Wireless, soft electronics for rapid, multisensor measurements of hydration levels in healthy and diseased skin

Significance Wireless electronics for monitoring of skin hydration in a quantitative fashion have broad relevance to our understanding of dermatological health and skin structure in both clinical and home settings. Here, we present a miniaturized, long-range automated system that adheres gently to the skin to yield quantitative recordings of skin water content for both epidermis and dermis. This system supports capabilities in characterizing skin barrier, assessing severity of skin diseases, and evaluating cosmetic and medication efficacy, with high levels of repeatability and insensitivity to ambient. Benchtop and pilot studies on patients with skin diseases highlight key features of these devices and their potential for broad utility in clinical research and in home settings to guide the management of disorders of the skin. Precise, quantitative measurements of the hydration status of skin can yield important insights into dermatological health and skin structure and function, with additional relevance to essential processes of thermoregulation and other features of basic physiology. Existing tools for determining skin water content exploit surrogate electrical assessments performed with bulky, rigid, and expensive instruments that are difficult to use in a repeatable manner. Recent alternatives exploit thermal measurements using soft wireless devices that adhere gently and noninvasively to the surface of the skin, but with limited operating range (∼1 cm) and high sensitivity to subtle environmental fluctuations. This paper introduces a set of ideas and technologies that overcome these drawbacks to enable high-speed, robust, long-range automated measurements of thermal transport properties via a miniaturized, multisensor module controlled by a long-range (∼10 m) Bluetooth Low Energy system on a chip, with a graphical user interface to standard smartphones. Soft contact to the surface of the skin, with almost zero user burden, yields recordings that can be quantitatively connected to hydration levels of both the epidermis and dermis, using computational modeling techniques, with high levels of repeatability and insensitivity to ambient fluctuations in temperature. Systematic studies of polymers in layered configurations similar to those of human skin, of porcine skin with known levels of hydration, and of human subjects with benchmarks against clinical devices validate the measurement approach and associated sensor hardware. The results support capabilities in characterizing skin barrier function, assessing severity of skin diseases, and evaluating cosmetic and medication efficacy, for use in the clinic or in the home.

[1]  T. Shiohara,et al.  Sweat as an Efficient Natural Moisturizer. , 2016, Current problems in dermatology.

[2]  R. C. Macridis A review , 1963 .

[3]  A. Basehoar,et al.  Comparison of closed chamber and open chamber evaporimetry , 2009, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[4]  P. Kyriacou,et al.  Review of Modern Techniques for the Assessment of Skin Hydration , 2019, Cosmetics.

[5]  L. DeSanti Pathophysiology and current management of burn injury. , 2005, Advances in skin & wound care.

[6]  Ernst Behrens,et al.  Thermal Conductivities of Composite Materials , 1968 .

[7]  John A. Rogers,et al.  Advanced approaches for quantitative characterization of thermal transport properties in soft materials using thin, conformable resistive sensors , 2018, Extreme Mechanics Letters.

[8]  M. Burg,et al.  Increased Insensible Water Loss Contributes to Aging Related Dehydration , 2011, PloS one.

[9]  Jesper Bo Nielsen,et al.  Absorption of chemicals through compromised skin , 2009, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[10]  T. Cortázar,et al.  Water content at different skin depths and the influence of moisturizing formulations , 2016 .

[11]  S. Nutten Atopic Dermatitis: Global Epidemiology and Risk Factors , 2015, Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism.

[12]  Vera Rogiers,et al.  EEMCO Guidance for the Assessment of Transepidermal Water Loss in Cosmetic Sciences , 2001, Skin Pharmacology and Physiology.

[13]  Takashi Sasaki,et al.  Transepidermal water loss measurement during infancy can predict the subsequent development of atopic dermatitis regardless of filaggrin mutations. , 2016, Allergology international : official journal of the Japanese Society of Allergology.

[14]  Russell S. Peak,et al.  Part 2: , 2020, Journal of Neural Transmission.

[15]  T. Agner,et al.  Tape Stripping Technique for Stratum Corneum Protein Analysis , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[16]  A. Irvine,et al.  Skin barrier dysfunction measured by transepidermal water loss at 2 days and 2 months predates and predicts atopic dermatitis at 1 year , 2015, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[17]  Aleksandr Stefaniak,et al.  International guidelines for the in vivo assessment of skin properties in non‐clinical settings: Part 2. transepidermal water loss and skin hydration , 2013, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[18]  Pedagógia,et al.  Cross Sectional Study , 2019 .

[19]  J. Fluhr,et al.  Non-invasive in vivo methods for investigation of the skin barrier physical properties. , 2009, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[20]  J. Okajima,et al.  First-in-human clinical study of novel technique to diagnose malignant melanoma via thermal conductivity measurements , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[21]  R. Danarti,et al.  The Role of Moisturizers in Addressing Various Kinds of Dermatitis: A Review , 2017, Clinical Medicine & Research.

[22]  S. Gustafsson Transient plane source techniques for thermal conductivity and thermal diffusivity measurements of solid materials , 1991 .

[23]  K. Grice,et al.  Transepidermal water loss. , 1968, British medical journal.

[24]  G. Adami,et al.  In vitro absorption of metal powders through intact and damaged human skin. , 2009, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[25]  John A. Rogers,et al.  Epidermal Electronic Systems for Measuring the Thermal Properties of Human Skin at Depths of up to Several Millimeters , 2018, Advanced Functional Materials.

[26]  T. Shiohara,et al.  Sweat is a most efficient natural moisturizer providing protective immunity at points of allergen entry. , 2018, Allergology international : official journal of the Japanese Society of Allergology.

[27]  Yonggang Huang,et al.  Multimodal epidermal devices for hydration monitoring , 2017, Microsystems & Nanoengineering.

[28]  A. Stroux,et al.  Noninvasive monitoring of plant-based formulations on skin barrier properties in infants with dry skin and risk for atopic dermatitis☆☆☆ , 2018, International journal of women's dermatology.

[29]  M. Ikram,et al.  'Prevalence and determinants for xerosis cutis in the middle-aged and elderly population: a cross-sectional study'. , 2019, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[30]  Ha Uk Chung,et al.  Reliable, low-cost, fully integrated hydration sensors for monitoring and diagnosis of inflammatory skin diseases in any environment , 2020, Science Advances.

[31]  T. Agner,et al.  Guidelines for transepidermal water loss (TEWL) measurement , 1990, Contact dermatitis.