Functional Brain Network Classification With Compact Representation of SICE Matrices

Recently, a sparse inverse covariance estimation (SICE) technique has been employed to model functional brain connectivity. The inverse covariance matrix (SICE matrix in short) estimated for each subject is used as a representation of brain connectivity to discriminate Alzheimers disease from normal controls. However, we observed that direct use of the SICE matrix does not necessarily give satisfying discrimination, due to its high dimensionality and the scarcity of training subjects. Looking into this problem, we argue that the intrinsic dimensionality of these SICE matrices shall be much lower, considering 1) an SICE matrix resides on a Riemannian manifold of symmetric positive definiteness matrices, and 2) human brains share common patterns of connectivity across subjects. Therefore, we propose to employ manifold-based similarity measures and kernel-based PCA to extract principal connectivity components as a compact representation of brain network. Moreover, to cater for the requirement of both discrimination and interpretation in neuroimage analysis, we develop a novel preimage estimation algorithm to make the obtained connectivity components anatomically interpretable. To verify the efficacy of our method and gain insights into SICE-based brain networks, we conduct extensive experimental study on synthetic data and real rs-fMRI data from the ADNI dataset. Our method outperforms the comparable methods and improves the classification accuracy significantly.

[1]  Nick Barnes,et al.  Identifying Anatomical Shape Difference by Regularized Discriminative Direction , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  J. Pekar,et al.  A method for making group inferences from functional MRI data using independent component analysis , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[3]  Chaogan Yan,et al.  DPARSF: A MATLAB Toolbox for “Pipeline” Data Analysis of Resting-State fMRI , 2010, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[4]  M. P. van den Heuvel,et al.  Normalized Cut Group Clustering of Resting-State fMRI Data , 2008, PloS one.

[5]  TuzelOncel,et al.  Pedestrian Detection via Classification on Riemannian Manifolds , 2008 .

[6]  Xue Yang,et al.  Evaluation of Statistical Inference on Empirical Resting State fMRI , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  Ivor W. Tsang,et al.  The pre-image problem in kernel methods , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[8]  Xavier Pennec,et al.  A Riemannian Framework for Tensor Computing , 2005, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[9]  M. V. D. Heuvel,et al.  Exploring the brain network: A review on resting-state fMRI functional connectivity , 2010, European Neuropsychopharmacology.

[10]  P. Thomas Fletcher,et al.  Principal geodesic analysis for the study of nonlinear statistics of shape , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  Iven Van Mechelen,et al.  Visualizing Distributions of Covariance Matrices ∗ , 2011 .

[12]  Dimitri Van De Ville,et al.  Classifying minimally disabled multiple sclerosis patients from resting state functional connectivity , 2012, NeuroImage.

[13]  Daoqiang Zhang,et al.  Constrained Sparse Functional Connectivity Networks for MCI Classification , 2012, MICCAI.

[14]  Fatih Murat Porikli,et al.  Pedestrian Detection via Classification on Riemannian Manifolds , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[15]  C. Jack,et al.  Prediction of AD with MRI-based hippocampal volume in mild cognitive impairment , 1999, Neurology.

[16]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Nonlinear Component Analysis as a Kernel Eigenvalue Problem , 1998, Neural Computation.

[17]  Vinod Menon,et al.  Functional connectivity in the resting brain: A network analysis of the default mode hypothesis , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Lei Wang,et al.  Exploring Compact Representation of SICE Matrices for Functional Brain Network Classification , 2014, MLMI.

[19]  Marcus Kaiser,et al.  A tutorial in connectome analysis: Topological and spatial features of brain networks , 2011, NeuroImage.

[20]  Jean-Baptiste Poline,et al.  A Novel Sparse Group Gaussian Graphical Model for Functional Connectivity Estimation , 2013, IPMI.

[21]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Brain mechanisms of successful compensation during learning in Alzheimer disease , 2006, Neurology.

[22]  Randy L. Buckner,et al.  Unrest at rest: Default activity and spontaneous network correlations , 2007, NeuroImage.

[23]  Baxter P. Rogers,et al.  Unsupervised Spatiotemporal Analysis of FMRI Data Using Graph-Based Visualizations of Self-Organizing Maps , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso. , 2008, Biostatistics.

[25]  Kamil Ugurbil,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging at Ultrahigh Fields , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[26]  I. Dryden,et al.  Non-Euclidean statistics for covariance matrices, with applications to diffusion tensor imaging , 2009, 0910.1656.

[27]  Gunnar Rätsch,et al.  Kernel PCA and De-Noising in Feature Spaces , 1998, NIPS.

[28]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Functional connectomics from resting-state fMRI , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Network modelling methods for FMRI , 2011, NeuroImage.

[30]  Shuiwang Ji,et al.  SLEP: Sparse Learning with Efficient Projections , 2011 .

[31]  Hongdong Li,et al.  Kernel Methods on the Riemannian Manifold of Symmetric Positive Definite Matrices , 2013, 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[32]  S. Sra Positive definite matrices and the Symmetric Stein Divergence , 2011 .

[33]  Suvrit Sra,et al.  A new metric on the manifold of kernel matrices with application to matrix geometric means , 2012, NIPS.

[34]  W. Förstner,et al.  A Metric for Covariance Matrices , 2003 .

[35]  Jing Li,et al.  Learning brain connectivity of Alzheimer's disease by sparse inverse covariance estimation , 2010, NeuroImage.

[36]  N. Ayache,et al.  Log‐Euclidean metrics for fast and simple calculus on diffusion tensors , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[37]  O. Sporns,et al.  Identification and Classification of Hubs in Brain Networks , 2007, PloS one.

[38]  Peter Bühlmann,et al.  Missing values: sparse inverse covariance estimation and an extension to sparse regression , 2009, Statistics and Computing.

[39]  Allen Tannenbaum,et al.  Statistical shape analysis using kernel PCA , 2006, Electronic Imaging.

[40]  Brian C. Lovell,et al.  Sparse Coding and Dictionary Learning for Symmetric Positive Definite Matrices: A Kernel Approach , 2012, ECCV.

[41]  S. Rombouts,et al.  Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience Systems Neuroscience , 2022 .

[42]  M. P. van den Heuvel,et al.  Exploring the brain network: a review on resting-state fMRI functional connectivity. , 2010, European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology.

[43]  S. Rombouts,et al.  Consistent resting-state networks across healthy subjects , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  Dimitri Van De Ville,et al.  Principal components of functional connectivity: A new approach to study dynamic brain connectivity during rest , 2013, NeuroImage.

[45]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Detection of Brain Functional-Connectivity Difference in Post-stroke Patients Using Group-Level Covariance Modeling , 2010, MICCAI.

[46]  Toshimitsu Musha,et al.  EEG Markers for Characterizing Anomalous Activities of Cerebral Neurons in NAT (Neuronal Activity Topography) Method , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[47]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  The future of FMRI connectivity , 2012, NeuroImage.

[48]  Erik W. Grafarend,et al.  Geodesy-The Challenge of the 3rd Millennium , 2003 .

[49]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.