States Courts of Appeals Revisited , 1975, American Political Science Review.

[4]  Austin D. Sarat,et al.  American court systems : readings in judicial process and behavior , 1978 .

[5]  J. Tanenhaus,et al.  The study of public law , 1972 .

[6]  S. Ulmer.  The Longitudinal Behavior of Hugo Lafayette Black: Parabolic Support for Civil Liberties, 1937-1971 , 1973 .

[7]  Benjamin I. Page,et al.  Reciprocal Effects of Policy Preferences, Party Loyalties and the Vote , 1979, American Political Science Review.

[8]  The Judicial Mind Revisited: Psychometric Analysis of Supreme Court Ideology , 1977 .

[9]  J. Howard.  Role Perceptions and Behavior in Three U.S. Courts of Appeals , 1977, The Journal of Politics.

[10]  The judicial mind : the attitudes and ideologies of Supreme Court justices, 1946-1963 , 1966 .

[11]  J. Grossman.  Social Backgrounds and Judicial Decision-Making , 1966 .

[12]  Richard D. Schwartz,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Judicial Behavior. , 1960 .

[13]  J. Schmidhauser.  The Justices of the Supreme Court: A Collective Portrait , 1959, The Path To and From the Supreme Court.

[14]  R. Scigliano.  The Supreme Court and the Presidency , 1971 .

[15]  H. Abraham.  The Judicial process : an introductory analysis of the courts of the United States, England, and France , 1982 .

[16]  S. Ulmer.  Social Background as an Indicator to the Votes of Supreme Court Justices in Criminal Cases: 1947-1956 Terms , 1973 .

[17]  T. Becker.  Comparative judicial politics : the political functionings of courts , 1970 .

[18]  G. Schubert,et al.  Judicial behavior : a reader in theory and research , 1965 .

[19]  S. Nagel.  Political Party Affiliation and Judges' Decisions , 1961, American Political Science Review.

[20]  H. Spaeth.  Supreme Court Policy Making: Explanation and Prediction , 1979 .

[21]  Kenneth N. Vines.  Federal District Judges and Race Relations Cases in the South , 1964, The Journal of Politics.

[22]  D. Warwick,et al.  Comparative research methods , 1973 .

[23]  C. Tate,et al.  The Supreme Court in American Politics : Policy Through Law , 1975 .

[24]  S. Goldman.  Voting Behavior on the United States Courts of Appeals, 1961–1964 , 1966, American Political Science Review.

[25]  J. Gibson.  Judges' Role Orientations, Attitudes, and Decisions: An Interactive Model , 1978, American Political Science Review.

[26]  A. Przeworski,et al.  The logic of comparative social inquiry , 1970 .

[27]  M. Dicker,et al.  The Methodology of Comparative Research. , 1970 .