The distribution of partnership returns: Evidence from co-authorships in economics journals

Partnerships can be found in many areas of social and economic life. These arrangements have become particularly common in research and development activities where organizations increasingly look for partners to complement their own technological capabilities with a view to create innovative products and processes. R&D partnerships, however, are fraught with challenges because the conditions for creativity through cooperation are still not fully understood. Academic partnerships are also very common and offer a fertile ground for investigation. Academic cooperation takes many different forms and results in a wide range of outcomes (Laband and Tollison, 2000). One of the most visible outcomes is co-authored publications (Melin and Persson, 1996). Nowadays, there is extensive data available about both the context of these partnerships as well as the quality of their outcome. This paper explores the determinants of the gain for authors who cooperate through co-authorship in the publication of academic articles. We distinguish between short-term benefits (i.e. the increase in citations of the co-authored article relative to the authors’ previous publications) and the long-term ones (i.e. the increase in citations of articles subsequent to the co-authored piece). We find evidence that these benefits have different determinants for co-authors depending on their past experience. While co-authorship generally seems to benefit more the junior (younger and with a lower academic reputation) author, the senior partner can reduce the gap with a strong personal track record and co-authoring experience.

[1]  P. Ritala,et al.  Social Network Analysis of the ISPIM Innovation Management Community , 2012 .

[2]  C. Reed,et al.  Sharing Assumptions and Negotiating Boundaries: Coauthorship as a Tool for Teaching and Learning , 2002 .

[3]  N. Venkatraman,et al.  Joint Venture Formations and Stock Market Reactions: An Assessment in the Information Technology Sector , 2011 .

[4]  David N. Laband,et al.  The determinants of article popularity: Preliminary results , 1985 .

[5]  W. Glänzel,et al.  Analysing Scientific Networks Through Co-Authorship , 2004 .

[6]  P. Ring,et al.  Relational Quality: Managing Trust in Corporate Alliances , 2001 .

[7]  M. Kocher,et al.  Patterns of co-authorship among economics departments in the USA , 2004 .

[8]  William B. Walstad,et al.  Views of Teaching and Research in Economics and Other Disciplines , 2005 .

[9]  P. Shapira,et al.  Organizational and institutional influences on creativity in scientific research , 2009 .

[10]  D. Laband,et al.  The Relative Impacts of Economics Journals: 1970-1990 , 1994 .

[11]  Sofy Carayannopoulos,et al.  External knowledge sourcing in biotechnology through acquisition versus alliance: A KBV approach , 2010 .

[12]  John J. McConnell,et al.  Corporate Combinations and Common Stock Returns: The Case of Joint Ventures , 1985 .

[13]  Kee H. Chung,et al.  Publishing behavior of individuals and most prolific authors in the economics literature , 1993 .

[14]  Tim Minshall,et al.  Making “Asymmetric” Partnerships Work , 2010 .

[15]  Pierre Azoulay,et al.  Incentives and Creativity: Evidence from the Academic Life Sciences , 2009 .

[16]  A. Hollis Co-authorship and the output of academic economists , 2001 .

[17]  P. Ring,et al.  Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations , 1992 .

[18]  T. Das,et al.  A Resource-Based Theory of Strategic Alliances , 2000 .

[19]  J. Child,et al.  Cooperative Strategy: Managing Alliances, Networks, and Joint Ventures , 1998 .

[20]  Necmi Kemal Avkiran,et al.  Scientific collaboration in finance does not lead to better quality research , 2006, Scientometrics.

[21]  Olle Persson,et al.  Studying research collaboration using co-authorships , 1996, Scientometrics.

[22]  Bruna Bruno,et al.  Economics of co-authorship , 2014 .

[23]  D. Simonton,et al.  Age and outstanding achievement: what do we know after a century of research? , 1988, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  Pierre Azoulay,et al.  Matthew: Effect or Fable? , 2012, Manag. Sci..

[25]  Francisco J. Acedo,et al.  Co-Authorship in Management and Organizational Studies: An Empirical and Network Analysis , 2006 .

[26]  Kevin Zheng Zhou,et al.  Alternative Origins to Interorganizational Trust: An Interdependence Perspective on the Shadow of the Past and the Shadow of the Future , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[27]  Fabian Waldinger,et al.  Quality Matters: The Expulsion of Professors and the Consequences for PhD Student Outcomes in Nazi Germany , 2010, Journal of Political Economy.

[28]  Marshall H. Medoff,et al.  Collaboration and the quality of economics research , 2003 .

[29]  S. Sengupta,et al.  Impact of Strategic Alliances on Firm Valuation , 1998 .

