Quantifying impacts of product return uncertainty on economic and environmental performances of product configuration design

Abstract The product returns involve considerable uncertainties that have an impact on the economic (i.e., total cost) and environmental (i.e., global warming potential, water use and energy use) performance measures of a product configuration design. This is because it directly affects the number of reusable, remanufacturable and/or recyclable components/items. However, impact of the uncertainty of product return rate on the economic and environmental performance of new product configuration designs has not been addressed in literature. In this study, a methodology is proposed to quantify the impact of product return rate uncertainty using Monte Carlo simulation. The proposed methodology is implemented on an industrial case study for quantifying the impact of product return rate uncertainty on the economic and environmental performance of toner cartridge configuration designs. The results of this study can provide useful information on the variation of total lifecycle cost, global warming potential, total water use, and total energy use of product configuration designs due to the uncertainty of product return rate.

[1]  Harrison Hyung Min Kim,et al.  Assessing product family design from an end-of-life perspective , 2011 .

[2]  C. K. Kwong,et al.  Coordination of the closed-loop supply chain for product line design with consideration of remanufactured products , 2016 .

[3]  Thorsten Wuest,et al.  Cascade Use and the Management of Product Lifecycles , 2017 .

[4]  Fazleena Badurdeen,et al.  Strategies for Value Creation Through Sustainable Manufacturing , 2017 .

[5]  Kannan Govindan,et al.  Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain: A comprehensive review to explore the future , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  M. Jakiela,et al.  A cost model for optimizing the take back phase of used product recovery , 2011 .

[7]  Harrison Hyung Min Kim,et al.  Design for life-cycle profit with simultaneous consideration of initial manufacturing and end-of-life remanufacturing , 2013 .

[8]  Taebok Kim,et al.  Determination of the optimal production policy and product recovery policy: The impacts of sales margin of recovered product , 2011 .

[9]  Dzuraidah Abd. Wahab,et al.  Multiple generation life-cycles for product sustainability: the way forward , 2015 .

[10]  James F. C. Windmill,et al.  Integrating design for remanufacture into the design process: the operational factors , 2013 .

[11]  Dimitris Kiritsis,et al.  A multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for EOL product recovery optimization: turbocharger case study , 2007 .

[12]  Gilvan C. Souza,et al.  Multiperiod Remanufacturing Planning With Uncertain Quality of Inputs , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[13]  Hokey Min,et al.  A genetic algorithm approach to developing the multi-echelon reverse logistics network for product returns , 2006 .

[14]  Rafael Diaz,et al.  Evaluating strategic remanufacturing supply chain decisions , 2017, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[15]  Elif Akçali,et al.  Quantitative models for inventory and production planning in closed-loop supply chains , 2011 .

[16]  Tzu-Chun Weng,et al.  Optimal replenishment quantity for new products and return rate of used products for a retailer , 2016 .

[17]  Ming-Lung Hung,et al.  Quantifying system uncertainty of life cycle assessment based on Monte Carlo simulation , 2008 .

[18]  Subhash C. Sarin,et al.  Joint-advertising for collection of returned products in a closed-loop supply chain under uncertain environment , 2017, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[19]  Behzad Esmaeilian,et al.  Uncertainty Management in Remanufacturing Decisions: A Consideration of Uncertainties in Market Demand, Quantity, and Quality of Returns , 2015 .

[20]  O. W. Dillon,et al.  TOTAL LIFE-CYCLE CONSIDERATIONS IN PRODUCT DESIGN FOR SUSTAINABILITY : A FRAMEWORK FOR COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION , 2006 .

[21]  Ali M. Niknejad,et al.  Optimisation of integrated reverse logistics networks with different product recovery routes , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[22]  Harrison Hyung Min Kim,et al.  Predictive Model Selection for Forecasting Product Returns , 2016 .

[23]  S. Vinodh,et al.  Application of life cycle assessment and Monte Carlo simulation for enabling sustainable product design , 2014 .

[24]  Paolo Rosa,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment Tool in Product Development: Environmental Requirements in Decision Making Process , 2016 .

[25]  G. Guillén‐Gosálbez,et al.  Combined use of life cycle assessment, data envelopment analysis and Monte Carlo simulation for quantifying environmental efficiencies under uncertainty , 2017 .

[26]  L. Wein,et al.  Inventory Management of Remanufacturable Products , 2000 .

[27]  Guoqing Zhang,et al.  Optimal production planning for a multi-product closed loop system with uncertain demand and return , 2011, Comput. Oper. Res..

[28]  Augusto Q. Novais,et al.  Addressing the uncertain quality and quantity of returns in closed-loop supply chains , 2012, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[29]  C. K. Kwong,et al.  Determining the optimal quantity and quality levels of used product returns for remanufacturing under multi-period and uncertain quality of returns , 2018 .

[30]  James F. C. Windmill,et al.  Design for remanufacture: a literature review and future research needs , 2011 .

[31]  Donna Mangun,et al.  Incorporating component reuse, remanufacture, and recycle into product portfolio design , 2002, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[32]  Chun-Hsien Chen,et al.  Review of life cycle assessment towards sustainable product development , 2014 .

[33]  Shang-Lien Lo,et al.  Quantifying and reducing uncertainty in life cycle assessment using the Bayesian Monte Carlo method. , 2005, The Science of the total environment.