Uncertainty of nitrate‐N load computations for agricultural watersheds

[1] Water quality samples for most streams are collected at variable frequencies within monitoring periods of different lengths. On the basis of discrete concentration data obtained from these monitoring studies, loads of various pollutants passing through a gaging station for selected periods may be calculated using various load estimation methods. In this paper, nitrate-N load estimates were compared with their “true” values, calculated using 6 years of daily nitrate-N concentration and average discharge data at an agricultural watershed in central Illinois. A Monte Carlo subsampling study was conducted to simulate different sampling scenarios for variable sampling frequencies and different monitoring durations. Load calculations were compared for each sampling scenario based on rating curve, ratio estimator, and flow-weighted average estimator. In addition, two bias correction techniques (minimum variance unbiased estimator (MVUE) and smearing estimator) were applied to the rating curve method. The monitoring durations were 1, 2, 3, and 6 years, and the sampling frequencies ranged from weekly to bimonthly. The results demonstrated that a desired accuracy of the estimates could be achieved either by sampling more frequently or by monitoring the site longer. Although the ratio and the flow-weighted average estimators had a small negative bias, in most cases rating curve estimators were positively biased when applied to the study site. Also, neither of the two bias correction techniques, MVUE and smearing estimator, decreased this positive bias. On the contrary, those techniques produced a higher bias, which resulted in increased root-mean-square error (RMSE). The rating curve uncorrected for bias, the simple ratio, and the flow-weighted estimator had a significantly smaller RMSE for all sampling frequencies and all periods of record than the bias-corrected rating curve methods.

[1]  Dale M. Robertson,et al.  Influence of various water quality sampling strategies on load estimates for small streams , 1999 .

[2]  Timothy A. Cohn,et al.  Recent advances in statistical methods for the estimation of sediment and nutrient transport in rivers , 1995 .

[3]  R. Ferguson River Loads Underestimated by Rating Curves , 1986 .

[4]  David M. Dolan,et al.  Evaluation of River Load Estimation Methods for Total Phosphorus , 1981 .

[5]  T. Unny,et al.  Sampling Strategies for Mass‐Discharge Estimation , 1983 .

[6]  Roy W. Koch,et al.  Bias in Hydrologic Prediction Using Log-Transformed Regression Models , 1986 .

[7]  W. W. Walker Simplified Procedures for Eutrophication Assessment and Prediction: User Manual , 1996 .

[8]  R. Peter Richards,et al.  Monte Carlo studies of sampling strategies for estimating tributary loads , 1987 .

[9]  Misganaw Demissie,et al.  Watershed approach for the protection of drinking water supplies in central illinois , 1998 .

[10]  J. Mandrup-Poulsen Findings of the National Research Council’s Committee on Assessing the TMDL Approach to Water Quality Management , 2002 .

[11]  Deva K. Borah,et al.  Watershed Monitoring and Land Use Evaluation for the Lake Decatur Watershed , 1994 .

[12]  Desmond E. Walling,et al.  The reliability of suspended sediment load data , 1981 .

[13]  R. Ferguson Accuracy and precision of methods for estimating river loads , 1987 .

[14]  Richard P. Hooper,et al.  Flux and Sources of Nutrients in the Mississippi-Atchafalaya River Basin , 1999 .

[15]  F. H. Verhoff,et al.  River Nutrient and Chemical Transport Estimation , 1980 .

[16]  Robert M. Summers,et al.  The validity of a simple statistical model for estimating fluvial constituent loads: An Empirical study involving nutrient loads entering Chesapeake Bay , 1992 .

[17]  Robert M. Hirsch,et al.  Estimating constituent loads , 1989 .

[18]  N. Duan Smearing Estimate: A Nonparametric Retransformation Method , 1983 .

[19]  V. J. Bierman,et al.  An evaluation of methods for the estimation of tributary mass loads , 1989 .