A Design and Optimization Methodology for Liquid Metal Fast Reactors

A liquid metal fast reactor (LMFR) design and optimization methodology (DOM) has been developed. The methodology effectively explores a search space by initially sampling the search space, excluding invalid design samples prior to performing expensive multiphysics analysis, and then performing local searches of the design space. The design samples are evaluated using the multiphysics capabilities of the LUPINE LMFR simulation suite. Two studies have been performed to demonstrate DOM. First, the Westinghouse long-life core lead fast reactor (WLFR) is optimized. This reactor is 950 MW th and fueled with uranium nitride (UN) fuel which has a natural nitrogen isotopic abundance. The objective of the optimization is the reduction of the levelized fuel cycle cost (LFCC) while complying with the design constraints. Considering the challenges associated with using natural nitrogen in nitride fuel, a second study was performed to design a competitive 15N-enriched UN-fueled long-life core LFR. Based on this design, the cost of the 15N enrichment process necessary to achieve a competitive LFCC was calculated.

[1]  S. Palmtag,et al.  A multiphysics simulation suite for liquid metal-cooled fast reactors , 2021 .

[2]  Deokjung Lee,et al.  MicroURANUS: Core design for long‐cycle lead‐bismuth‐cooled fast reactor for marine applications , 2021, International Journal of Energy Research.

[3]  N. Roy,et al.  Physics-informed reinforcement learning optimization of nuclear assembly design , 2020, Nuclear Engineering and Design.

[4]  Xiao Luo,et al.  Automated core design code development for a lead‐cooled fast reactor and its core optimization , 2020, International Journal of Energy Research.

[5]  Shi Wei,et al.  Core design and analysis of a lead-bismuth cooled small modular reactor , 2019, Annals of Nuclear Energy.

[6]  Haoran Zhang,et al.  Preliminary design of a medium‐power modular lead‐cooled fast reactor with the application of optimization methods , 2018, International Journal of Energy Research.

[7]  Peng Zhang,et al.  Design study of long‐life small modular sodium‐cooled fast reactor , 2017 .

[8]  E. Lahoda,et al.  Development of LWR Fuels with Enhanced Accident Tolerance , 2015 .

[9]  Konstantin Mikityuk,et al.  The core design of ALFRED, a demonstrator for the European lead-cooled reactors , 2014 .

[10]  Ehud Greenspan,et al.  The ADOPT code for automated fast reactor core design , 2014 .

[11]  Magnus Arnér,et al.  Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments , 2014 .

[12]  C. Deutsch,et al.  Latin hypercube sampling with multidimensional uniformity , 2012 .

[13]  David Joseph Kropaczek,et al.  COPERNICUS: A multi-cycle optimization code for nuclear fuel based on parallel simulated annealing with mixing of states , 2011 .

[14]  Caro Lucas,et al.  Optimization of fuel core loading pattern design in a VVER nuclear power reactors using Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) , 2009 .

[15]  James J. Sienicki,et al.  Status report on the Small Secure Transportable Autonomous Reactor (SSTAR) /Lead-cooled Fast Reactor (LFR) and supporting research and development. , 2008 .

[16]  Johan Carlsson,et al.  Comparison of sodium and lead-cooled fast reactors regarding reactor physics aspects, severe safety and economical issues , 2006 .

[17]  Richard J. Beckman,et al.  A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code , 2000, Technometrics.