ba-Effect of the feed presentation form on the intake pattern, productive traits and rumen pH of beef cattle fed high concentrate diets

Nutritional disorders like ruminal acidosis are common in Spanish beef production system, in which animals are fed diets with a high content in starch. This experiment studied the effect of feed presentation form (concentrate and straw offered separately, CD, or mixed in form of briquettes, BR) on the pattern of intake, growth and rumen pH of beef cattle fed high concentrate diets. The experiment was performed with 40 Holstein male calves, 32 of them for determining feed intake pattern and productive rates, and the remaining 8, which were previously provided with a ruminal cannula, to monitor rumen pH in two 21-day consecutive periods following a change-over design. Animals fed BR reduced feed intake rate during the first hour after feeding (18.6 vs. 24.0% of daily intake p < 0.001), but this diet promoted a lower rumen pH at all sampling times compared with CD (daily average of 5.98 vs. 6.33; p < 0.001) and tended to promote a lower total feed intake (7.08 vs. 9.77 kg DM d –1 ; p < 0.001) and daily weight gain (1.43 vs. 1.76 kg d –1 ; p = 0.056). Offering the concentrate and the straw mixed in form of briquettes is not useful to prevent ruminal acidosis and improve growth, probably due to both a reduced particle size of straw and avoided self-regulation of straw intake along the day.

[1]  K. Schwartzkopf-Genswein,et al.  Ruminal acidosis in feedlot cattle: Interplay between feed ingredients, rumen function and feeding behavior (a review) , 2012 .

[2]  K. Schwartzkopf-Genswein,et al.  Feeding behavior and ruminal acidosis in beef cattle offered a total mixed ration or dietary components separately. , 2011, Journal of animal science.

[3]  T. Nagaraja,et al.  Ruminal acidosis in beef cattle: the current microbiological and nutritional outlook. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[4]  M. Brown,et al.  Adaptation of beef cattle to high-concentrate diets: performance and ruminal metabolism. , 2006, Journal of animal science.

[5]  G. Oetzel,et al.  Understanding and preventing subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy herds: A review , 2006 .

[6]  A. D. Kennedy,et al.  Effect of feed delivery fluctuations and feeding time on ruminal acidosis, growth performance, and feeding behavior of feedlot cattle. , 2004, Journal of animal science.

[7]  D. Mertens Creating a system for meeting the fiber requirements of dairy cows. , 1997, Journal of dairy science.

[8]  F. Owens,et al.  The effect of grain source and grain processing on performance of feedlot cattle: a review. , 1997, Journal of animal science.

[9]  I. Kyriazakis,et al.  The effects of physical form of feed, carbohydrate source, and inclusion of sodium bicarbonate on the diet selections of sheep. , 1996, Journal of animal science.

[10]  A. Pokrovskii [Nutrition and disease]. , 1978, Voprosy pitaniia.

[11]  D. Mertens Measuring fiber and its effectiveness in ruminant diets , 2002 .

[12]  L. Tedeschi,et al.  Application of Physically Effective Fiber in Diets for Feedlot Cattle , 2002 .

[13]  F. Owens,et al.  Acidosis in cattle: a review. , 1998, Journal of animal science.

[14]  W. Stroup,et al.  Effect of monensin and monensin and tylosin combination on feed intake variation of feedlot steers. , 1995, Journal of animal science.

[15]  L. G. Ensminger The Association of Official Analytical Chemists , 1976 .

[16]  J. Clegg,et al.  Gravimetric Determination of Amylase-Treated Neutral Detergent Fiber in Feeds with Refluxing in Beakers or Crucibles : Collaborative Study , 2022 .