Biodiversity Sampling Using a Global Acoustic Approach: Contrasting Sites with Microendemics in New Caledonia

New Caledonia is a Pacific island with a unique biodiversity showing an extreme microendemism. Many species distributions observed on this island are extremely restricted, localized to mountains or rivers making biodiversity evaluation and conservation a difficult task. A rapid biodiversity assessment method based on acoustics was recently proposed. This method could help to document the unique spatial structure observed in New Caledonia. Here, this method was applied in an attempt to reveal differences among three mountain sites (Mandjélia, Koghis and Aoupinié) with similar ecological features and species richness level, but with high beta diversity according to different microendemic assemblages. In each site, several local acoustic communities were sampled with audio recorders. An automatic acoustic sampling was run on these three sites for a period of 82 successive days. Acoustic properties of animal communities were analysed without any species identification. A frequency spectral complexity index (NP) was used as an estimate of the level of acoustic activity and a frequency spectral dissimilarity index (Df) assessed acoustic differences between pairs of recordings. As expected, the index NP did not reveal significant differences in the acoustic activity level between the three sites. However, the acoustic variability estimated by the index Df, could first be explained by changes in the acoustic communities along the 24-hour cycle and second by acoustic dissimilarities between the three sites. The results support the hypothesis that global acoustic analyses can detect acoustic differences between sites with similar species richness and similar ecological context, but with different species assemblages. This study also demonstrates that global acoustic methods applied at broad spatial and temporal scales could help to assess local biodiversity in the challenging context of microendemism. The method could be deployed over large areas, and could help to compare different sites and determine conservation priorities.

[1]  Porter P. Lowry,et al.  Threats to the conifer species found on New Caledonia’s ultramafic massifs and proposals for urgently needed measures to improve their protection , 2010, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[2]  Almo Farina,et al.  A new methodology to infer the singing activity of an avian community: The Acoustic Complexity Index (ACI) , 2011 .

[3]  T. Robillard,et al.  Phylogenetic systematics and evolution of Agnotecous in New Caledonia (Orthoptera: Grylloidea, Eneopteridae) , 2005 .

[4]  Andrew Mason.  Insect Sounds and Communication: Physiology, Behaviour, Ecology and Evolution , 2009 .

[5]  J. Munzinger,et al.  Ultramafic soils and species sorting in the flora of New Caledonia , 2010 .

[6]  G. Niemi,et al.  Community Ecology , 2013 .

[7]  J. Gower.  Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis , 1966 .

[8]  D. Chessel,et al.  From dissimilarities among species to dissimilarities among communities: a double principal coordinate analysis. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[9]  J. Muriennea,et al.  Phylogenetic analysis of the endemic New Caledonian cockroach Lauraesilpha . Testing competing hypotheses of diversification , 2008 .

[10]  Murray G. Efford,et al.  Bird population density estimated from acoustic signals , 2009 .

[11]  Anne-Béatrice Dufour,et al.  The ade4 Package: Implementing the Duality Diagram for Ecologists , 2007 .

[12]  Sandrine Pavoine,et al.  Rapid Acoustic Survey for Biodiversity Appraisal , 2008, PloS one.

[13]  Pierre Legendre,et al.  DISTANCE‐BASED REDUNDANCY ANALYSIS: TESTING MULTISPECIES RESPONSES IN MULTIFACTORIAL ECOLOGICAL EXPERIMENTS , 1999 .

[14]  Sandrine Pavoine,et al.  Author's Personal Copy Ecological Indicators Monitoring Animal Diversity Using Acoustic Indices: Implementation in a Temperate Woodland , 2022 .

[15]  Eric Guilbert,et al.  Species' diversity in the New Caledonian endemic genera Cephalidiosus and Nobarnus (Insecta: Heteroptera: Tingidae), an approach using phylogeny and species' distribution modelling , 2009 .

[16]  Sandrine Pavoine,et al.  Global estimation of animal diversity using automatic acoustic sensors , 2012 .

