Longitudinal Assessment of Urinary PCA3 for Predicting Prostate Cancer Grade Reclassification in Favorable Risk Men during Active Surveillance

Background:To assess the utility of urinary prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) as both a one-time and longitudinal measure in men on active surveillance (AS).Methods:The Johns Hopkins AS program monitors men with favorable-risk prostate cancer with serial PSA, digital rectal examination (DRE), prostate magnetic resonance imaging and prostate biopsy. Since 2007, post-DRE urinary specimens have also been routinely obtained. Men with multiple PCA3 measures obtained over ⩾3 years of monitoring were included. Utility of first PCA3 score (fPCA3), subsequent PCA3 (sPCA3) and change in PCA3 were assessed for prediction of Gleason grade reclassification (GR, Gleason score >6) during follow-up.Results:In total, 260 men met study criteria. Median time from enrollment to fPCA3 was 2 years (interquartile range (IQR) 1–3) and from fPCA3 to sPCA3 was 5 years (IQR 4–6). During median follow-up of 6 years (IQR 5–8), 28 men (11%) underwent GR. Men with GR had higher median fPCA3 (48.0 vs 24.5, P=0.007) and sPCA3 (63.5 vs 36.0, P=0.002) than those without GR, while longitudinal change in PCA3 did not differ by GR status (log-normalized rate 0.07 vs 0.06, P=0.53). In a multivariable model including age, risk classification and PSA density, fPCA3 remained significantly associated with GR (log(fPCA3) odds ratio=1.77, P=0.04).Conclusions:PCA3 scores obtained during AS were higher in men who underwent GR, but the rate of change in PCA3 over time did not differ by GR status. PCA3 was a significant predictor of GR in a multivariable model including conventional risk factors, suggesting that PCA3 provides incremental prognostic information in the AS setting.

[1]  A. Ruffion,et al.  PCA3 and PCA3-Based Nomograms Improve Diagnostic Accuracy in Patients Undergoing First Prostate Biopsy , 2013, International journal of molecular sciences.

[2]  Yair Lotan,et al.  Systematic review of complications of prostate biopsy. , 2013, European urology.

[3]  W. Isaacs,et al.  DD3: a new prostate-specific gene, highly overexpressed in prostate cancer. , 1999, Cancer research.

[4]  J. Ware,et al.  Random-effects models for longitudinal data. , 1982, Biometrics.

[5]  Javed Siddiqui,et al.  Urine TMPRSS2:ERG Plus PCA3 for Individualized Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment. , 2016, European urology.

[6]  Peng Huang,et al.  The PCA3 test for guiding repeat biopsy of prostate cancer and its cut-off score: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2014, Asian journal of andrology.

[7]  G. Andriole,et al.  PCA3 molecular urine test for predicting repeat prostate biopsy outcome in populations at risk: validation in the placebo arm of the dutasteride REDUCE trial. , 2010, The Journal of urology.

[8]  P. Walsh,et al.  Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancer. , 1994, JAMA.

[9]  A. Partin,et al.  Accuracy of PCA3 measurement in predicting short-term biopsy progression in an active surveillance program. , 2010, The Journal of urology.

[10]  K. Macura,et al.  The Role of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy in Active Surveillance. , 2017, European urology.

[11]  Misop Han,et al.  Predicting 15-year prostate cancer specific mortality after radical prostatectomy. , 2011, The Journal of urology.

[12]  B. Trock,et al.  Prostate specific antigen velocity risk count predicts biopsy reclassification for men with very low risk prostate cancer. , 2014, The Journal of urology.

[13]  John T. Wei,et al.  Urinary TMPRSS2:ERG and PCA3 in an Active Surveillance Cohort: Results from a Baseline Analysis in the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study , 2013, Clinical Cancer Research.

[14]  D. Hosmer,et al.  A comparison of goodness-of-fit tests for the logistic regression model. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.

[15]  A. Partin,et al.  Urinary Biomarkers for Prostate Cancer. , 2016, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[16]  Javed,et al.  Urine TMPRSS 2 : ERG Plus PCA 3 for Individualized Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment , 2016 .

[17]  H. Carter,et al.  Improving Prostate Cancer Screening and Diagnosis: Health Policy and Biomarkers Beyond PSA. , 2016, JAMA oncology.

[18]  J. Tosoian,et al.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: current evidence and contemporary state of practice , 2016, Nature Reviews Urology.

[19]  Yair Lotan,et al.  Can urinary PCA3 supplement PSA in the early detection of prostate cancer? , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  M. Kattan,et al.  1208 URINARY PCA 3 AS A PREDICTOR FOR PROSTATE CANCER IN A COHORT OF 1928 MEN UNDERGOING INITIAL PROSTATE BIOPSY , 2012 .

[21]  Javier Hernandez,et al.  External validation of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator in a screened population. , 2006, Urology.

[22]  M. Kattan,et al.  Urinary PCA3 as a predictor of prostate cancer in a cohort of 3,073 men undergoing initial prostate biopsy. , 2014, The Journal of urology.

[23]  J. Schalken,et al.  Preliminary evaluation of the effect of dutasteride on PCA3 in post‐DRE urine sediments: A randomized, open‐label, parallel‐group pilot study , 2009, The Prostate.