Atmospheric Correction of Airborne Hyperspectral CASI Data Using Polymer, 6S and FLAASH

Airborne hyperspectral data play an important role in remote sensing of coastal waters. However, before their application, atmospheric correction is required to remove or reduce the atmospheric effects caused by molecular and aerosol scattering and absorption. In this study, we first processed airborne hyperspectral CASI-1500 data acquired on 4 May 2019 over the Uljin coast of Korea with Polymer and then compared the performance with the other two widely used atmospheric correction approaches, i.e., 6S and FLAASH, to determine the most appropriate correction technique for CASI-1500 data in coastal waters. Our results show the superiority of Polymer over 6S and FLAASH in deriving the Rrs spectral shape and magnitude. The performance of Polymer was further evaluated by comparing CASI-1500 Rrs data with those obtained from the MODIS-Aqua sensor on 3 May 2019 and processed using Polymer. The spectral shapes of the derived Rrs from CASI-1500 and MODIS-Aqua matched well, but the magnitude of CASI-1500 Rrs was approximately 0.8 times lower than MODIS Rrs. The possible reasons for this difference were time difference (1 day) between CASI-1500 and MODIS data, higher land adjacency effect for MODIS-Aqua than for CASI-1500, and possible errors in MODIS Rrs from Polymer.

[1]  Roger N. Clark,et al.  Causes of spurious features in spectral reflectance data , 1987 .

[2]  A. Goetz,et al.  Atmospheric correction algorithms for hyperspectral remote sensing data of land and ocean , 2009 .

[3]  Javier Marcello,et al.  Assessment of Atmospheric Algorithms to Retrieve Vegetation in Natural Protected Areas Using Multispectral High Resolution Imagery , 2016, Sensors.

[4]  Anton J. J. van Rompaey,et al.  he effect of atmospheric and topographic correction methods on land cover lassification accuracy , 2013 .

[5]  F. Kruse Use of airborne imaging spectrometer data to map minerals associated with hydrothermally altered rocks in the northern grapevine mountains, Nevada, and California , 1988 .

[6]  D. Roberts,et al.  Comparison of various techniques for calibration of AIS data , 1986 .

[7]  Jaehoon Jung,et al.  Optimal Atmospheric Correction for Above-Ground Forest Biomass Estimation with the ETM+ Remote Sensor , 2015, Sensors.

[8]  Alexander F. H. Goetz,et al.  HIGH-ACCURACY ATMOSPHERE CORRECTION FOR HYPERSPECTRAL DATA ( HATCH ) , 2000 .

[9]  Gérard Dedieu,et al.  Relative Radiometric Normalization and Atmospheric Correction of a SPOT 5 Time Series , 2008, Sensors.

[10]  Javier Marcello,et al.  Benthic Habitat Mapping Using Multispectral High-Resolution Imagery: Evaluation of Shallow Water Atmospheric Correction Techniques , 2017, Sensors.

[11]  A. Gitelson,et al.  Estimation of chlorophyll-a concentration in turbid productive waters using airborne hyperspectral data. , 2012, Water research.

[12]  R. Healy,et al.  Atmospheric correction for hyperspectral ocean color retrieval with application to the Hyperspectral Imager for the Coastal Ocean (HICO) , 2018 .

[13]  R. Green,et al.  AIS-2 radiometry and a comparison of methods for the recovery of ground reflectance , 1987 .

[14]  François Steinmetz,et al.  Sentinel-2 MSI and Sentinel-3 OLCI consistent ocean colour products using POLYMER , 2018, Asia-Pacific Remote Sensing.

[15]  Chuanmin Hu,et al.  Comparison of two atmospheric correction approaches applied to MODIS measurements over North American waters , 2018, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[16]  Paul E. Lewis,et al.  FLAASH, a MODTRAN4-based atmospheric correction algorithm, its application and validation , 2002, IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.