Land-Use and Land-Cover Mapping Using a Gradable Classification Method

Conventional spectral-based classification methods have significant limitations in the digital classification of urban land-use and land-cover classes from high-resolution remotely sensed data because of the lack of consideration given to the spatial properties of images. To recognize the complex distribution of urban features in high-resolution image data, texture information consisting of a group of pixels should be considered. Lacunarity is an index used to characterize different texture appearances. It is often reported that the land-use and land-cover in urban areas can be effectively classified using the lacunarity index with high-resolution images. However, the applicability of the maximum-likelihood approach for hybrid analysis has not been reported. A more effective approach that employs the original spectral data and lacunarity index can be expected to improve the accuracy of the classification. A new classification procedure referred to as “gradable classification method” is proposed in this study. This method improves the classification accuracy in incremental steps. The proposed classification approach integrates several classification maps created from original images and lacunarity maps, which consist of lacnarity values, to create a new classification map. The results of this study confirm the suitability of the gradable classification approach, which produced a higher overall accuracy (68%) and kappa coefficient (0.64) than those (65% and 0.60, respectively) obtained with the maximum-likelihood approach.

[1]  Soe Win Myint,et al.  An Evaluation of Four Different Wavelet Decomposition Procedures for Spatial Feature Discrimination in Urban Areas , 2002, Trans. GIS.

[2]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data , 1991 .

[3]  J. R. Jensen,et al.  Remote Sensing of Urban/Suburban Infrastructure and Socio‐Economic Attributes , 2011 .

[4]  Pinliang Dong,et al.  Lacunarity for Spatial Heterogeneity Measurement in GIS , 2000, Ann. GIS.

[5]  P. Dare Shadow Analysis in High-Resolution Satellite Imagery of Urban Areas , 2005 .

[6]  Stéphane Couturier,et al.  Morpho-spatial extraction of urban nuclei in diffusely urbanized metropolitan areas , 2011 .

[7]  H.-P. Bähr,et al.  Wavelet Compression and the Automatic Classification of Urban Environments Using High Resolution Multispectral Imagery and Laser Scanning Data , 2001, GeoInformatica.

[8]  Soe Win Myint,et al.  A study of lacunarity-based texture analysis approaches to improve urban image classification , 2005, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[9]  B. Mandelbrot,et al.  Geometric Implementation of Hypercubic Lattices with Noninteger Dimensionality by Use of Low Lacunarity Fractal Lattices , 1983 .

[10]  Geoffrey M. Henebry,et al.  Lacunarity as a texture measure for SAR imagery , 1995 .

[11]  C. Allain,et al.  Characterizing the lacunarity of random and deterministic fractal sets. , 1991, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[12]  Y. Malhi,et al.  Analysis of lacunarity and scales of spatial homogeneity in IKONOS images of Amazonian tropical forest canopies , 2008 .

[13]  S. Barr,et al.  INFERRING URBAN LAND USE FROM SATELLITE SENSOR IMAGES USING KERNEL-BASED SPATIAL RECLASSIFICATION , 1996 .

[14]  N. Lam,et al.  Urban Textural Analysis from Remote Sensor Data: Lacunarity Measurements Based on the Differential Box Counting Method , 2006 .

[15]  Pinliang Dong,et al.  Test of a new lacunarity estimation method for image texture analysis , 2000 .

[16]  R. Voss Random Fractals: characterization and measurement , 1991 .

[17]  Z. R. Yang,et al.  A suggested lacunarity expression for Sierpinski carpets , 1986 .

[18]  R. Voss Characterization and Measurement of Random Fractals , 1986 .

[19]  E. Muller Mapping riparian vegetation along rivers: old concepts and new methods , 1997 .

[20]  May Yuan,et al.  Categorizing natural disaster damage assessment using satellite-based geospatial techniques , 2008 .

[21]  B. Mandelbrot Fractal Geometry of Nature , 1984 .

[22]  W. Hargrove,et al.  Lacunarity analysis: A general technique for the analysis of spatial patterns. , 1996, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[23]  D. Green,et al.  A Methodology for Acquiring Information on Vegetation Succession from Remotely Sensed Imagery , 1993 .

[24]  N. Lam,et al.  Examining Lacunarity Approaches in Comparison with Fractal and Spatial Autocorrelation Techniques for Urban Mapping , 2005 .

[25]  R. O'Neill,et al.  Lacunarity indices as measures of landscape texture , 1993, Landscape Ecology.

[26]  M. Baatz,et al.  Progressing from object-based to object-oriented image analysis , 2008 .

[27]  Faith R. Kearns,et al.  Classification of the wildland-urban interface: A comparison of pixel- and object-based classifications using high-resolution aerial photography , 2008, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[28]  Patrick Hostert,et al.  Applying Imaging Spectrometry in Urban Areas , 2006 .

[29]  Martin Herold,et al.  Spectral resolution requirements for mapping urban areas , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[30]  C. Sparrow The Fractal Geometry of Nature , 1984 .

[31]  Jacob Cohen A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[32]  James M. Keller,et al.  Texture description and segmentation through fractal geometry , 1989, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..