Genetically engineered neural networks for predicting prostate cancer progression after radical prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVES To use pathologic, morphometric, DNA ploidy, and clinical data to develop and test a genetically engineered neural network (GENN) for the prediction of biochemical (prostate-specific antigen [PSA]) progression after radical prostatectomy in a select group of men with clinically localized prostate cancer. METHODS Two hundred fourteen men who underwent anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer were selected on the basis of adequate follow-up, pathologic criteria indicating an intermediate risk of progression, and availability of archival tissue. The median age was 58.9 years (range 40 to 87). Men with Gleason score 5 to 7 and clinical Stage T1b-T2c tumors were included. Follow-up was a median of 9.5 years. Three GENNs were developed using pathologic findings (Gleason score, extraprostatic extension, surgical margin status), age, quantitative nuclear grade (QNG), and DNA ploidy. These networks were developed using three randomly selected training (n = 136) and testing (n = 35) sets. Different variable subsets were compared for the ability to maximize prediction of progression. Both standard logistic regression and Cox regression analyses were used concurrently to calculate progression risk. RESULTS Biochemical (PSA) progression occurred in 84 men (40%), with a median time to progression of 48 months (range 1 to 168). GENN models were trained using inputs consisting of (a) pathologic features and patient age; (b) QNG and DNA ploidy; and (c) all variables combined. These GENN models achieved an average accuracy of 74.4%, 63.1 %, and 73.5%, respectively, for the prediction of progression in the training sets. In the testing sets, the three GENN models had an accuracy of 74.3%, 80.0%, and 78.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The GENN models developed show promise in predicting progression in select groups of men after radical prostatectomy. Neural networks using QNG and DNA ploidy as input variables performed as well as networks using Gleason score and staging information. All GENN models were superior to logistic regression modeling and to Cox regression analysis in prediction of PSA progression. The development of models using improved input variables and imaging systems in larger, well-characterized patient groups with long-term follow-up is ongoing.

[1]  W. Catalona,et al.  Artificial neural networks in the diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer: a pilot study. , 1994, The Journal of urology.

[2]  M. Cowen,et al.  Computer modeling in urology. , 1996, Urology.

[3]  A. Partin,et al.  Prostate-specific antigen after anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. Patterns of recurrence and cancer control. , 1997, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[4]  P H Bartels,et al.  A hybrid neural and statistical classifier system for histopathologic grading of prostatic lesions. , 1995, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[5]  O. Brawley,et al.  Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates among White and Black Men , 1997, Epidemiology.

[6]  R. Veltri,et al.  The role of biopsy pathology, quantitative nuclear morphometry, and biomarkers in the preoperative prediction of prostate cancer staging and prognosis. , 1998, Seminars in urologic oncology.

[7]  M. Kattan,et al.  A preoperative nomogram for disease recurrence following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. , 1998, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[8]  S Forrest,et al.  Genetic algorithms , 1996, CSUR.

[9]  F. Marshall,et al.  Selection of men at high risk for disease recurrence for experimental adjuvant therapy following radical prostatectomy. , 1995, Urology.

[10]  J. V. Bacus,et al.  Prostate Adenocarcinoma: An Image Analysis Technique for DNA Ploidy Determination , 1993 .

[11]  A. D'Amico,et al.  A multivariate analysis of clinical and pathological factors that predict for prostate specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. , 1995, The Journal of urology.

[12]  R W Veltri,et al.  Ability to predict biochemical progression using Gleason score and a computer-generated quantitative nuclear grade derived from cancer cell nuclei. , 1996, Urology.

[13]  D C Young,et al.  An algorithm for predicting nonorgan confined prostate cancer using the results obtained from sextant core biopsies with prostate specific antigen level. , 1996, The Journal of urology.

[14]  A W Partin,et al.  Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer. A multi-institutional update. , 1997, JAMA.

[15]  A. Tewari,et al.  Novel staging tool for localized prostate cancer: a pilot study using genetic adaptive neural networks. , 1998, The Journal of urology.