In a competitive energy market, instead of, or in addition to, a centralized unit commitment, individual generation owners will make independent unit commitment decisions. They will seek to maximize their profits against the predicted market clearing price. Their unit commitment strategy will be expressed in their bids, so that they shut-down or start-up when the market price indicates such activity. In this chapter, we develop a unit commitment based price-taking (UCPT) bidding strategy with a simple price prediction mechanism and explore it using a market simulator. Simulation results show that an individual generator has higher profits with UCPT bidding than with simple price-taking bidding, and that the cost of supplying price-inelastic loads achieved by the market is lower when all generators use UCPT bidding. It appears that UCPT bidding gives results similar to those from a Lagrangian relaxation unit commitment (LRUC), without a fix-up step, and it has problems with convergence and feasibility similar to LRUC. We observe cyclic behavior in market prices with UCPT bidding, and we show that it depends on the price prediction mechanism. Alternative price prediction mechanisms can reduce cyclic behavior. Finally, we conceptually explore potential strategic behavior and market power arising from unit commitment constraints.
[1]
Philip G. Hill,et al.
Power generation
,
1927,
Journal of the A.I.E.E..
[2]
John R. Birge,et al.
A stochastic model for the unit commitment problem
,
1996
.
[3]
G. Sheblé,et al.
Power generation operation and control — 2nd edition
,
1996
.
[4]
Shmuel S. Oren,et al.
Volatility of unit commitment in competitive electricity markets
,
1997,
Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
[5]
Malcolm Irving,et al.
Large scale unit commitment using a hybrid genetic algorithm
,
1997
.
[6]
J. J. Ancona,et al.
A bid solicitation and selection method for developing a competitive spot priced electric market
,
1997
.
[7]
I. Wangensteen,et al.
Thermal power generation scheduling by simulated competition
,
1999
.
[8]
A. J. Svoboda,et al.
Revenue adequate bidding strategies in competitive electricity markets
,
1999
.