[17]  P. Grandcolas,et al.  New Caledonia: a very old Darwinian island? , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  D. Helversen,et al.  Calling behavior in bushcrickets of the genusPoecilimon with differing communication systems (Orthoptera: Tettigonioidea, Phaneropteridae) , 1993, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[19]  M. Espeland,et al.  The effect of environmental diversification on species diversification in New Caledonian caddisflies (Insecta: Trichoptera: Hydropsychidae) , 2010 .

[20]  Paul Roe,et al.  Analysing environmental acoustic data through collaboration and automation , 2013, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[21]  James N. Burch,et al.  Biogeography. An Ecological and Evolutionary Approach , 1994, Economic Botany.

[22]  N. Han,et al.  Acoustic classification of Australian anurans based on hybrid spectral-entropy approach , 2011 .

[23]  Paul Roe,et al.  A toolbox for animal call recognition , 2012 .

[24]  G. Boncoraglio,et al.  Habitat structure and the evolution of bird song: a meta-analysis of the evidence for the acoustic adaptation hypothesis , 2007 .

[25]  R. W. Ficken,et al.  Avoidance of acoustic interference by Ovenbirds , 1985 .

[26]  W. Barthlott,et al.  A global assessment of endemism and species richness across island and mainland regions , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Luis J. Villanueva-Rivera,et al.  Soundscape Ecology: The Science of Sound in the Landscape , 2011 .

[28]  T. Scott Brandes,et al.  Automated sound recording and analysis techniques for bird surveys and conservation , 2008, Bird Conservation International.

[29]  K. Henwood,et al.  A Quantitative Analysis of the Dawn Chorus: Temporal Selection for Communicatory Optimization , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[30]  A. Couloux,et al.  Secondary Sympatry Caused by Range Expansion Informs on the Dynamics of Microendemism in a Biodiversity Hotspot , 2012, PloS one.

[31]  Luis J. Villanueva-Rivera,et al.  Using Automated Digital Recording Systems as Effective Tools for the Monitoring of Birds and Amphibians , 2006 .

[32]  P. Walker,et al.  How do indicator groups provide information about the relative biodiversity of different sets of areas?: on hotspots, complementarity and pattern-based approaches , 1996 .

[33]  J. Fischer,et al.  THE “ACOUSTIC ADAPTATION HYPOTHESIS”—A REVIEW OF THE EVIDENCE FROM BIRDS, ANURANS AND MAMMALS , 2009 .

[34]  Thierry Aubin,et al.  SEEWAVE, A FREE MODULAR TOOL FOR SOUND ANALYSIS AND SYNTHESIS , 2008 .

[35]  Sakis Drosopoulos,et al.  Insect sounds and communication : physiology, behaviour, ecology and evolution , 2006 .

[36]  J. Lingoes.  Some boundary conditions for a monotone analysis of symmetric matrices , 1971 .

[37]  S. Sarkar,et al.  Systematic conservation planning , 2000, Nature.

[38]  Héctor Corrada Bravo,et al.  Automated classification of bird and amphibian calls using machine learning: A comparison of methods , 2009, Ecol. Informatics.

[39]  R. Mittermeier,et al.  Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities , 2000, Nature.

[40]  F. Coleman,et al.  Goliath grouper Epinephelus itajara sound production and movement patterns on aggregation sites , 2009 .

[41]  Calyampudi R. Rao.  Diversity and dissimilarity coefficients: A unified approach☆ , 1982 .

[42]  A. Couloux,et al.  Older than New Caledonia emergence? A molecular phylogenetic study of the eneopterine crickets (Orthoptera: Grylloidea) , 2011 .

[43]  Sandrine Pavoine,et al.  Assessing biodiversity with sound: Do acoustic diversity indices reflect phylogenetic and functional diversities of bird communities? , 2013 .

[44]  T. Robillard,et al.  New species of the New Caledonian endemic genus Agnotecous (Orthoptera, Grylloidea, Eneopterinae, Lebinthini) , 2010 .