Willingness to pay for safe drinking water: Evidence from Parral, Mexico.

A referendum-format contingent valuation (CV) survey is used to elicit household willingness to pay responses for safe and reliable drinking water in Parral, Mexico. Households currently adopt a variety of averting and private investment choices (e.g., bottled water consumption, home-based water treatment, and installation of water storage facilities) to adapt to the existing water supply system. These revealed behaviors indicate the latent demand for safer and more reliable water services, which is corroborated by the CV survey evidence. Validity findings include significant scope sensitivity in WTP for water services. Further, results indicate that households are willing to pay from 1.8% to 7.55% of reported household income above their current water bill for safe and reliable drinking water services, depending upon the assumptions about response uncertainty.

[1]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  Learning design contingent valuation (LDCV): NOAA guidelines, preference learning and coherent arbitrariness , 2008 .

[2]  Magnus Johannesson,et al.  Eliciting Willingness to Pay Without Bias: Evidence from a Field Experiment , 2008 .

[3]  Robert P. Berrens,et al.  Contingent values for New Mexico instream flows : With tests of scope, group-size reminder and temporal reliability , 2000 .

[4]  N. Bockstael,et al.  THE BEHAVIORAL BASIS OF NON-MARKET VALUATION , 2002 .

[5]  Margarita Genius,et al.  Water shortages and implied water quality: A contingent valuation study , 2006 .

[6]  Sylvestre Gaudin,et al.  Effect of price information on residential water demand , 2006 .

[7]  Ricardo Fuentes,et al.  Human Development Report 2006 , 2006 .

[8]  Robert P. Berrens,et al.  Examining the Role of Social Isolation on Stated Preferences , 2004 .

[9]  A. Gadgil.  Drinking water in developing countries , 1998 .

[10]  I. Bateman,et al.  Scope sensitivity in households' willingness to pay for maintained and improved water supplies in a developing world urban area: Investigating the influence of baseline supply quality and income distribution upon stated preferences in Mexico City , 2006 .

[11]  Robert M. Clark,et al.  Safe drinking water from small systems : treatment options , 1992 .

[12]  Richard T. Carson,et al.  Incentive and informational properties of preference questions , 2007 .

[13]  J. Mjelde,et al.  Valuing Water Supply Reliability , 2000 .

[14]  C. Abdalla,et al.  Valuing Environmental Quality Changes Using Averting Expenditures: An Application to Groundwater Contamination , 1990 .

[15]  Pei-Ing Wu,et al.  Actual averting expenditure versus stated willingness to pay , 2001 .

[16]  Robert P. Berrens,et al.  Information and effort in contingent valuation surveys: application to global climate change using national internet samples ☆ , 2004 .

[17]  David Barkin,et al.  Water management strategies in urban Mexico: Limitations of the privatization debate , 2006 .

[18]  Joe Kerkvliet,et al.  A Randomized Response Approach to Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation , 1997 .

[19]  Richard C. Bishop,et al.  Using Donation Mechanisms to Value Nonuse Benefits from Public Goods , 1997 .

[20]  B. Hubbell,et al.  Joint Production and Averting Expenditure Measures of Willingness to Pay: Do Water Expenditures Really Measure Avoidance Costs? , 2000 .

[21]  Banco Mundial.  The demand for water in rural areas: determinants and policy implications. , 1993, The World Bank research observer.

[22]  L Villalba,et al.  Radon concentrations in ground and drinking water in the state of Chihuahua, Mexico. , 2005, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[23]  J. Herriges,et al.  Valuing Recreation and the Environment: Revealed Preference Methods in Theory and Practice, New Horizons in Environmental Economics , 1999 .

[24]  Luis C. Nunes,et al.  Combining Averting Behavior and Contingent Valuation Data: An Application to Drinking Water Treatment , 2000 .

[25]  Robert M. Hamm,et al.  The Value of Water Supply Reliability in Urban Water Systems , 1994 .

[26]  Robert P. Berrens,et al.  Explaining Disparities between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values: Further Investigation Using Meta-Analysis , 2004 .

[27]  Dale Whittington,et al.  A study of water vending and willingness to pay for water in Onitsha, Nigeria , 1989 .

[28]  Dale Whittington,et al.  Administering contingent valuation surveys in developing countries , 1996 .

[29]  John B. Loomis,et al.  Computational Methods for Measuring the Difference of Empirical Distributions , 2005 .

[30]  L. Nunes,et al.  Combining averting behavior and contingent valuation data: an application to drinking water treatment in Brazil , 2006, Environment and Development Economics.

[31]  Christian A. Vossler,et al.  Payment Certainty in Discrete Choice Contingent Valuation Responses: Results from a Field Validity Test , 2003 .

[32]  Richard C. Bishop,et al.  Donation Payment Mechanisms and Contingent Valuation: An Empirical Study of Hypothetical Bias , 2001 .

[33]  Kevin J. Boyle,et al.  Contingent Valuation in Practice , 2003 .

[34]  J. Whitehead.  Willingness to pay for quality improvements: comparative statics and interpretation of contingent valuation results. , 1995 .

[35]  James J. Murphy,et al.  A Meta-analysis of Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Valuation , 2003 .

[36]  Catherine Ferrier,et al.  Bottled Water: Understanding a Social Phenomenon , 2001 .

[37]  F. Carlsson,et al.  Preferences with and without prices - does the price attribute affect behavior in stated preference surveys? , 2007 .

[38]  I. Krinsky,et al.  On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities , 1986 .

[39]  Robert P. Berrens,et al.  Public support for reducing US reliance on fossil fuels: Investigating household willingness-to-pay for energy research and development , 2009 .

[40]  R. Carson,et al.  Sequencing and Nesting in Contingent Valuation Surveys , 1995 .

[41]  Dale Whittington,et al.  Coping with unreliable public water supplies: Averting expenditures by households in Kathmandu, Nepal , 2005 .

[42]  Thomas C. Brown,et al.  A primer on nonmarket valuation , 2003 .

[43]  Dale Whittington,et al.  Estimating the Willingness to Pay for Water Services in Developing Countries: A Case Study of the Use of Contingent Valuation Surveys in Southern Haiti , 1990, Economic Development and Cultural Change.

[44]  John A. List,et al.  What Experimental Protocol Influence Disparities Between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values? , 2001 .

[45]  Alejandro Caparrós,et al.  Would You Choose Your Preferred Option? Comparing Choice and Recoded Ranking Experiments , 2007 .

[46]  Robert P. Berrens,et al.  Further Investigation of Voluntary Contribution Contingent Valuation: Fair Share, Time of Contribution, and Respondent Uncertainty , 2002 .

[47]  Trudy Ann Cameron,et al.  A New Paradigm for Valuing Non-market Goods Using Referendum Data: Maximum Likelihood Estimation by Censored Logistic Regression' , 1988 .

[48]  Dale Whittington,et al.  Improving the Performance of Contingent Valuation Studies in Developing Countries , 2002 .