Aided Perception of /s/ and /z/ by Hearing-Impaired Children

Objective The overall goal of this study was to determine the accuracy with which hearing-impaired children can detect the inflectional morphemes /s/ and /z/ when listening to speech through hearing aids. Design In the first part of the study a perceptual test was developed with equal numbers of singular and plural nouns spoken by both a male and female talker. Thirty-six normal-hearing children (3 to 5 yr) were tested to determine the age at which children could perform this test without difficulty. In the second part of the study, 40 children with bilateral sensorineural hearing losses (5 to 13 yr) were tested while wearing personal hearing aids. Stimuli were presented in the sound field at 65 dB SPL. Results For the normal-hearing children, mean performance increased and inter-subject variability decreased through age 5 yr 3 mo when performance reached ≥90% for all children. No significant talker or form (plural versus singular) effects were noted for this group. For the hearing-impaired children, performance varied considerably across all ages. For these subjects, significant effects of talker and form were observed. Specifically, plural test items spoken by the female talker showed the highest error rate. Conclusions In general, mid-frequency audibility (2 to 4 kHz) appeared to be most important for perception of the fricative noise for the male talker while a somewhat wider frequency range (2 to 8 kHz) was important for the female talker.

[1]  A Boothroyd,et al.  Spectral distribution of /s/ and the frequency response of hearing aids. , 1992, Ear and hearing.

[2]  P. Stelmachowicz,et al.  Effect of stimulus bandwidth on the perception of /s/ in normal- and hearing-impaired children and adults. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  R. Parker,et al.  Children with Minimal Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Prevalence, Educational Performance, and Functional Status , 1998, Ear and hearing.

[4]  E D Schubert,et al.  Consonant phonemic errors associated with pure-tone configurations and certain kinds of hearing impairment. , 1972, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[5]  D Byrne,et al.  Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  R. S. McGowan,et al.  The emergence of phonetic segments: evidence from the spectral structure of fricative-vowel syllables spoken by children and adults. , 1989, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[7]  F. Rudmin The Why and How of Hearing /s/. , 1983 .

[8]  P. Denes,et al.  On the statistics of spoken English , 1962 .

[9]  A. Boothroyd,et al.  The Hearing Aid Input: A Phonemic Approach to Assessing the Spectral Distribution of Speech , 1994, Ear and hearing.

[10]  C. Turner,et al.  High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Jon F. Miller,et al.  Assessing language production in children , 1980 .

[12]  R. Schwartz,et al.  A preliminary account of phonological and morphophonological perception in young children with and without otitis media. , 2001, International journal of language & communication disorders.

[13]  Relative Occurrence of Phonemes in American English , 1959 .

[14]  R C Bilger,et al.  Consonant confusions in patients with sensorineural hearing loss. , 1972, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[15]  R. Rush,et al.  The vocabulary of first-grade children , 1982 .

[16]  Jill de Villiers,et al.  Development of the use of word order in comprehension , 1973 .

[17]  C V Pavlovic,et al.  Transfer functions and correction factors used in hearing aid evaluation and research. , 1989, Ear and hearing.

[18]  T Lunner,et al.  System identification of feedback in hearing aids. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  A. Markides The speech of deaf and partially-hearing children with special reference to factors affecting intelligibility. , 1970, The British journal of disorders of communication.

[20]  C V Pavlovic,et al.  Frequency importance functions for a feature recognition test material. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  D D Dirks,et al.  Evaluation of hearing-impaired listeners using a Nonsense-Syllable Test. I. Test reliability. , 1982, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[22]  R A Bentler,et al.  Effects of mild and moderate hearing impairments on language, educational, and psychosocial behavior of children. , 1986, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[23]  P G Stelmachowicz,et al.  Bandwidth effects on children's perception of the inflectional morpheme /s/: acoustical measurements, auditory detection, and clarity rating. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[24]  E. Owens Consonant errors and remediation in sensorineural hearing loss. , 1978, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[25]  Richard C. Seewald,et al.  Procedure for Predicting Real-Ear Hearing Aid Performance in Young Children , 1994 .

[26]  P. Menyuk,et al.  Otitis media in infancy and intellectual ability, school achievement, speech, and language at age 7 years. Greater Boston Otitis Media Study Group. , 1990, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[27]  A. Markides The speech of hearing-impaired children , 1983 .

[28]  M. Hardin-Jones,et al.  Oral communication skills of children who are hard of hearing. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[29]  N. Shepard,et al.  Characteristics of hearing-impaired children in the public schools: part II--psychoeducational data. , 1981, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.