[30]  R. Gulati,et al.  Does familiarity breed trust? Revisiting the antecedents of trust , 2008 .

[31]  Guillermo Andrés Lemarchand,et al.  The long-term dynamics of co-authorship scientific networks: Iberoamerican countries (1973–2010) , 2012 .

[32]  Guillermo A. Lemarchand,et al.  The long-term dynamics of co-authorship scientific networks, Iberoamerican Countries (1973-2006) , 2010, ArXiv.

[33]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  Splitting the pie: rent distribution in alliances and networks , 2008 .

[34]  Jacques Mairesse,et al.  Measurement and Explanation of the Intensity of Co-Publication in Scientific Research: An Analysis at the Laboratory Level , 2005 .

[35]  David G. Mathiasen Groups that work (and those that Don't): Creating Conditions for Effective Teamwork, edited by J. Richard Hackman. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass 1990, 512 pp. Price: $39.95 cloth , 1991 .

[36]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Network Structure, Self-Organization and the Growth of International Collaboration in Science.Research Policy, 34(10), 2005, 1608-1618. , 2005, 0911.4299.

[37]  L. S. Kwok,et al.  The White Bull effect: abusive coauthorship and publication parasitism , 2005, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[38]  John Hudson,et al.  Trends in Multi-authored Papers in Economics , 1996 .

[39]  Richard K. Fleischman,et al.  Co-authorship in accounting history: advantages and pitfalls , 2009 .

[40]  Donald J. Schepker,et al.  The Many Futures of Contracts , 2014 .

[41]  Ranjay Gulati,et al.  Managing Network Resources: Alliances, Affiliations, and Other Relational Assets , 2007 .

[42]  Daniel A. McFarland,et al.  Ties That Last , 2013 .

[43]  Glenn M. Pfeiffer,et al.  Technology R&D alliances and firm value , 2001 .

[44]  David L. Kaserman,et al.  The Rising Incidence of Co-authorship in Economics: Further Evidence , 1988 .

[45]  Jay B. Barney,et al.  How entrepreneurial firms can benefit from alliances with large partners , 2001 .

[46]  Christiana E. Hilmer,et al.  How Do Journal Quality, Co‐Authorship, and Author Order Affect Agricultural Economists' Salaries? , 2005 .

[47]  J. McDowell,et al.  The Determinants of Co-Authorship: An Analysis of the Economics Literature , 1983 .

[48]  Rachelle C. Sampson Experience effects and collaborative returns in R&D alliances , 2005 .

[49]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S3 References the Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge , 2022 .

[50]  L. Zucker Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840–1920. , 1986 .

[51]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[52]  T. Khanna,et al.  Do Firms Learn to Create Value? The Case of Alliances , 2000 .

[53]  J. S. Katz,et al.  What is research collaboration , 1997 .

[54]  Raymond A. K. Cox,et al.  On the Relation Between Intellectual Collaboration and Intellectual Output: Evidence from the Finance Academe , 2009 .

[55]  Marcel Fafchamps,et al.  Scientific Networks and Co-authorship , 2006 .

[56]  Lorenzo Ductor Does Co‐Authorship Lead to Higher Academic Productivity? , 2015 .

[57]  Benjamin F. Jones Age and Great Invention , 2004 .

[58]  Venkatesh Shankar,et al.  Asymmetric New Product Development Alliances: Win-Win or Win-Lose Partnerships? , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[59]  Tomaso Duso,et al.  Learning dynamics in research alliances: A panel data analysis written , 2010 .

[60]  R. Gulati Does Familiarity Breed Trust? The Implications of Repeated Ties for Contractual Choice in Alliances , 1995 .

[61]  ann-charlotte Ståhlberg,et al.  Reaching the Top? On Gender Balance in the Economics Profession , 2008 .

[62]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Relational governance as an interorganizational strategy: An empirical test of the role of trust in economic exchange , 1995 .

[63]  H. Stumpf,et al.  Scientific creativity: A short overview , 1995 .

[64]  Arthur J. Keown,et al.  Do strategic alliances create value , 1997 .

[65]  Sanjeev Goyal,et al.  Social Networks and Research Output , 2014, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[66]  B. Martin What can bibliometrics tell us about changes in the mode of knowledge production? , 2011 .

[67]  Dan Johnson Getting Noticed in Economics: The Determinants of Academic Citations , 1997 .

[68]  Kevin L. Ross,et al.  An Analysis of the Determinants of Co-authorship in Economics , 1992 .

[69]  Raymond D. Sauer,et al.  Estimates of the Returns to Quality and Coauthorship in Economic Academia , 1988, Journal of Political Economy.

[70]  E. Penrose The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[71]  I. Steiner Group process and productivity , 1972 .