Efficacy of endoport-guided endoscopic resection for deep-seated brain lesions

Surgery for deep-seated brain lesions without causing significant trauma to the overlying cortex is difficult because brain retraction is required to approach these lesions. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of endoport-guided endoscopic or microscopic removal for deep-seated lesions using the neuronavigation system. Between October 2008 and December 2009, 21 patients (17 men and 4 women; average age, 40.8 years) underwent endoport-guided endoscopic tumor removal. We adapted the transparent tubular conduit, so-called “endoport,” to target the lesions under the guidance of neuronavigation. We then determined the efficacy and limitations of this technique with fully endoscopic removal, compared with standard approaches using a spatula retractor. Gross total resection of the lesions was achieved in 14 of 21 patients (66%), and partial removal occurred in four (19%) patients. However, there was failure to remove the lesion through the endoport in three patients (14.3%), requiring the use of blade spatula retractors. In reviewing the seven cases with either failure or partial removal, it was found that a large tumor size (≥3 cm) and calcified lesions were the major factors limiting the application of this technique. Endoport-guided endoscopic surgery facilitated an accurate and minimally invasive technique for removal of these deep-seated brain lesions. This procedure required a protracted learning curve although, when successful, this approach can minimize brain retraction and provide satisfactory visualization.

[1]  H. Schroeder,et al.  Endoscopic Resection of Colloid Cysts , 2002, Neurosurgery.

[2]  A. Rhoton,et al.  Microsurgery of the third ventricle: Part I. Microsurgical anatomy. , 1981, Neurosurgery.

[3]  Lokendra Singh,et al.  Cylindrical channel retractor for intraventricular tumour surgery—a simple and inexpensive device , 2009, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[4]  A. Rhoton,et al.  Microsurgery of the third ventricle: Part 2. Operative approaches. , 1981, Neurosurgery.

[5]  Theodore H Schwartz,et al.  STEREOTACTIC MINIMALLY INVASIVE TUBULAR RETRACTOR SYSTEM FOR DEEP BRAIN LESIONS , 2008, Neurosurgery.

[6]  P. Kelly,et al.  Computer-interactive stereotactic resection of deep-seated and centrally located intraaxial brain lesions. , 1987, Applied neurophysiology.

[7]  M R Gaab,et al.  ICP monitoring. , 1984, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[8]  Manuel Dujovny,et al.  Brain retraction injury , 2003, Neurological research.

[9]  Erich O. Richter,et al.  Cingulotomy for psychiatric disease: microelectrode guidance, a callosal reference system for documenting lesion location, and clinical results. , 2008, Neurosurgery.

[10]  A. Lewis Endoscopic management of colloid cysts. , 1999, Neurosurgery.

[11]  P. Kelly Image-directed tumor resection. , 1990, Neurosurgery clinics of North America.

[12]  L. Lunsford,et al.  Microsurgical Removal of Intraventricular Lesions Using Endoscopic Visualization and Stereotactic Guidance , 2005, Neurosurgery.

[13]  H. Jho,et al.  Endoscopic removal of third ventricular tumors: a technical note. , 2002, Minimally invasive neurosurgery : MIN.

[14]  P. Kelly,et al.  STEREOTACTIC VOLUMETRIC RESECTION OF THALAMIC PILOCYTIC ASTROCYTOMAS , 2007, Neurosurgery.