Portable fetal ECG extractor from abdECG

This paper aims at creating an affordable fECG extractor by simplifying the process of fECG extraction from abdECG. Even though invasive fECG extraction is more accurate, noninvasive method of extraction has been preferred during prenatal considering the fetus's health. This makes the noninvasive fECG extraction an emerging and required field of research. This paper gives a fundamental idea to create a prototype for extracting the fetal ECG from abdominal ECG. The abdECG has been preprocessed by normalization and filtering. Based on thresholding and first order differentiation, the maternal peak has been identified from the preprocessed abdECG signal. Using the identified maternal peaks, QRS complex of mECG has been identified and the same has been cancelled out from abdECG to cull out the fECG. The resultant signal has been a combination of fECG and noise. The fetal peaks have been identified from the culled out signal. The identified fetal peaks provide information like the QRS complex of the fetus, fetus heart rate, diagnosis of any congenital disorder and other anomalies. This simplified algorithm has been implemented with high level language C and executed using Raspberry Pi. The execution results with a second delay and Raspberry Pi can create a standalone platform at any place and is handy. The system resulted in 100% accuracy when the selected channel happened to be near the fetus's heart. Even in other cases, it has proven to be good and effective. This shows that the system is affordable and practically useable.

[1]  Giuseppe Andreoni,et al.  Prototype of a wearable system for remote fetal monitoring during pregnancy , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[2]  Giuseppe Andreoni,et al.  Telefetalcare: A first prototype of a wearable fetal electrocardiograph , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[3]  E. Ferrazzi,et al.  Fetal and maternal heart rate confusion during intra-partum monitoring: comparison of trans-abdominal fetal electrocardiogram and Doppler telemetry , 2012, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[4]  B. Hayes-Gill,et al.  Intrapartum signal quality with external fetal heart rate monitoring: a two way trial of external Doppler CTG ultrasound and the abdominal fetal electrocardiogram , 2012, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[5]  Jun Yong,et al.  The prevalence of diastolic dysfunction in patients with hypertension referred for echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular function. , 2004, The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS.

[6]  K. I. Ramachandran,et al.  A Simplified Approach to Identify the Fetal ECG from abdECG and to Measure the fHR , 2015 .

[7]  S. Cousens,et al.  4 million neonatal deaths: When? Where? Why? , 2005, The Lancet.

[8]  K R Greene The ECG waveform. , 1987, Bailliere's clinical obstetrics and gynaecology.

[9]  M. M. Mc Loughlin,et al.  Cardiac auscultation: preliminary findings of a pilot study using continuous Wave Doppler and comparison with classic auscultation. , 2013, International journal of cardiology.

[10]  R. E. Tainsh,et al.  Fetal heart rate monitoring. , 1983, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.