Study of LoRaWAN Technology for Activity Recognition

In this paper, we explore LoRaWAN (Long Range Wide Area Network) sensor for human activity recognition. In this research, we want to explore relation between packet loss and activity recognition accuracy from LoRaWAN sensor data. We want to estimate the packet loss amount from realistic sensors. In LoRaWAN technology, the amount of sensor nodes connected with a single gateway have an impact on the performance of sensors ultimate data sending capability in terms of packet loss. By exploring a single gateway, we transfer the LoRaWAN sensor data to the cloud platform successfully. We evaluate LoRaWAN accelerometer sensors data for human activity recognition. We explore the Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Random Forest (RnF) and K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) for classification. We achieve recognition accuracy of 94.44% by LDA, 84.72% by RnF and 98.61% by KNN. Then we simulate the packet loss environment in our dataset to explore the relation between packet loss and accuracy. In real caregiving center, we did experiment with 42 LoRaWAN sensors node connectivity and data transfer ability to evaluate the packet received and packet loss performance with LoRaWAN sensors.

[1]  Dmitry Bankov,et al.  Mathematical model of LoRaWAN channel access , 2017, 2017 IEEE 18th International Symposium on A World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM).

[2]  Zbyněk Kocur,et al.  Performance evaluation of IoT mesh networking technology in ISM frequency band , 2016, 2016 17th International Conference on Mechatronics - Mechatronika (ME).

[3]  Andrea Zanella,et al.  Long-range communications in unlicensed bands: the rising stars in the IoT and smart city scenarios , 2015, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[4]  Konstantin Mikhaylov,et al.  On the coverage of LPWANs: range evaluation and channel attenuation model for LoRa technology , 2015, 2015 14th International Conference on ITS Telecommunications (ITST).

[5]  Wael Guibène,et al.  Evaluation of LPWAN Technologies for Smart Cities: River Monitoring Use-Case , 2017, 2017 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference Workshops (WCNCW).

[6]  Md. Atiqur Rahman Ahad Computer Vision and Action Recognition - A Guide for Image Processing and Computer Vision Community for Action Understanding , 2011, Atlantis Ambient and Pervasive Intelligence.

[7]  Thomas H. Clausen,et al.  A Study of LoRa: Long Range & Low Power Networks for the Internet of Things , 2016, Sensors.

[8]  Wanglin Yan,et al.  Long-range wireless sensor networks for geo-location tracking: Design and evaluation , 2016, 2016 International Electronics Symposium (IES).

[9]  Julien Montavont,et al.  Indoor deployment of low-power wide area networks (LPWAN): A LoRaWAN case study , 2016, 2016 IEEE 12th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob).

[10]  Md. Atiqur Rahman Ahad,et al.  Motion History Images for Action Recognition and Understanding , 2012, SpringerBriefs in Computer Science.

[11]  Sozo Inoue,et al.  A Study on Sensor-based Activity Recognition Having Missing Data , 2018, 2018 Joint 7th International Conference on Informatics, Electronics & Vision (ICIEV) and 2018 2nd International Conference on Imaging, Vision & Pattern Recognition (icIVPR).

[12]  Evgeny Khorov,et al.  On the Limits of LoRaWAN Channel Access , 2016, 2016 International Conference on Engineering and Telecommunication (EnT).